Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Evo X Mr Turned Down Because Of A/t

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:33 PM
  #1  
Joe's Evo X's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 3
From: Alamogordo, NM
Evo X Mr Turned Down Because Of A/t

Well I figured I would throw this out there. How many people (LIKE ME) turned away from buying the MR and bought a GSR because the MR has an A/T. IMO I have to have the feel of a M/T there is nothing else like it. Maybe if I buy a truck or a luxy. car down the road ill get an A/T MAYBE but not my EVO
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #2  
Spazpilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 570
Likes: 3
From: Carrollton, Texas
I also bought a GSR for this reason. Just not feelin the SST Tranny. Hopefully they will eventually make a Traditional 6 speed manual MR.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #3  
love9sick's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West IL
Originally Posted by Joe's Evo X
[B]Well I figured I would throw this out there. How many people (LIKE ME) turned away from buying the MR and bought a GSR because the MR has an A/T.
Me, Auto is for sissy girls.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #4  
Kdogg71's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Bambi and I also bought the GSR because we wanted a manual.

I'm really glad we did too because I tried one of the new GTS' with the paddles and a 2.4L, and I have to say it was somewhat difficult to stay completely focused on driving while trying to figure out the paddles. Obviously, shifting wouldn't create a distraction for very long, but for someone that has only ever owned manuals, it was an uncomfortable feeling.

...again, my experience with the paddles was on a GTS and not on an evo. I'm just offering my thoughts on the paddles alone.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #5  
Joe's Evo X's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 3
From: Alamogordo, NM
I have to say that i do agree with everybody so far. I just cant see some one owning an evo then you look inside and you see an A/T For me 5sp or 6 sp is the way to go. How are you suppost to do the famious 5500 rpm launch on an A/T. Now if the MR came in a 5 or 6sp that would be awesome
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
love9sick's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West IL
Originally Posted by Joe's Evo X
I have to say that i do agree with everybody so far. I just cant see some one owning an evo then you look inside and you see an A/T For me 5sp or 6 sp is the way to go. How are you suppost to do the famious 5500 rpm launch on an A/T. Now if the MR came in a 5 or 6sp that would be awesome
+1
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #7  
gizmotoy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 860
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Even if it is faster and ends up being reliable, which I think it in doubt at this time, I'd still have gotten the manual. If the MR had been available with a traditional manual, I would have bought that.

I'm still of the opinion that Mitsubishi strapped the GSR with a 5spd instead of a 6 to make the TC-SST look faster in comparison. Maybe they'll listen and add a 6spd option to the MR in later years.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #8  
Teraxx's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
It's due to market forces and the bottom line...Studies consistently show that 90%of vehicles bought in the US are automatics (I think the percentage is only slightly lower than that for sports cars). Since they want the MR to be the biggest seller of the bunch and save costs at the factory, this is why there is no manual MR.

However, in the future, if demand for a stick grows, they may rethink the decision to have a 6 speed manual MR. But, doubtful imo.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #9  
Joe's Evo X's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 3
From: Alamogordo, NM
Originally Posted by gizmotoy
Even if it is faster and ends up being reliable, which I think it in doubt at this time, I'd still have gotten the manual. If the MR had been available with a traditional manual, I would have bought that.

I'm still of the opinion that Mitsubishi strapped the GSR with a 5spd instead of a 6 to make the TC-SST look faster in comparison. Maybe they'll listen and add a 6spd option to the MR in later years.
Well i highly dought that the MR is faster then the GSR you cant beleive the magizne and there number. The only way to know for sure is to do it your self lol. I ran a 13.50 at 103mph in the 1/4mile stock at 3700ft above sea level. With a 1.9 60ft
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #10  
theoverachiever's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Oahu
As good as the TC-SST may be, id rather do the shifting myself. I figure I have 2 feet so i may as well use them. 10 cars so far and all of them with a "proper" transmission.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #11  
thatmr2guy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Cbus, Ohio
tell an f1 racer that if he was a real racer he would have never used a sequential gear box!

whenever you can focus more on your line, and have perfect consistent shifts you will always be a leg up on a standard m/t. the sequential manual transmissions are rampant in pro racing. its not about feel its about performance.

Of course clubbing an animal to death maybe more fun than shooting it with a 30.06......
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #12  
ggevoIX's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, Nebraska
even tho i not going to get an X, i do totally agree wid u and if i had to i'd only buy a gsr cuz of the manual transmission...
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #13  
CharlesJ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 1
From: FL
Nothing can replace the feel of a good manual, but ultimately, automated manuals (not a/t) are the way of the future and already heavily incorporated on many of the worlds high end sports cars. It does lack some of the feel and can be a bit video game, but once you get used to it (which doesnt take long) it does allow you to concentrate much more on driving and will allow you to be faster. In the case of the evo, it is NOT faster from a standing start as the MR is not designed for drag racing.

I am a bit torn myself, but I would gladly do an MR, or GTR for that matter.
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #14  
Shahul X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, Maryland
I dunno... I can see the point in both...I think traditional manual is more "fun" and I know as much as I say I will shift with paddles in the GTR that I will end up in auto mode 90% of the time after the novelty wears off....

but this is the new tech.... and like its been said...in F1 they use paddles...
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #15  
DirectorSe7en's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
How can anyone criticize a car they haven't driven?


This thread =




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 AM.