Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Test pipe and flames

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #91  
steinvb12's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: Reading, PA
Originally Posted by GTLocke13
No, it naturally oxidizes in the atmosphere to CO2. Catalytic converters are mostly there to convert toxic compounds in the exhaust into something that's safer to breathe.

Personally, I run a high flow cat just because I don't want to deal with 1) ridiculous fines for not running one and 2) swapping it out when I need to get my car inspected. If I ever get serious about running my car in BSP, it'll get a test pipe that will get swapped for the weekends.

As far as the CO/CO2 effects, even if everyone who wanted to (not many) ran their cars without a cat for the extra 5hp, it won't really have an effect. We can do some math here:

Total atmospheric mass: 5.148x10^18 kg
Total atmospheric CO2 mass: 3.0x10^15 kg

It looks like a safe bounding average is 300g of CO2 per mile. In 2003, Americans traveled 3 trillion miles (3x10^12). This means our total output of CO2 from driving was around 9x10^11 kg of CO2. This is 0.03% of the total CO2 in the atmosphere. So even if everyone in the US bought 9 mpg SUV's, we'd double our output and add a total of 0.03% extra CO2 to the atmosphere. Insignificant, especially since the main greenhouse gas is water vapor, which comprises about 10x more volume than CO2.

I know what most of the theories say; I've read the research. I just don't think most of it is good science. Most climate research is either dry statistical analysis, or starts with a theory, then goes out and finds data that supports that theory. Very little of it is based on repeatable experiments, which are the cornerstone of good science.

The fact is, if our atmosphere was as fragile as most of the alarmists claim it is, the earth would have fallen off the knife edge a long time ago. In any system as big and old as our planet, equilibrium has pretty much been reached at this point, and for very good reasons. Negative feedbacks outweigh positive feedbacks by a significant margin.

Despite all this, I still run a catalytic converter.
Great example....I was waiting for someone to bring up this angle. The difference between running a car or not, is relatively non-existant to the big picture.

Just because you are running a cat doesn't mean you don't produce any harmful fumes. Do you product more fumes with a test pipe, sure. But the amount in so insignificant it not worth arguing about.

There are still many states in this country where test pipes are perfectly legal.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #92  
mike100's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by steinvb12
....
There are still many states in this country where test pipes are perfectly legal.
Maybe you aren't breaking a state law, but it is a federal violation to remove/tamper w/ emissions equipment unless your mods have been re-certified to be able to pass the FTP (fed test procedure).

The above post was talking about CO2 which is what you get from catalyzed exhaust. without it, your getting an assload of more harmful pollutants. Perhaps you are too young to remember Los Angeles in the 70's or have never been to China.

ON EDIT- emission equipment laws only apply to public roads that are taxed for the most part.

Last edited by mike100; Feb 4, 2009 at 06:14 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #93  
rageagtm's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Wa
i want to shoot flames.. will complete my transformation from domestic to import..
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 02:44 PM
  #94  
adamweldonjohns's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Castleton, VT
Originally Posted by GTLocke13
Most climate research is either dry statistical analysis, or starts with a theory, then goes out and finds data that supports that theory. Very little of it is based on repeatable experiments, which are the cornerstone of good science.
hy⋅poth⋅e⋅sis
   /haɪˈpɒθəsɪs, hɪ-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [hahy-poth-uh-sis, hi-] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -ses  /-ˌsiz/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [-seez] Show IPA Pronunciation .
1. a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.

^^^ not me, Random House Unabridged Dictionary.

Scientific Method requires a hypothesis to be established first before testing. Also, it doesn't matter whether the statistical information is DRY or not, just whether it is scientifically and mathematically accurate! Research documents are not best selling novels - they are TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS.

Maybe I'm wrong, but then again, I am currently enrolled in a capstone class entitled "Scientific Research and Analysis"




Somebody needs to shut this thread down! This is just getting to be a big flame-fest (no pun intended) .
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #95  
wesside's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 973
Likes: 1
From: Slc Utah aka SL,UT
haha I have a test pipe and shoot flames I'm meth injected though
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #96  
Evo a Mula's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
From: bayshore ny
test pipe means flames SOMETIMES and louder more exhaust smelling air and more power cat means tiny bit less power less noise and no flames if you dont want flames do not get a test pipe my evo 9 had a test pipe and when people would tailgate me i would downshift pop some flames and my tailgating problems were fixed
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 01:58 PM
  #97  
EvolutionBOOM's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: rosemead, ca
flames ftw!
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 12:19 AM
  #98  
Farmerbob's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Area 51
This company (Random Technology) makes high flow cats - from their webpage:

"Direct Fit Catalytic converters - Note that it is illegal to remove a properly functioning catalytic converter and that aftermarket catalytic converters are not legal for use on OBD2 vehicles in California (some 1994 and 1995 and all 1996 and later vehicles)."

http://www.randomtechnology.com/products.html

The 2008 Evo X - is it OBD2? If you got rear tailpipe flames in CA, you're asking for a cop's inspection, and return to your stock cat and exhaust.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #99  
contagius's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Whitecourt, Alberta
How did this thread turn into a hippie convention.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #100  
PessimiStick's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Farmerbob
This company (Random Technology) makes high flow cats - from their webpage:

"Direct Fit Catalytic converters - Note that it is illegal to remove a properly functioning catalytic converter and that aftermarket catalytic converters are not legal for use on OBD2 vehicles in California (some 1994 and 1995 and all 1996 and later vehicles)."

http://www.randomtechnology.com/products.html

The 2008 Evo X - is it OBD2? If you got rear tailpipe flames in CA, you're asking for a cop's inspection, and return to your stock cat and exhaust.
Stock cat was obviously not functioning properly.

Edit: Obviously this doesn't apply to CA's bass-ackwards draconian policies.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 11:47 AM
  #101  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by contagius
How did this thread turn into a hippie convention.
Because we no longer live in a world where doing anything and everything is acceptable.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:36 AM
  #102  
evosoh's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
I think its too rich on the over run.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:39 AM
  #103  
mullen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: the moon
wow this is still going?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #104  
CroatianKid's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Underneath the moon by a tree
Originally Posted by goofygrin
Dumb question, but is a $1000 fine worth the 5-15hp over a cat?

And personally, not running a cat simply makes EVERYONE's air worse. How'd you like if I was smoking a cigar in your face the whole time you were driving to work. That's what it's like driving behind someone running catless.

And to answer your question, tuning does not get rid of the flames.
Is he holding your face down at the exhaust and telling you to inhale..? No, so...get over it.. on top again, it just means your to rich and it buring up the excess gas left in the exhaust
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #105  
mal45247's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Kansas city
just put the catback on its bad enough the fines why would you risk it?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 PM.