Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

evo XI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #1  
lancerzdropped's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Ontario,CA
evo XI?

Dont get me wrong I dont have a problem with the current EVO but why doesnt mitsu use a 2.5 liter engine? If a 2.0 does wonders imagine the capabilities.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #2  
Import Junky's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 0
From: Lansdale
been discussed before. Mitsu keeps the 2.0 because of the WRC rules. In Japan the STI still have a 2.0. Only here in the states does it get the 2.5
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 10:03 AM
  #3  
dsycks's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
From: Logan Ohio, USA
cost. it takes a lot of cash to develop a new motor
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #4  
Evoovasti's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: NY
yes what ^^^^said and do you really want to be that much like sti's
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #5  
CharlesJ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 1
From: FL
Slightly off topic, but most auto journalists actually prefer the STI 2.0l engine to our 2.5. It revs better, has a better turbo, and sounds better. I believe its also built stronger.

But what the previous posters said is all correct. Doesnt mean its out of the question to go higher displacement, but rather there are reasons why they would not
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
Vostok 7's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by CharlesJ
Slightly off topic, but most auto journalists actually prefer the STI 2.0l engine to our 2.5. It revs better, has a better turbo, and sounds better. I believe its also built stronger.

But what the previous posters said is all correct. Doesnt mean its out of the question to go higher displacement, but rather there are reasons why they would not
+1. The 2.5l was kind of a surprise for the US market, but honestly was totally unnecessary.

Besides, the 4G63 was 2.0l and was easier to make more power on than the EJ25. Smaller engines rev better which can equate to better power bands too.

Not only that but 2.0ls get surprisingly better gas mileage (my Evo gets 27-28, my STi's best was barely cracking 26)

- Patrick
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #7  
bhamEVOguy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham,WA
everything thats been said above and there is no evo xi just yet. we have iX's and x is just coming out. just wanted to clarify that
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #8  
Vostok 7's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by bhamEVOguy
everything thats been said above and there is no evo xi just yet. we have iX's and x is just coming out. just wanted to clarify that
I think he was saying the XI should have a 2.5l.

- Patrick
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 02:21 PM
  #9  
bhamEVOguy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham,WA
Originally Posted by Vostok 7
I think he was saying the XI should have a 2.5l.

- Patrick

gotcha!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 12:26 AM
  #10  
Kordyte's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Nah, maybe they'll think about that for the XIII. They do cars in 3's. Still, the main reason is the rally rules, and the whole if-it-aint-broke-don't-fix-it thing.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2008 | 04:34 AM
  #11  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
because its a RALLY car and the rally regulates the engine size for 2 l. Why is so hard even after 5 years to understand that? It is not a drag car... It's build and designed to be a rally car. The groupe "N". So that is way NOT so important every where else in the world /where is the real market for the Evo/ How it does on 1/4 miles... Since the rally is usually on widing and curvie roads with bad surfaces....
Also the 2 L. STI engine is WAY better then the 2.5 L.

Last edited by Robevo RS; Jan 11, 2008 at 04:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #12  
FloopyDisk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 595
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
The hemoglobalion rules for WRC state the car must use a 2.0L, besides dude...we have Evos pushing over 1000whp, I haven't seen a 2.5L Subby do that one yet.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #13  
SneezyIX's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
XI......... time to go back to the future lol
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #14  
Vostok 7's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by FloopyDisk
The hemoglobalion rules for WRC state the car must use a 2.0L, besides dude...we have Evos pushing over 1000whp, I haven't seen a 2.5L Subby do that one yet.
There's Subarus that do that, they just blow up more often

Subie guys will say that the EJ25 can run 500+hp on the stock block and stock internals "reliably", the question is just "how long" With the 4G63 that's just scratching the surface. Iron block for the win.

- Patrick
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 08:44 AM
  #15  
ColdEvolution8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Naples, Florida
Rally Spec Rules and that's the way it stayed. Except for Subaru, which in turn still runs the 2.0 in Japan.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:33 PM.