Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2010 Evos get a power bump? (MR vs. SHO merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 08:18 AM
  #1  
boostlag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: fairfax
2010 Evos get a power bump? (MR vs. SHO merged)

Road and Track just tested the Evo MR touring, got 4.6sec 0-60 and 13.2 seconds at 103.6 with the SST. MR was always slower in the 2008 model, I think this is the faster recorded testing of any stock evos so far even the GSR's. Just by the 103mph trap tells me, the car is making least 30-40 more whp.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 08:27 AM
  #2  
steinvb12's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: Reading, PA
Originally Posted by boostlag
Road and Track just tested the Evo MR touring, got 4.6sec 0-60 and 13.2 seconds at 103.6 with the SST. MR was always slower in the 2008 model, I think this is the faster recorded testing of any stock evos so far even the GSR's. Just by the 103mph trap tells me, the car is making least 30-40 more whp.
NO. They attribute the difference is in the SST programming.

Just because the MR version was slower than the GSR in 2008, it's doesn't mean it will be the same for the 2010 models if the SST programming was changed.

Sorry, no power bump.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #3  
boostlag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: fairfax
difference in SST programing doesn't account for such high trap speeds. Trap speeds is about power and ET time is about shifting.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 08:44 AM
  #4  
raytrix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
no 50lb wing > 20 lb moon roof? lighter weight = faster time?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 09:46 AM
  #5  
mike100's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
downhill dragstrip with a tailwind in 60 degree air or they cheated/ secretly tuned the car.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #6  
heavyD's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by boostlag
difference in SST programing doesn't account for such high trap speeds. Trap speeds is about power and ET time is about shifting.
Has everyone forgot that all the initial magazine tests on 08's were performed on cars with the ultra crappy original factory tune? The better times are attributed partially to the new SST programming as well as the updated factory tune. The only difference between 08's and 10's is in tuning. As well there is alway variance in cars. You may see another 2010 MR test with slower times.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #7  
jazket's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Florida
DSPORT Magazine dynoed a 2010 MR Touring and it did 320+ at the flywheel... they were saying how the car was underrated from factory. They dyno'd a bunch of other cars and their advertised number where 99% accurate, for example, their GT-R had 480 flywheel horsepower, and on the paper it says 485...
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 10:34 AM
  #8  
boostlag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: fairfax
well the new tune is making significantly more power. 4-5mph increase in trap speed is like adding stage2.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 10:40 AM
  #9  
TK40's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: NYC
I have heard a few people who brought there car in to the dealer for service got the new tune and left saying the car felt faster, so they probably did get more power. Until a tuner chimes in we wont know what was changed though.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #10  
FTY Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: california
i drive stock 08s and 2010s all day long the 2010 is much faster stock vs stock. tuned obviously they are about the same.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #11  
LVSBB6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: CAN
In 2008 not a lot of magazines knew how to use the launch control, they just smash the throttle in normal mode and go. Thats part of the reason.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #12  
steinvb12's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: Reading, PA
Originally Posted by boostlag
well the new tune is making significantly more power. 4-5mph increase in trap speed is like adding stage2.
More like 1-2mph increase. Again, this could easily be the magazines/drivers not properly using launch control.

It certainly isn't 30-40hp!
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #13  
boostlag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: fairfax
Originally Posted by steinvb12
More like 1-2mph increase. Again, this could easily be the magazines/drivers not properly using launch control.

It certainly isn't 30-40hp!
that 2010 MR did 103.6. Fastest I've seen a 08 MR trap is 99mph. So I say its significant.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #14  
mike100's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
We all knew the 2008 tune was ****house, but the real question is why isn't Mitsubishi marketing the hp increase?

Maybe they didn't tell the EPA, or don't want warranty issues, but still...



ON EDIT: maybe insurance reasons...to not chase away potential customers due to higher insurance issues

Last edited by mike100; Oct 30, 2009 at 11:51 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #15  
LVSBB6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: CAN
Maybe the peak power hasn`t changed with the new tune, but the gains are under the curve.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:39 PM.