Hello All

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 27, 2006 | 05:11 PM

#136

Roarin_8

Thread Starter

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne,FL

Quote:

Originally Posted by LpBevoEvo

Thats just it, you aren't stating facts. I doubt you would beat his stalled cam car with your mildly modded evo 9. You are a noob, get over it.

He was saying that he is faster than my time from last year....... with 2.73s and the least stickiest drag radial on the market.

Last edited by Roarin_8; Jun 27, 2006 at 05:13 PM.

Jun 27, 2006 | 05:14 PM

#137

LpBevoEvo

Evolving Member

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 451

Likes: 0

From: Houston

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roarin_8

He was saying that he is faster than my time from last year.......

Too funny.

Jun 27, 2006 | 05:28 PM

#138

Roarin_8

Thread Starter

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne,FL

But damn, this is why I invited you guys to check out ls1tech also. No need to post if you don't want to but check out those guys setups, mines is mild to say the least.

Jun 27, 2006 | 05:28 PM

#139

Arithmetic

Evolved Member

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 3,856

Likes: 0

From: So Cal

Quote:

Originally Posted by IE Evo

Location: North Mexico (Inland Empire)

Jun 27, 2006 | 05:30 PM

#140

Roarin_8

Thread Starter

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne,FL

Jun 27, 2006 | 05:51 PM

#141

Roarin_8

Thread Starter

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne,FL

Quote:

Originally Posted by SKILMATIC

No you told me it was at 6000 for that run cause you said you didnt have the cam on yet.

Just caught this one and noticed I didn't answer it. When it was 6000, the shift extension would be at around 4800 on the old setup. Meaning when the car shifted from 1st to 2nd at 6000, the tach would drop to 4800 and climb up to 6000 from there to get to 3rd.

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:02 PM

#142

Roarin_8

Thread Starter

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne,FL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warrtalon

yes, being in the powerband makes better use of the power. WE know that, which is why we optimize our shift points to stay in that power band. Even so, staying in the best part of the powerband, we can't trap 112 with only 310whp even with less weight.

Doesn't having AWD rob more power since you are running 2 driveshafts to power all 4 wheels? That may be the reason why you can't trap 112 with 310whp. Either that or you caught crappy air.

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:03 PM

#143

Roarin_8

Thread Starter

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne,FL

Ok I think I'm caught up answering all the questions. whew....

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:06 PM

#144

LpBevoEvo

Evolving Member

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 451

Likes: 0

From: Houston

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roarin_8

Ok I think I'm caught up answering all the questions. whew....

I'm a member on tech, and my evo has been on Tony's (nineball) ls1tech trailer before .

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:10 PM

#145

SKILMATIC

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 1,671

Likes: 1

From: in a jet

Quote:

Originally Posted by LpBevoEvo

I have read the thread... You quoted me and said 11.9. I never said anyone ran an 11.9 in the post you quoted, hence my response.

Thats just it, you aren't stating facts. I doubt you would beat his stalled cam car with your mildly modded evo 9. You are a noob, get over it.

I have read the entire thread, even your comment about tuning a na v8 and picking up mad power

. Get a clue...

No I didnt quote you I quoted roarin cause I think he quoted you or maybe it was someone else. All I knwo is the post had 400whp on it and a 11.9 run. I will try and find it. Sorry for any confusion.

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:12 PM

#146

SKILMATIC

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 1,671

Likes: 1

From: in a jet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roarin_8

He was saying that he is faster than my time from last year....... with 2.73s and the least stickiest drag radial on the market.

Exactly his new time will without a doubt prolly be faster than my mild modded evo. If the car is much faster like you say it is then obviously a 11 sec run is within reach. Let us know how it goes roarin. Sorry for all the questions. I am just trying to figure out how this is. thats all

thanks for sticking with me though.

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:16 PM

#147

Roarin_8

Thread Starter

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 6

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne,FL

No problem and LpBevoEvo say hello to me on tech, my screenname is the same as here.

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:16 PM

#148

SKILMATIC

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 1,671

Likes: 1

From: in a jet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roarin_8

Doesn't having AWD rob more power since you are running 2 driveshafts to power all 4 wheels? That may be the reason why you can't trap 112 with 310whp. Either that or you caught crappy air.

this is true have u ever driven an evo before? just out of curiousity?

Jun 27, 2006 | 06:16 PM

#149

fusionchicken

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,661

Likes: 0

From: socal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roarin_8

Doesn't having AWD rob more power since you are running 2 driveshafts to power all 4 wheels? That may be the reason why you can't trap 112 with 310whp. Either that or you caught crappy air.

warr gave out whp IIRC which already took awd drivetrain loss into consideration.