Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Harman Motive Evo X vs. 08 STI on Torque.TV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:24 PM
  #1  
Stephen@Harman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Torrance
Harman Motive Evo X vs. 08 STI on Torque.TV

Harman Motive/Stoptech Evo X vs. 08 STI on Torque.TV

This is a great segment on a rivalry that is very strong, the Evo X vs. 08 STI. Everyone should check this out. You will not be disappointed…

http://www.torque.tv/?player=TorqueT...t=1&ids=248676

Last edited by Stephen@Harman; Oct 25, 2008 at 10:31 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #2  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
What I think is funny is that it looks like the STi had an upgraded turbo and the evo didn't, and yet the evo still won by a large margin. They say in the video that the sti has a stage three package plus a reflash, which included an upgraded turbo while the EVO has a stage 2 with a reflash, which it looks like on your website only consists of an intake, exhaust, and upper IC pipe. That seems like an unfair comparison but the evo still won so I guess it's all good, but if those cars were equally modded then the EVO would've crushed that STi so bad that it wouldn't even be worth watching. I think it's funny that torque TV awarded the STi the engine category when it's more modded than the evo. The EVO makes almost as much power on the stock turbo as the STI with a turbo and fuel system upgrade so I'd say that makes the 4b11 a much better engine. Not only that, but the 4b11 is just a much better designed engine for making big power, and anyone who knows anything about engine design would know that. The guys at torque TV don't know jack about cars, but whatever. Oh, and what was with the evo's bumper popping off on the side? It kept getting covered up in the video whenever it would happen, but it looked like a clip was broken or something. What happened?

Last edited by STi2EvoX; Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:39 PM
  #3  
EVOIXNooB's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I ran my car (X) CCW at SOW last month and best time was a 1:24 with an experienced driver and I personally ran a 1:31 on my 1st track day ever. There was no posted times in your link..what was the times...
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:57 PM
  #4  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
If you watch the video the sti ran a 1:34 and the evo ran a 1:32. This was with modded cars as well and with a professional driver who I question the skill level of if you, an amateur, ran a 1:31 while a pro ran a 1:24. Please tell me that your evo isn't stock because if that's the case then the driver on torque TV is a joke.

Last edited by STi2EvoX; Oct 25, 2008 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 11:24 PM
  #5  
Web9's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Awesome video! Thanks for sharing. It's nice to see a modified shootout.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 12:13 AM
  #6  
UFO's Avatar
UFO
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
I noticed the Evo's bumper hanging off in parts of the film. Did the driver have a bit of an off?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #7  
wilson1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
From: CA
thanks for sharing!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 12:58 AM
  #8  
EVOIXNooB's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by STi2EvoX
If you watch the video the sti ran a 1:34 and the evo ran a 1:32. This was with modded cars as well and with a professional driver who I question the skill level of if you, an amateur, ran a 1:31 while a pro ran a 1:24. Please tell me that your evo isn't stock because if that's the case then the driver on torque TV is a joke.
No I was running 100 Oct at around 370whp. And was testing the protoype EVO X Moton Clubsports. Bad Bad setup....
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 02:06 AM
  #9  
fastkevin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Behind the Orange Curtain
Originally Posted by EVOIXNooB
No I was running 100 Oct at around 370whp. And was testing the protoype EVO X Moton Clubsports. Bad Bad setup....
They were running ON THE BIG TRACK. Not the Streets...
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 06:01 AM
  #10  
DVDee's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
I wonder if the guys over at IWSTI know about this video. I would love to see how they try to defend their baby.

Update:

They know about it. Of course they're in disbelief because the STI is so much lighter and it has more power. But stock the STI is lighter and has more power yet it still loses on the track and everything else except drag. What they don't know is that the Evo gains so much power from a tune and like the guy from Harman Motive said it exaggerates any other mod from there on. Throttle response is so good on the Evo after a tune, the results of this comparison don't surprise me. Here's their link:

http://www.iwsti.com/forums/video-co...sti-v-evo.html

Last edited by DVDee; Oct 26, 2008 at 06:17 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #11  
06evors's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Warminster, PA
They had to give something to the sti such as the engine category. It got beat up in the test so bad that the subaru croud is going to call foul anyway.

Edit: Just read the link they're pissed.

Last edited by 06evors; Oct 26, 2008 at 06:43 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 07:38 AM
  #12  
Thegame's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
^ Yeah, that link to the STI forums is funny!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #13  
hova00's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: WILMINGTON
I think the driver needs to learn how to launch the cars.
Look how bad both cars came off the line in the drag race portion of the vid.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #14  
AWD Ninja's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: The Mountains
is this video anywhere else besides torque.tv/ ? cause its not working for me at all

EDIT: I fixed it

Last edited by AWD Ninja; Oct 26, 2008 at 08:13 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #15  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
Lol, I looked at that link and the subaru guys are pissed. In their defense, they are right about the STi getting bogged on launch and that screwing the 1/4 mile times. If you look on harman motives's website and go to the blog section, they talk about the torque TV test and say that there was difficulty in launching the STi so the 1/4 mile times were a little off. They did say, however, that the lap times were very accurate as those are based on rolling starts so the STi guys can whine all they want but the evo is just better. What they don't realize is that although the numbers on paper seem high, the STi has a crappy power band and the area under the curve sucks. I used to own one, I would know. They make a wallop of torque and then it falls on it's face over 1000 rpms before redline and horsepower never really has a chance to develop or carry over. The evo doesn't make quite as much torque, but it has a much flatter torque curve and the horsepower keeps climbing all the way to redline. That combined with longer gears makes for a faster car. Suby FTL.

Last edited by STi2EvoX; Oct 26, 2008 at 08:49 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM.