Evo X took a step back!
Evo X took a step back!
Its slower and fatter than the freakin VIII! WTF! This evo BETTER respond to mods better than the VIII and IX!!
We will see?!
We will see?!
Last edited by APEX1; Oct 2, 2007 at 07:52 AM.
Evolving Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Los angeles
You guys are idiots if you think 0-60 is all that matters.
There is a bunch of other things that makes the car good, and being 39% or whatevers stiffer says alot. We don't know about its modding potential yet, so lets not jump to conclusions. You swear you can feel a difference between 4.8 and 5.0.
People think they can feel tenths of seconds that is freaking ridiculous
There is a bunch of other things that makes the car good, and being 39% or whatevers stiffer says alot. We don't know about its modding potential yet, so lets not jump to conclusions. You swear you can feel a difference between 4.8 and 5.0.
People think they can feel tenths of seconds that is freaking ridiculous
Trending Topics
hmmm...they are saying 2 seconds faster around a certain track vs an evo 9 stock for stock. Motor Trend got a .97g on the skidpad. It may be porkier and a bit slower in the straight line, but hot damn this is looking like a big improvement on a track with turns. Sounds good to me, and this coming from a straight line fan.
You guys are idiots if you think 0-60 is all that matters.
There is a bunch of other things that makes the car good, and being 39% or whatevers stiffer says alot. We don't know about its modding potential yet, so lets not jump to conclusions. You swear you can feel a difference between 4.8 and 5.0.
People think they can feel tenths of seconds that is freaking ridiculous
There is a bunch of other things that makes the car good, and being 39% or whatevers stiffer says alot. We don't know about its modding potential yet, so lets not jump to conclusions. You swear you can feel a difference between 4.8 and 5.0.
People think they can feel tenths of seconds that is freaking ridiculous
(yes I am making assumptions, the X is ugly no thanks)
Last edited by konad; Oct 1, 2007 at 11:15 PM.
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: san jose ca
Like it or not, new car buyers are wanting more refinement and luxury, even in their sports cars. Go take a look at any new Porsche and Ferrari; then find one from even 10 yrs ago and you will see what I mean. Those cars have turned from hardcore sports offerings to nice everyday luxury sports cars. If you want a true race machine there will always be companies like Lotus, Noble, Ariel, etc.
Evolving Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Los angeles
It may not be the end of the world but it is considered a step in the wrong direction for some of the current evo owners. I like the original through 9 because it is a raw lean mean sports sedan. The X looks more rounded and german and the added weight makes me think it will feel that way too, even if it is faster around a track. I'm sure the new "classy" attitude will sell more evo's but its just not for me, If i was in the market for something similar to the X I'd pork up the extra cash and get a 335i and start working on the suspension.
(yes I am making assumptions, the X is ugly no thanks)
(yes I am making assumptions, the X is ugly no thanks)
Im not defending the X because i am buying one no no. I am far from getting one i am just defending it because threads like these have been made thousands of times and its getting old.
I really dont care if you think the X is ugly, i was just saying 0-60 doesn't constitute a ****ty car which most of the haters are thinking.
My point is don't write the car off before you've driven one because i can gaurantee you, you won't feel the difference between your 9s 0-60 and the X 0-60.
Evolving Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: orlando