Do a google of ayc and sh awd. its the same thing . As far as the tsx being an evo, no but because its a honda you will have a sea of parts for the car and the crowd mitsu is tring to get will see the tsx and go to it. Its a honda. Thats if the tsx is 260 turbo awd. Right now it's rumors that pointing to the real thing. No more off topic

 

the tsx sh-awd will only interest me if its avail with a manual...and right now its only connected to a 5spd AT

 

^^ Plus does it let you switch off no, part, or all of the ASC, while in tarmac, snow, or gravel mode, while at the same time being in any of 3 shift pattern, one of which is a motorsports-derived track-only shift map? And what of the algorithms driving the hardware? Were they conjured from the icy roads of Finland, the harsh deserts of Africa, or the cubicles of the safety engineers at the home office? My point, obviously, is that active diffs do not S-AWC make. cooked up the S-AWC software on their own through years in racing on the harshest surfaces on the planet, and I doubt they are sharing...

 

http://homepage.mac.com/nateut/files...1e0d3-121.html
Its still in the air but it will get a 6 speed dsg

 

interesting..i wonder how much that type-s would cost.....but id still rather have a manual than a dsg

 

Thanks for the write up. One of the best threads I have ever read.

 

honda will end up ruining it, like the mazda 6 never competed with the evo/ sti.

 

I hear ya

 

You want undriven cars, get a European delivery of a BMW or Merc.
That plastic-y interior is a definite deal-breaker

 

wtf is a european delivery, should i google it?

 

What the, . . . you haven't tried that new sex position?

 

^^^Lol.

 

One of the funniest posts I've read on EvoM

 

^^^yeh funny as hell.

 

every turbo is a same? because then wont matter you are running on 20g or 16 g, right?