Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Article on new Evo X and STi from Road And Track...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #16  
8thWonder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
The X will be my daily driver for sure.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #17  
Thugline's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Riverside,CA
Originally Posted by blitzkrieg79
Although the article is full of flaws, whether someone likes it or not, a true DSG tranny will offer better 0-60 acceleartion than a traditional manual transmission. And DSG not only has one clutch but it has two clutches.
How do u launch out of an "AT AWD TURBOED CAR"? I probably could be wrong about the theory I have about but, if u really think it about it u would need a stall converter to just to launch the **** from the dig.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 05:32 PM
  #18  
amstel78's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere...
Originally Posted by Thugline
How do u launch out of an "AT AWD TURBOED CAR"? I probably could be wrong about the theory I have about but, if u really think it about it u would need a stall converter to just to launch the **** from the dig.
There is no stall converter because the DSG is essentially a manual cog box with an electronically controlled, hydraulically actuated clutch system. It is not in anyway an automatic transmission, or even remotely similar to one in design. Once you understand that part, then everything else becomes easier.

Anyway, I'm pretty certain it will feature some sort of rev-limited launch control, similar to what BMW offers with its SMG systems. With LC, the computer limits maximum engine RPM from a standstill.. let's say 6K rpm. It will then drop the clutch when you instruct it to do so.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #19  
FlyboyX's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
35 ft-lbs more TQ, 500 rpm sooner, and $32-36k. Sounding pretty good.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #20  
reggiesd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
good article..and yeah, that sti actually looks ok...better from the previous pics of it shown. maybe it's the shot angle?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 06:19 PM
  #21  
amstel78's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere...
Originally Posted by reggiesd
good article..and yeah, that sti actually looks ok...better from the previous pics of it shown. maybe it's the shot angle?
It is a composite image, and not an actual photograph.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #22  
Evozster's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Thats total BS on performance!!!!!!! they're the one that said the current EVO RS can do 0-60 in 4.4 & 1/4 in 13.0......and now they're sayin that the X is gonna be faster than the IX.........with 0-60 in 4.5 and 1/4 in 13.5 the X dosen't sound faster it sounds SLOWER!!!!! Sounds like they don't read what they write!!!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #23  
EmanantEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ
Originally Posted by Thugline
How do u launch out of an "AT AWD TURBOED CAR"? I probably could be wrong about the theory I have about but, if u really think it about it u would need a stall converter to just to launch the **** from the dig.
Ever see how a WRC car launches from the starting line? They are insanely quick and do it in the dirt or on tarmac.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:37 PM
  #24  
go_evo_go's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas Nevada
Sounds like they know a lot for never driving the cars before. Performance wise they know as much info as we do, which pretty much is squat.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #25  
trexxx8739's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Evozster
Thats total BS on performance!!!!!!! they're the one that said the current EVO RS can do 0-60 in 4.4 & 1/4 in 13.0......and now they're sayin that the X is gonna be faster than the IX.........with 0-60 in 4.5 and 1/4 in 13.5 the X dosen't sound faster it sounds SLOWER!!!!! Sounds like they don't read what they write!!!
maybe it does sound slower if you read it as 13.5 sec 1/4. instead of a 12.5 sec 1/4 mile like it actually reads
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #26  
RenoEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Reno, NV
this article is total crap like others have pointed out. 12.5 ET with more weight and a touch more HP with no clutch, not gonna happen! Whats funny is stock IX's are some what underrated and really make about 300-310bhp completely stock. IMO the X will make about the same hp and run the same times as the IX but I could be wrong. And for the sake of future X owners, I hope I'm wrong!!!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #27  
gaulrich2003's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Southern, Ohio
Based on this article the STI might outperform the evo X.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 08:22 AM
  #28  
3000ways's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
Originally Posted by gaulrich2003
Based on this article the STI might outperform the evo X.
I doubt that, but you never know. But here are some things I am noticing (if the R&T article is indeed somewhat accurate). The EVO X will have an even larger turbo and it might be rated 300hp from the factory, but I believe it will in reality be making more. I even think it will spool quicker. I also think that all these weight complaints are with the SST or whatever its gonna be called, and the 5-speed manual will weigh considerably less. I also do not think the SST type transmission will weigh in at 3500Lbs. I guess we will just have to wait and see.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #29  
Design1stCode2n's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: MD
Well hopefully we should see some reviews of the JDM model in the fall.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #30  
FastCoEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
That Sti looks sick. I also like how Subaru is remembering what the car is used for and is keeping allot of the **** out of it.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 AM.