Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

If someone has the new motor trend!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 08:18 PM
  #61  
93civEJ1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 0
From: TN
i plan on keeping my BBY 03' baby.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #62  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
All I want is the TURBO AND WASTE GATE OFF the MR THATS IT.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #63  
erikgj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by zstryder
Lots of rally teams run the stock BOV. And you know how many horses those cars are pushing?

Anyway, I'm sure it helps slightly, but the uprated BOV is for SURE not the main reason why the MR is a better car.
About 350 hp, group N less than that.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 08:41 PM
  #64  
The Bear's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by ttype86
Well, I prefer it to whip it stock....I'm really bummed that they didn't give it they're all...guess I'll keep my $$$ and see what the Evo IX is like.

Wow, how fast 0-60 and 1/4 mile do you want? Sub 5 second 0-60 is very fast, for under $50,000 you may be waiting for a long time. These cars weren't made for street racing, the Evo beats the STI where it matters, in handling. Maybe you should look into a Camaro SS or Mustang Cobra, if you can afford it just get a Porche GT3. The Porche will give you .5 sec on the STI but for 3 times the price

Last edited by The Bear; Sep 1, 2004 at 08:43 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #65  
erikgj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 1
My guess is that the STi is tuned more conservatively than the '04 STi to eliminate the detonation issue they had.



If the Evo is a ringer how do I specify my MR to get the ringer package?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #66  
v8killer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
From: Tampa FL
I have an MotorTrend subscription and I don;t have mine yet... We usually get them a couple days early. Doesn't surprise me that the MR figures are almost identical... 5hp is nothing, one more cog, in most cases isn't much, lighter roof big deal, AYC well you would think this would help the slalom numbers but I don't see a diff. Yep I am happy with the regular old Evo VIII. Although if I was buying today all over again I guess I would get the MR anyway, but let's just see that sticker MSRP...

BTW, whoever had the magazine, what wads the MSRP listed for the MR and the STI, or were they estimated?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #67  
cmf's Avatar
cmf
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Prices are as follows:
STi: Base MSRP = $32,770; Price as tested = $33,698
MR: Base MSRP and Price as tested both estimated to be $34,900

Given that pretty much nobody pays over $32,000 for their STi's, the final negotiated sales prices for the MR will be very interesting.

BTW, the article appears in a special issue of Motor Trend (2005 & 2006 New Cars issue), *not* the October issue.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 09:54 PM
  #68  
Acerxz's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Yonkers,NY
Evo MR $34.900 (est) STI $32,770 base $33,698 as tested
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 10:31 PM
  #69  
Conduit's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
So with dealer markup, the MR is going to end up being 3-5k more than the STi? Yuck. No way I'm paying more than MSRP on an MR...for $37-38K I'll just look elsewhere.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2004 | 11:16 PM
  #70  
D1_EVO8's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
here is the issue that "CMF" is talking about.. look under "road tests"
http://www.motortrend.com/toc/thismonth/



Originally Posted by cmf
Prices are as follows:
STi: Base MSRP = $32,770; Price as tested = $33,698
MR: Base MSRP and Price as tested both estimated to be $34,900

Given that pretty much nobody pays over $32,000 for their STi's, the final negotiated sales prices for the MR will be very interesting.

BTW, the article appears in a special issue of Motor Trend (2005 & 2006 New Cars issue), *not* the October issue.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #71  
ttype86's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by The Bear
Wow, how fast 0-60 and 1/4 mile do you want? Sub 5 second 0-60 is very fast, for under $50,000 you may be waiting for a long time. These cars weren't made for street racing, the Evo beats the STI where it matters, in handling. Maybe you should look into a Camaro SS or Mustang Cobra, if you can afford it just get a Porche GT3. The Porche will give you .5 sec on the STI but for 3 times the price
Low 4's and high 12's respectively. An SS or Cobra??? Hence the name...'86 T-Type, and it came out in late '85 with a 0-60 at 4.9 for about $15K. So I don't think I'm asking for too much. But don't get me wrong...we can't go by what 1 mag says...I drive it and see for myself.

Last edited by ttype86; Sep 4, 2004 at 08:02 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 08:31 PM
  #72  
MisterSpoot's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: New Bedford, MA
You're comparing an Evolution to a Buick Regal T-Type? The car could do only one thing well by today's standards -- straight-line acceleration. Additionally, the high 12's in the T-Type if I recalled pretty much required a flawless launch at sea level (stock).

Furthermore, $15,000 in 1985 does not equal $15,000 today. Today that car would be hovering around $30,000. 20 years of inflation will do that.

Evolutions are not drag cars. They really, really aren't. If you want a drag car, although the Evolution could do the job, it's expensive and you're much better off searching for an old T-Type or Grand National, a 2003 SVT Mustang Cobra, Firebird Trans-Am, etc. The Evolution will not do it as cost effective as those cars.

The Evolution's first priority is handling, second would be handling, and third would be handling. Acceleration and braking round it out, and just serve to complement handling to round out the package.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #73  
legal-z's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Deland, FL
Originally Posted by ttype86
Low 4's and high 12's respectively. An SS or Cobra??? Hence the name...'86 T-Type, and it came out in late '85 with a 0-60 at 4.9 for about $15K. So I don't think I'm asking for too much. But don't get me wrong...we can't go by what 1 mag says...I drive it and see for myself.
let's hope there's not a corner or bump on your way to that 60mph dash in your t-type. oh, and by the way, the styling is gorgeous. i admit an evo isn't the best looking car ever, but comparing it and a t-type is quite silly. also, i'd love to translate 15,000 1986 dollars into the equivalent of the current dollar value and i'll bet your t-type would cost about $45k today... and it's a buick... and it has that beautiful bench seat... and it's a buick (oh yeah, i already said that)... and when it comes time to stop that tank i'm sure it will brake from 60 in less than 300 feet.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #74  
legal-z's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Deland, FL
Originally Posted by ttype86
I'm really bummed that they didn't give it they're all
...and that must be that buick exhaust distorting your use of the english language:
they're=they are
their=possessive of they (i.e., the word you were looking for)
there=a place
keep up the good work and snap us a pic of those raised whites on that t-type so we can all envy you.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #75  
EVO Neil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Scot
that is the old test....not the new one with the STI vs Evo.
Exactly and that '03 Evo was tested at a different location known for great traction, not our regular location, so the numbers are always better. IThat Top Speed test was at the Ford Proving Grounds in Kingman, AZ.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:33 AM.