Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Not good news on mitsu future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 07:37 PM
  #106  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
everyone, stop concentrating on the Chevy so much! the RA lost to 6 other cars as well, in 2 separate magazines!!!!!
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #107  
GNR's Avatar
GNR
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
RA lost because it had AWD, dual clutch tranny( others didnt come with auto, try testing the other cars with auto), and also RA was the heaviest one there I bet.. I wanna to see who will come out on top doing top speed runs on straight, then first turn lose control and do an 360, double flip and see which car the driver lives.. Thats why the ralliart was built to survive...
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #108  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by S6devil
everyone, stop concentrating on the Chevy so much! the RA lost to 6 other cars as well, in 2 separate magazines!!!!!


You just don't get it. If you actually read the comparisons instead of only looking at the finishing order you wouldn't have said things like:

"between walking and taking the city bus."
"now 2 magazines hate the RA"

Which is just flat out wrong.
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #109  
HondaHunter78's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Those magazines always hate on mitsu. Mitsu is always the underestimated underdog.
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 11:13 AM
  #110  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
yes i do read, every word my friend.

fine, u r right, they dont hate it. not at all. they just consistently rate it 7th or 8th...
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #111  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by HondaHunter78
Those magazines always hate on mitsu. Mitsu is always the underestimated underdog.
not true!!
most mags loved the Evo VIII and IX. for years mags claimed the Evo was a better performing and more enjoyable car than the Sti.
The Evo was the segment leader, till the X showed its fat, slow and expensive snout
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #112  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by S6devil
not true!!
most mags loved the Evo VIII and IX. for years mags claimed the Evo was a better performing and more enjoyable car than the Sti.
The Evo was the segment leader, till the X showed its fat, slow and expensive snout
I haven't seen much bad press about the X either. The consensus I've gotten is that it is a little slower in straight line speed, but it is a better handler. It won this comparo:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...omparison_test

So it is still the segment leader. It is more often compared to itself or former self, actually then other cars.

http://www.motortrend.com/av/roadtes...son/index.html

So again, I really don't see how you can draw these conclusions after actually reading these articles. Please share the ones that show the X to be dethroned from segment leader because its slow, fat and expensive.
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 12:17 PM
  #113  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
no matter how many articles i show, its still an Evo forum. what else could i possibly expect to hear on it, other than mitsubishi is great, all else is bad.

i just referred u to 2 separate tests, being conducted 3 months apart, by 2 individual magazines, both placing the RA dead last, or next to last. and still people dismissed the results, and claimed magazine bias and favoritism. so why would i waste a minute more looking for an article about the X ??? no matter what, u, and others will still deny it, or find an excuse.
bad tires, heavy driver, bad weather, bad mood....
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #114  
dboz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Originally Posted by GPTourer
I haven't seen much bad press about the X either.
The Autoweek Long Term update stated that the MR SST enthusiasm was starting to wane and that it was concerning how the trans would shift mid turn and jolt the car. They also said potholes were still very jarring and was getting old.
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #115  
GNR's Avatar
GNR
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Must be the stiff suspension, ask them to live with an lamberghin gallado?
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #116  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
Originally Posted by S6devil
not true!!
most mags loved the Evo VIII and IX. for years mags claimed the Evo was a better performing and more enjoyable car than the Sti.
The Evo was the segment leader, till the X showed its fat, slow and expensive snout
My dealer is selling x's with the lip kit for 32k. The gsr 03 I had was 33k. It's not really that expensive imo. Unless they're marking them up in other places or something. They are heavier though.
Old Feb 7, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #117  
Cyp's Avatar
Cyp
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: N. California
Originally Posted by S6devil
no matter how many articles i show, its still an Evo forum. what else could i possibly expect to hear on it, other than mitsubishi is great, all else is bad.

i just referred u to 2 separate tests, being conducted 3 months apart, by 2 individual magazines, both placing the RA dead last, or next to last. and still people dismissed the results, and claimed magazine bias and favoritism. so why would i waste a minute more looking for an article about the X ??? no matter what, u, and others will still deny it, or find an excuse.
bad tires, heavy driver, bad weather, bad mood....
You are sooo right! good job buddy. Glad your bringing all of this to our attention. Well, looks like you will find yourself more at home at a lexus or mercedes Forum.
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 08:17 AM
  #118  
S6devil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: NYC
^ well for one, the average age is certainly higher there
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 08:27 AM
  #119  
sblvro's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
I agree with s6 on this one. the ralliart is suppose to showcase the mitsu racing heritage since previous evo's were made by the ralliart division of mitsu in japan. But the ralliart has no bite at all and deadlast in all the comparo test. I was surprised that C/D picked the evo to win the Sti battle time and time again but it is because they liked the evo so much
Old Feb 8, 2009 | 08:51 AM
  #120  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
IMO, the ralliart was a huge failure. Mainly because of price, second because you're forced to use the SST. The SST is great for some people (heavy traffic, don't know how to use a stick)... but it didn't perform the way we thought it would on paper. Has sluggish shifts randomly, gets confused which gear to be in on certain RPMs, very costly to replace. With that being said, it's not just the SST that made the Ralliart a non competitor. I think the biggest thing has going against it this year is weight. You're supposed to LOSE weight not add it. Heavy cars only appeal to luxury people. If could really get their cars on a weight loss diet, they would be some major contenders. One thing is for sure, is advertising like crazy. Everywhere I go I see marketing. That WILL pay off in the end. I think if was really planning on closing their doors they would scale back marketing before closing. I think they will be around a while longer.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:41 PM.