2010 Evos get a power bump? (MR vs. SHO merged)

Subscribe
Search this Thread
Nov 11, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #46  
madfast's Avatar
Evolved Member
madfast
Evolved Member
close
  • Join Date
    Jun 2007
  • Location
    tsukuba turn 4
  • Posts:
    846
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noize
I'm only suggesting the cars that were used in the Cadillac shootout and Road & Track SHO comparo were tuned. Nothing more or less. How do you know they weren't? Why were both these tests a Graphite Gray MR Touring? Were they the same car?
i love conspiracies

the MR-T at the mitsu owners day was also GG so... yeah...
Reply 0
Nov 11, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #47  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
UT_Evo
Evolved Member
close
  • Join Date
    May 2004
  • Location
    SL,UT
  • Posts:
    3,601
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (5)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
What about the GSR? Any change there? If so, then we know it isn't all the SST.
Reply 0
Nov 11, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #48  
Sleestack's Avatar
Evolving Member
Sleestack
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Oct 2009
  • Location
    NY on my Mind
  • Posts:
    179
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (3)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by madfast
so the question begs, what do 08's dyno stock on that dynapack?

also mitsu now rates 2010 peak tq at 4000 so 4300 pk tq is more in line with 08's... Hmmm....

PS: Noize is 100% on the money. trap speed > et any day. anybody can have a good/bad launch, but when you trap that high, you packin some punch...
It's Works' dynapack so they probably have quite a bit of data on that. Post tune, my torque peaks at 3300 rpm and stays almost flat through 4500 rpm. Dynapacks tend to be very conservative.
Reply 0
Nov 12, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #49  
PaperClip's Avatar
Evolving Member
PaperClip
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Dec 2007
  • Location
    Maryland
  • Posts:
    312
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (3)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UT_Evo
What about the GSR? Any change there? If so, then we know it isn't all the SST.
good point. that will be interesting to see.
Reply 0
Nov 12, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #50  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
Methodical4u
Evolved Member
close
  • Join Date
    Jul 2006
  • Location
    Maryland
  • Posts:
    2,815
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (9)
  • Likes:
    2
  • Liked:
    1 Time in 1 Post
2010 Evo MR Touring Vs. 2010 Taurus SHO
Ok I don't have the actual article, but as i'm walking through Kmart with my wife I pick up Road and Track and am reading it as we're walking through the store... what most of us care about are the numbers though and I found them interesting... the MR has been the slower between itself and the GSR, so they either had absolutely PERFECT track condition, temps, etc or the 2010's are faster somehow... they managed to rip off a 13.2 in an MR Touring!! Vs. the 13.6 of the SHO. 0-60 times were 4.6 for the MR and I believe it was 4.9 or 5.0 for the SHO. Just thought I would share that... maybe someone can find the whole article online.
Reply 0
Nov 12, 2009 | 04:51 PM
  #51  
[I.R.A.]_FBi's Avatar
Evolving Member
[I.R.A.]_FBi
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Apr 2005
  • Location
    .
  • Posts:
    343
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=8461
Reply 0
Nov 12, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #52  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
Methodical4u
Evolved Member
close
  • Join Date
    Jul 2006
  • Location
    Maryland
  • Posts:
    2,815
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (9)
  • Likes:
    2
  • Liked:
    1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by [I.R.A.]_FBi
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....rticle_id=8461
awesome... thanks for the link... that 13.2 is impressive... does anyone know if anything had changed for the 10? A different tune perhaps? Anything?
Reply 0
Nov 12, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #53  
[I.R.A.]_FBi's Avatar
Evolving Member
[I.R.A.]_FBi
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Apr 2005
  • Location
    .
  • Posts:
    343
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
I "heard" freer flowing exhaust tranny remap and ecu remap
Reply 0
Nov 12, 2009 | 05:25 PM
  #54  
imboostinnow's Avatar
Evolving Member
imboostinnow
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2009
  • Location
    Miami FL
  • Posts:
    220
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (2)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
I belive the sst was re-mapped
Reply 0
Nov 12, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #55  
devinclfalcons's Avatar
Evolving Member
devinclfalcons
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Aug 2008
  • Location
    Houston, Texas
  • Posts:
    103
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    0
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (0)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by imboostinnow
I belive the sst was re-mapped
Whenever someone gets a definite answer as to whether the 2010's have a new sst flash that us 2008 owners can get let me know!
Reply 0
Nov 13, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #56  
MR. Tim's Avatar
Evolving Member
MR. Tim
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2007
  • Location
    Greensburg, PA
  • Posts:
    432
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (11)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    1 Time in 1 Post
You can compare both of R&T's data sheets from the 2008 MR to the 2010 MR. It can all be taken with a grain of salt, but for people that want to compare, this would be an easy way to do it.

2010:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...-Evo_chart.pdf

2008:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...Vwrx_chart.pdf
Reply 0
Nov 13, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #57  
MR. Tim's Avatar
Evolving Member
MR. Tim
Evolving Member
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2007
  • Location
    Greensburg, PA
  • Posts:
    432
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (11)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    1 Time in 1 Post
You can compare both of R&T's data sheets from the 2008 MR to the 2010 MR. It can all be taken with a grain of salt, but for people that want to compare, this would be an easy way to do it.

2010:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...-Evo_chart.pdf

2008:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...Vwrx_chart.pdf
Reply 0
Nov 15, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #58  
DepoRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
DepoRacing
Former Sponsor
close
  • Join Date
    Sep 2008
  • Location
    North
  • Posts:
    418
  • iTrader Positive Feedback
    100
  • iTrader Feedback Score
    (2)
  • Likes:
    0
  • Liked:
    0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazket
DSPORT Magazine dynoed a 2010 MR Touring and it did 320+ at the flywheel... they were saying how the car was underrated from factory. They dyno'd a bunch of other cars and their advertised number where 99% accurate, for example, their GT-R had 480 flywheel horsepower, and on the paper it says 485...
How the hell can they dyno a car and give a accurate flywheel hp give the wheel hp, thats what the dyno does !!! they are just guessing.

It would seem like a logical step to tune the 2010 better then the 2008. I don't think there is any mechanical changes between the two. I have a custom Ivey tune 305 whp/320wtq K & N drop in only, I will be very happy to welcome stock 2010 evo's to the road, 0 - 1
Reply 0
Tags 060, 2009, 2010, 360fq, evo, factory, faster, gsr, lancer, limited, mr, sho, taurus, touring, tune
Subscribe
 Reply to Thread

Related Topics

Back to Subforum
Evo X General
View Next Unread
uh oh... (idle issues and power loss)
4/4
1  2  3  4