Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Road and Track MR short writeup with Pics!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 06:53 PM
  #46  
Mister2zx3's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
The MR weighs 13 pounds more than than the 03 Evo? wow.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #47  
Jovani's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale, Fl
Anyone else notice in the engine pic it looks like we're not getting the MR aluminum BOV but the regular plastic one.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #48  
The Bear's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by 4ce fed
I have a subscription. The STi weighs in at 3290 lbs. In the end, they pick the MR as the overall winner.

Ah.. Well thanks for sharing the info. Barnes & Nobles probably had it in the back but didn't offer to go get me a copy, they had no Motor Trend on the shelves.. I'll just have to wait a bit to go pick it up..

I'm kind of surprised at the weight, must be the ACD and 6 spd. I wonder what the 05 GSRs will weigh.

I'm guessing there is still no official info on MSRP as well?

Last edited by The Bear; Aug 31, 2004 at 07:53 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #49  
cmf's Avatar
cmf
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by The Bear
I'm not positive about this but I think some people may get confused about the AYC. It isn't like AYC on an evos, it is a sensor that uses braking to slow down the wheels with less traction. While the AYC on evos will actually send more power to wheels with most traction, making it a positive force rather than a negative one.
Not exactly. The 2005 Sti has two systems: one for braking and one for the center diff. The ABS has a "lateral G sensor" that helps account for over/understeer when braking (i.e., out-of-control situations). The STi also now has a "yaw rate sensor" that ties into the center diff to re-route power fore and aft depending on what the car is doing. So, in a nutshell, the STi has loads more "active" crap going on that the USDM Evos do, since none of them comes with Mitsu's SAYC that other regions get standard.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #50  
EVIL MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO
also only the MR gets HID light as stander all other evo dose not
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #51  
cmf's Avatar
cmf
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by The Bear
I'm kind of surprised at the weight, must be the ACD and 6 spd. I wonder what the 05 GSRs will weigh.
I bet the MR ends up weighing more than the GSR, since the weight gained from the 6-speed and all that extra MR badging will be more than what's saved through the aluminum roof. Of course, the weight from the tranny is down low and the roof is up high, so despite it being heavier, it's probably distributed better than the GSR. Just a guess.

No surprise on MT picking the Evo. They love the car and would probably pick it even if it didn't win any of the performance specs just because the seats are so awesome.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 08:48 PM
  #52  
EVIL MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO
no the MR IS 157 pound lighter then 2005 evo
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 08:50 PM
  #53  
cmf's Avatar
cmf
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
So now the GSR weighs 3430 lbs?? How is that possible???????? That's like 140 lbs. MORE than the STi! That doesn't seem right.

Last edited by cmf; Aug 31, 2004 at 08:53 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #54  
MisterSpoot's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: New Bedford, MA
Originally Posted by EVIL MR
no the MR IS 157 pound lighter then 2005 evo
Originally Posted by Mister2zx3
The MR weighs 13 pounds more than than the 03 Evo? wow.
I don't have the '03 official numbers, however...

2004 Evolution VIII RS .................. 3175 (source: Mitsubishi Motors)
2004 Evolution VIII ....................... 3263 (source: Mitsubishi Motors)
2005 Evolution VIII MR Edition ....... 3273 (source: Motor Trend)
2004 Evolution VIII w/ sunroof ..... 3321 (source: Mitsubishi Motors)

----- -----

Getting the '05 MR down to the '04 RS's weight is trivial.

Last edited by MisterSpoot; Aug 31, 2004 at 08:55 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #55  
The Bear's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by MisterSpoot
I don't have the '03 official numbers, however...

2004 Evolution VIII RS .................. 3175 (source: Mitsubishi Motors)
2004 Evolution VIII ....................... 3263 (source: Mitsubishi Motors)
2005 Evolution VIII MR Edition ....... 3273 (source: Motor Trend)
2004 Evolution VIII w/ sunroof ..... 3321 (source: Mitsubishi Motors)

----- -----

Getting the '05 MR down to the '04 RS's weight is trivial.

I think it was Motor Trend who got exactly 3263 with both the STI and Evo last time around as well, so the numbers are probably right on. I'm surprised with how much the ACD must weigh.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 09:14 PM
  #56  
MisterSpoot's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: New Bedford, MA
Curb weight of the '03 Evolution VIII was also 3263 lbs.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 04:03 AM
  #57  
4ce fed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 1
From: AL
Motor Trend estimates the MSRP to be $34,900 for the MR. Due to the ECU mapping and more torque over a wide area, there is far less turbo lag than current Evos. Weird, though. It gains 5 HP from a bigger exhaust housing, but the boost is also upped to 20.3 psi.? Seems like it should be more than 5 HP.

It should be noted, though, that the only reason the MR tied the 0-60 times is because the STi tops out at 58mph in 2nd gear, so a shift to 3rd was necessary. The MR hit 60 in 2nd gear.

The MR has some built-in 2 stage rev limiter. Any time the clutch is pressed in, the limiter drops to 5K rpms. So that might hurt drag racing, depending on how the driver launches. I don't see it as a down side, though, since the MR isn't really a drag car. It might be good for a no-lift-to-shift feature.

Although the MR beat the STi in every test they did, they said the STi was much easier (and fun, in some cases) to drive. They also said the STI seemed a good bit slower than previous STi's they've tested. The MR put down 239 HP, whle the STI put down 233 HP.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 04:49 AM
  #58  
modvp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
How do the handling (of both cars) compare?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 04:52 AM
  #59  
4ce fed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 1
From: AL
The MR lapped Willow Springs at 1:34.38. The STi at 1:35.37.

600ft slalom, MR 70.1mph, STi 69.7

skidpad, MR .92, STi .90
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 06:01 AM
  #60  
cmf's Avatar
cmf
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 4ce fed
They also said the STI seemed a good bit slower than previous STi's they've tested.
So we're STILL waiting for an accurate head-to-head comparison???
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 PM.