2010 Evos get a power bump? (MR vs. SHO merged)
2010 Evos get a power bump? (MR vs. SHO merged)
Road and Track just tested the Evo MR touring, got 4.6sec 0-60 and 13.2 seconds at 103.6 with the SST. MR was always slower in the 2008 model, I think this is the faster recorded testing of any stock evos so far even the GSR's. Just by the 103mph trap tells me, the car is making least 30-40 more whp.
Road and Track just tested the Evo MR touring, got 4.6sec 0-60 and 13.2 seconds at 103.6 with the SST. MR was always slower in the 2008 model, I think this is the faster recorded testing of any stock evos so far even the GSR's. Just by the 103mph trap tells me, the car is making least 30-40 more whp.
Just because the MR version was slower than the GSR in 2008, it's doesn't mean it will be the same for the 2010 models if the SST programming was changed.
Sorry, no power bump.
Has everyone forgot that all the initial magazine tests on 08's were performed on cars with the ultra crappy original factory tune? The better times are attributed partially to the new SST programming as well as the updated factory tune. The only difference between 08's and 10's is in tuning. As well there is alway variance in cars. You may see another 2010 MR test with slower times.
DSPORT Magazine dynoed a 2010 MR Touring and it did 320+ at the flywheel... they were saying how the car was underrated from factory. They dyno'd a bunch of other cars and their advertised number where 99% accurate, for example, their GT-R had 480 flywheel horsepower, and on the paper it says 485...
Trending Topics
I have heard a few people who brought there car in to the dealer for service got the new tune and left saying the car felt faster, so they probably did get more power. Until a tuner chimes in we wont know what was changed though.
We all knew the 2008 tune was ****house, but the real question is why isn't Mitsubishi marketing the hp increase?
Maybe they didn't tell the EPA, or don't want warranty issues, but still...
ON EDIT: maybe insurance reasons...to not chase away potential customers due to higher insurance issues
Maybe they didn't tell the EPA, or don't want warranty issues, but still...
ON EDIT: maybe insurance reasons...to not chase away potential customers due to higher insurance issues
Last edited by mike100; Oct 30, 2009 at 11:51 AM.



