View Poll Results: Which one is Faster the RS or MR
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll
Which One is Faster MR or RS
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Mitsubishi Santa Monica
Which One is Faster MR or RS
Which one is faster
RS is of course the lightest in weight
But the MR has six speeds and a better power band between each gear
If it does that would most definately make it faster on the track
But if the RS is lighter in weight, would that make it faster in the stright aways.
Some ones got to know the answer to this
RS is of course the lightest in weight
But the MR has six speeds and a better power band between each gear
If it does that would most definately make it faster on the track
But if the RS is lighter in weight, would that make it faster in the stright aways.
Some ones got to know the answer to this
Last edited by Clue?sion; Oct 30, 2004 at 05:04 PM.
Originally Posted by Clue?sion
Which one is faster
RS is of course the lightest in weight
But the MR has six speeds and a better power band between each gear
Does the MR have SAYC2
If it does that would most definately make it faster on the track
But if the RS is lighter in weight, would that make it faster in the stright aways.
Some ones got to know the answer to this
RS is of course the lightest in weight
But the MR has six speeds and a better power band between each gear
Does the MR have SAYC2
If it does that would most definately make it faster on the track
But if the RS is lighter in weight, would that make it faster in the stright aways.
Some ones got to know the answer to this
Speed is an un-defined term. Straight line? Cornering? Either way, your splitting hairs, either car will be faster based on the driver, not the car.
I do believe the RS is lighter though, so think about some physics and conclude for yourself....
Trending Topics
I thought the MR is RPM launch limited to 5000 RPM. It's that's the case, wouldn't the RS and 03 and 04 Evo be quicker in the 1/4 stock for stock since the best launch RPM is over 5000. I would think the 60 foot times would suffer on the MR because of this.
Anyone know?
Anyone know?
It's probably so close that it doesn't really matter. I have an '04 RS with A/C. I think the 88 lb. weight differential assumes the RS is without A/C, so the weight difference is probably only about 50 lbs. for my car. But so what.
The important thing is that the RS and the MR are faster than the STi.
For me, the big difference is the price. RS is way cheaper than MR. It's a personal choice, really.
The important thing is that the RS and the MR are faster than the STi.
For me, the big difference is the price. RS is way cheaper than MR. It's a personal choice, really.
When the '04 EVO RS first came out, Motor Trend tested it at 4.4 seconds 0 - 60 mph. I think that's a little optimistic, and involved some serious clutch abuse. Nevertheless, the EVO is at least one second quicker 0 - 60 mph than the 350Z, when both cars are stock out of the box. Spend a few grand modding each, and the EVO will pull away even faster.
If you compare the 05 MR vs the 05 RS the most likely would be about the same since both have the aluminuim roof,ACD, FLSD. But with the new RS having the 5spd it might be a hare quicker than the 6pd plus the RS is lighter.
If you compare the 05 MR vs the 05 RS the most likely would be about the same since both have the aluminuim roof,ACD, FLSD. But with the new RS having the 5spd it might be a hare quicker than the 6pd plus the RS is lighter.









-you should change your sig.