Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

2007 Evolution boost pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #16  
NurSpecSupport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: AZ
I'm sure someone will come out with a rotated mount. That was one thing that I love about the 4G63, the manifold and turbo are right up front.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #17  
EvilRob's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by chet
given the turbo location...i'm wondering how difficult it will be to squeeze a 35R+ sized turbo in there.
Shouldn't be too much trouble if you can get under the car. The new Lancer GTS have plenty of room behind the engine so getting underneath the car should help getting to it.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:06 AM
  #18  
LoBoost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach CA
i also liked the fact the turbo was up front,we'll just have to get creative on new turbos and piping.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #19  
Lowness's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Texas
what turbo is the X using? is it still a 16G?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #20  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by Lowness
what turbo is the X using? is it still a 16G?
no, an IHI - which usually means very quick spool but a lot less top end and probably limited boost pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #21  
epshtielsl's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: NoVA / VaTech
Originally Posted by chet
given the turbo location...i'm wondering how difficult it will be to squeeze a 35R+ sized turbo in there.
Why leave the turbo back there when you can always relocate it?




K-series engines have the same layout as the 4B11 (intake manifold in the front, exhaust in the back) and many people prefer to relocate the turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #22  
NurSpecSupport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: AZ
I bet it will take a good 3-4 months before someone develops a free flowing solution that is both gives great power gains and is cost effective.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #23  
jetmn's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
no, an IHI - which usually means very quick spool but a lot less top end and probably limited boost pressure.

It is not using an IHI turbo, that would be stupid. Mitsu is going to use a Mitsu turbo. It isn't a full 16g, actually like a 15.2g if I remember right, but the exhaust side is bigger. Just because the wheel isn't as big of diameter doesn't mean it won't flow more. It should help with spool though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hktrigguy
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
6
Jun 16, 2017 05:23 PM
minimarine09
For Sale - Interior / Exterior / Sound / Styling
0
Mar 14, 2017 11:55 AM
06MRV8Killer
Evo General
16
May 19, 2011 07:26 AM
Mitchubishievo
Midwest Region
3
Oct 25, 2008 07:36 AM
tboboy
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
10
Sep 2, 2008 08:34 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:31 AM.