evo x dyno sheet
evo x dyno sheet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKuV3HLtX10
video has sheet.
here is the conversion
206 KW == 276.25055
422 N.m == 311.25123 foot pounds
video has sheet.
here is the conversion
206 KW == 276.25055
422 N.m == 311.25123 foot pounds
Last edited by rio-evo; Jul 20, 2007 at 04:52 PM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKuV3HLtX10
video has sheet.
here is the conversion
206 KW == 276.25055
422 N.m == 311.25123 foot pounds
video has sheet.
here is the conversion
206 KW == 276.25055
422 N.m == 311.25123 foot pounds
I am disappointed in the low HP number, but really, Torque is where the fun is at. And 311 stock is very good.
I also noted that I belive 276hp is the magic number that the japanese auto manufacturers agreed upon. So it may very well be underrated. Frankly, I'm much more interested in the torque figure and I'm rather happy about it.
Trending Topics
But we dont' know what the X weighs, and there's no hint in the video.
I'm still betting on 3350 base for the regular trimline. If that red is indeed a stripped-down X, I could see it at the MR's 3285.
These days are interesting times!
im not hating on you but just letting you know there are plenty of i hate evo X threads lets not make every thread one now.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
The question that wont be answered for a while is whether the new motor can handle big HP, e.g. 400 whp+.
the "official" hp number is obviously underrated. besides the fact that every japanese sports car being rated at 276 hp is fishy, the 4b11 has less stroke than the 4g63 yet makes 311 ft lbs vs 289 for the 4g63. whatever is making more tq will also make more hp especially given that displacement is basically the same and that the stroke is actually DECREASED and the redline is 7000.
this video makes the engine look very promising.
this video makes the engine look very promising.



