Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

evo x dyno sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #1  
rio-evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
evo x dyno sheet

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKuV3HLtX10

video has sheet.

here is the conversion

206 KW == 276.25055

422 N.m == 311.25123 foot pounds
Attached Thumbnails evo x dyno sheet-picture-1.jpg  

Last edited by rio-evo; Jul 20, 2007 at 04:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #2  
turtlelancer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
how are you so sure thats not to the wheels
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #3  
Draco-REX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: OH
Originally Posted by rio-evo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKuV3HLtX10

video has sheet.

here is the conversion

206 KW == 276.25055

422 N.m == 311.25123 foot pounds
I made some comments on the video HERE.

I am disappointed in the low HP number, but really, Torque is where the fun is at. And 311 stock is very good.

I also noted that I belive 276hp is the magic number that the japanese auto manufacturers agreed upon. So it may very well be underrated. Frankly, I'm much more interested in the torque figure and I'm rather happy about it.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #4  
jroller's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
if torque was where thee fun is @ i would have a diesel truck with most new diesels having over 400 ftlbs.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #5  
MYEVO8ur9's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: bakersfield
yea but the trucks weight is way more the an evo so you couldnt feel the fun
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #6  
Draco-REX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: OH
Originally Posted by jroller
if torque was where thee fun is @ i would have a diesel truck with most new diesels having over 400 ftlbs.
Why do you think VWs are liked so much? The low-end torque to the wheels makes them feel really sporty. Trust me, low-end grunt + AWD = perma-
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 05:57 PM
  #7  
jackygor's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From: VANCOUVER BC
Originally Posted by Draco-REX
Why do you think VWs are liked so much? The low-end torque to the wheels makes them feel really sporty. Trust me, low-end grunt + AWD = perma-
Don't care much for high speed. Low end torque is where you can have fun! if those numbers are WHP, then that is a lot of torque!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #8  
Draco-REX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: OH
Originally Posted by jackygor
Don't care much for high speed. Low end torque is where you can have fun! if those numbers are WHP, then that is a lot of torque!
Even if it's at the flywheel, it's a step up from the IX.

But we dont' know what the X weighs, and there's no hint in the video.

I'm still betting on 3350 base for the regular trimline. If that red is indeed a stripped-down X, I could see it at the MR's 3285.

These days are interesting times!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #9  
rio-evo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
I agree, I do like the torque number on a stock evo.

The HP number is week as hell!!

We can only hope the final version will be over 300 hp.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #10  
MrMejia's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Oceanside
okay thats it i'm throwing in the towel and trading my 03 for the X. Damn it all to HELL!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #11  
advancEvo27's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis MN
Damn they are definetly trying to be the Audi of japan w/ the whole styling and performance of the car
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 07:52 PM
  #12  
turtlelancer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by advancEvo27
Damn they are definetly trying to be the Audi of japan w/ the whole styling and performance of the car
And this pertains to the X dyno sheet? i think not

im not hating on you but just letting you know there are plenty of i hate evo X threads lets not make every thread one now.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #13  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Draco-REX
...

I also noted that I belive 276hp is the magic number that the japanese auto manufacturers agreed upon. So it may very well be underrated. Frankly, I'm much more interested in the torque figure and I'm rather happy about it.
Rather than underrated, its probably detuned. Its making great peak torque values, and the HP curve seems to have a very flat top suggesting that they are simply pulling back boost to keep the HP within the 276 HP value agreed upon for JDM vehicles. 300+ HP could be as easy as a tune.

The question that wont be answered for a while is whether the new motor can handle big HP, e.g. 400 whp+.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #14  
madfast's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: tsukuba turn 4
the "official" hp number is obviously underrated. besides the fact that every japanese sports car being rated at 276 hp is fishy, the 4b11 has less stroke than the 4g63 yet makes 311 ft lbs vs 289 for the 4g63. whatever is making more tq will also make more hp especially given that displacement is basically the same and that the stroke is actually DECREASED and the redline is 7000.

this video makes the engine look very promising.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 01:35 AM
  #15  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
dual exhaust is gay though...you have to agree w/ that...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:19 PM.