No biggie. The 8.56 was a very good pass. Decent 60', quick 1-2 shift, perfect if you don't count the door flying off at the traps.

The 8.71 pass was an easy pass to keep from breaking as it was the last shot of the day. We did some suspension tuning and had the car hooking so well, we were destroying tcase after tcase. I rolled out of the line and slow shifted 1-2. The car was making more horsepower though. Despite running 4 mph slower in the 1/8th, it still big ended hard and ran 171.1

If you watch the 2 videos, you can clearly see the difference in agressiveness in the launch and 1-2 shift.

 

the ams vids on youtube are sick

 

thank you all for not going as i asked

 

^ LOL , that's funny

 

250whp on a Dynojet is not a problem. I made 222whp on a DD, so it would make 250 at the nearby Dynojet, but I'm not paying twice. When my Evo VIII made 301whp on a dynojet, it made 266whp on the dyno dynamics a couple weeks later.

The correction factor is 1.125 between the two. That puts me at 249.x whp. Sounds bang on 250whp to me.

 

I thought IXs made 220-230 on a dyno dynamics, 250-260 on a dynojet. Sounds almost too close to a X.

 

it did , whats wrong with that?

 

HAHA at the Newb with the Civic SI

 

so if stock EVOs make 220-230hp on a DD, and 250-260hp on a DynoJet, yet the company officially advertised 243hp (286 at the crank), i guess the true HP of any EVO is somewhere in between a DD and a dynojet.
this actually makes sence, cause i recently put my car on a Dynojet, and it made 346hp with just bolt-ons, and a tune, which is 100+ more than stock, which i do not believe is possible.

 

Where are you gettin that "officially advertised" WHP number???