Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Why not a bigger engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #1  
bradc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Why not a bigger engine

Mitsi have made some great V6 engines such as the 6A13TT and of course the GTO engine, obviously the rally car will still need to be a 2.0, but why not make an evo x with a 2.5l twin turbo (maybe a pair of TD04's) V6 engine that would be a lot smoother and more powerful down low.

I don't see much of a reason to continue to stick with the small 4 cylinder.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Rally racing, you tard. They want to have production cars racing... Plus, gas mileage... nothing is cooler than a 2.0l turbo'd car that can smoke a V6 and get 5mpg more. There's lots of reasons. For example MIVEC helped smooth out the powerband a lot.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #3  
nongan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 572
Likes: 1
From: ca
Buy a mustang V8.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #4  
evo_rc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 4
From: Hot Az!!
newbz..... common man twin turbo v6 on rally?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #5  
Turbo Meg's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NH
Originally Posted by bradc
Mitsi have made some great V6 engines such as the 6A13TT and of course the GTO engine, obviously the rally car will still need to be a 2.0, but why not make an evo x with a 2.5l twin turbo (maybe a pair of TD04's) V6 engine that would be a lot smoother and more powerful down low.

I don't see much of a reason to continue to stick with the small 4 cylinder.
Sounds great but that's not an Evo. You should learn a little more about the history/evolution of the Evo.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
nolimits079's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: South Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by UT_Evo
Rally racing, you tard. They want to have production cars racing... Plus, gas mileage... nothing is cooler than a 2.0l turbo'd car that can smoke a V6 and get 5mpg more. There's lots of reasons. For example MIVEC helped smooth out the powerband a lot.
Yes, a turbo'd 2.0l is so cool that he traded in his Evo for a Porsche with a flat 6. Ok, if I could afford a Porsche Carrera 4 I would too.

But he's right. It's due to WRC rules.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #7  
nongan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 572
Likes: 1
From: ca
Buy a Pontiac GTO instead.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:20 PM
  #8  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
And I get about 3-5 mpg less than I did in the Evo Especially freeway driving.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #9  
gixxerman11's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
if got a 6 i would TT it any way i would put a huge turbo on it less part HAHA

but i love my evo
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #10  
Vigo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by UT_Evo
Rally racing, you tard. They want to have production cars racing... Plus, gas mileage... nothing is cooler than a 2.0l turbo'd car that can smoke a V6 and get 5mpg more. There's lots of reasons. For example MIVEC helped smooth out the powerband a lot.
More displacement is always a good idea. Not all road going versions of a rally car need to be 2 liters. Look a the U.S spec STI, it has a 2.5 liter engine, but the rally versions have two liters. As long as there are a certain amount in 2 liter form for homologation purposes the rest of the cars can have whatever kind of engine.

Last edited by Vigo; Aug 15, 2007 at 04:25 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #11  
Draco-REX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: OH
Originally Posted by Vigo
More displacement is always a good idea. Not all road going versions of a rally car need to be 2 liters. Look a the U.S spec STI, it has a 2.5 liter engine, but the rally versions have two liters. As long as there are certain amount in 2 liter form the rest of the cars can have whatever kind of engine.
I think it's partially because they need a 2.0L engine if they want to get back into rally. And partly because they only have to make ONE engine to drop into every Evo no matter where it goes which saves development and parts costs.

The STI is still a 2.0 in Japan to adhere to Rally specs.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #12  
bradc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
ok, keep the 2.0 option for racing, but have the option to run a larger smoother engine that will have less lag etc.

Also my VR-4 regularly gets 9l/100km, my friends with evo's get a similar level, and often a lot worse because they need to rag their engines hard to get them moving along at a decent speed, you tard.

Originally Posted by UT_Evo
Rally racing, you tard. They want to have production cars racing... Plus, gas mileage... nothing is cooler than a 2.0l turbo'd car that can smoke a V6 and get 5mpg more. There's lots of reasons. For example MIVEC helped smooth out the powerband a lot.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:53 PM
  #13  
freddiet's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Longview tx
blimey english turd's
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #14  
bradc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Vigo
More displacement is always a good idea. Not all road going versions of a rally car need to be 2 liters. Look a the U.S spec STI, it has a 2.5 liter engine, but the rally versions have two liters. As long as there are certain amount in 2 liter form the rest of the cars can have whatever kind of engine.
My point exactly
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 03:08 PM
  #15  
boostinpsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Reno
never use l/km ever again.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:53 PM.