Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Evo X review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 10:55 AM
  #166  
sblvro's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
Originally Posted by blitzkrieg79
Jeezzz, I am with Vigo on this one, Evo as a rally machine ended on Evo VI, what we got here in States as an Evo VII was a heavy, bloated car, with plenty of electronic aids BUT it still was a great performance car even in a stock form. Of course people in US think that Evo began at VII when in fact it has a much longer history than that.
read again!
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #167  
tweakdsm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
thank god im not even thinking about getting one, sticking with my 05 4ever! z
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #168  
mofoSTI's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: springtuckey, OR
I wonder how much power the new tranny and block can take? I am shocked its that much slower, but still very good. I cant wait to drive one.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #169  
VRamirez2004's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Ontario,CA.
LOL this is funny dont people remember especially Ix owners how slow their car were with the rev limiter?? I noticed a good difference when I disconnected mine and launched my car at 6K RPM ... I want to see the car on a dyno and see some real numbers then you can compare to the evo VIII or IX.

Oh and I dont like the evo X and am definitely not a fanboy...
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #170  
DeeezNuuuts83's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 26
From: Southern California
A lot of you guys are really crying over nothing. Car & Driver isn't always the best at generating the greatest numbers. Just take a look at this:

http://www.caranddriver.com/previews...ion-page2.html

This is an article of their first test drive of the original 271 hp Evo to come to the U.S. While the figures were just estimates based on their experience driving the car, they estimated a 0-60 mph time in 5.4 seconds with a quarter-mile time in 14.2 seconds at 98 mph. And how off they were, once the real reviews started rolling in. (Also note that they tested an Evo VI and only managed 5.1 seconds in its original-spec.) And let's not forget both Motor Trend and Road & Track, both of whom managed 0-60 times in 4.6 and 4.8 seconds, respectively, in the same spec Evo.

And acceleration numbers aside, their methods for other tests are different as well. I don't completely remember, but I believe their skidpad ratings are around a different diameter circle plus they measure braking from 70-0 versus the 60-0 tests that most other magazines do.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #171  
Kooldino's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Originally Posted by Rich EVO MR SE
It's slower and has less responsive steering. Wow.........That sucks.
Agreed.

Slower isn't a big deal...I'm an expert at fixing that, but I really liked the 8's fast steering rack.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #172  
Kooldino's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Originally Posted by DeeezNuuuts83
A lot of you guys are really crying over nothing. Car & Driver isn't always the best at generating the greatest numbers. Just take a look at this:

http://www.caranddriver.com/previews...ion-page2.html

This is an article of their first test drive of the original 271 hp Evo to come to the U.S. While the figures were just estimates based on their experience driving the car, they estimated a 0-60 mph time in 5.4 seconds with a quarter-mile time in 14.2 seconds at 98 mph. And how off they were, once the real reviews started rolling in. (Also note that they tested an Evo VI and only managed 5.1 seconds in its original-spec.) And let's not forget both Motor Trend and Road & Track, both of whom managed 0-60 times in 4.6 and 4.8 seconds, respectively, in the same spec Evo.

And acceleration numbers aside, their methods for other tests are different as well. I don't completely remember, but I believe their skidpad ratings are around a different diameter circle plus they measure braking from 70-0 versus the 60-0 tests that most other magazines do.
Yeah, that's one thing I kept in mind as well...the old men from Car & Driver can't drive to save their lives. I remember one issue I had showed the Evo 8 MR running a mid 14 second quarter mile, which I knew first hand was horse****.

So it's probably pretty comparable to a current evo in a straight line, but as they say, it turns even better.

But like I said, making power out of these cars isn't hard. You'll see quite a few fast evo Xs with a SpeedCircuit logo on the side of them.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ant_turbo
ECU Flash
3
Feb 1, 2017 08:15 AM
bluebyu36
Evo X General
5
May 9, 2008 06:14 PM
qbushido
Northeast Region
15
Sep 14, 2004 06:38 PM
purecoda
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
11
Sep 27, 2003 02:36 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:12 PM.