Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

Optimal timing???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #16  
vroomevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
i am datalogging with both Evoscan and ECU plus. ECU plus has own dyno feature and it's quite consistance with mod and changes in ecu flash.
it even has own map tracer!! loads are calculated loads but...at least you have an idea where to look for on load column.

can't get above 2 degrees of timing during peak torque which is around 4.4K.
but higher rpm, my timings are in 19-20's.

i guess i will advance more timing now...
one degree at a time...
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #17  
Ralph's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: N/A
Originally Posted by vroomevo
i am datalogging with both Evoscan and ECU plus. ECU plus has own dyno feature and it's quite consistance with mod and changes in ecu flash.
it even has own map tracer!! loads are calculated loads but...at least you have an idea where to look for on load column.

can't get above 2 degrees of timing during peak torque which is around 4.4K.
but higher rpm, my timings are in 19-20's.

i guess i will advance more timing now...
one degree at a time...

Follow NJ's guide and you'll be fine
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #18  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
Originally Posted by vroomevo
2 degrees of timing during peak torque which is around 4.4K.
This doesn't sound right at all ... That seems really low for timing at peak on meth. Also, unless you've changed the turbo to something quite large, peak torque should be around 3500 or less.

Is there some extra info you haven't mentioned?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 12:44 PM
  #19  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by lemmonhead
to get an accurate torque/hp.
On a proper dyno (like a dynodynamics) you can see the power, torque, boost, afr all in real time so if anything is going wrong you can abort instantly rather than waiting till you have a chance to look at your laptop.

Plus, road tuning is not the safest thing in the world.

Not saying you cannot get a good tune using datalogs and road tuning, but it is much quicker and safer to use a good dyno.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #20  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
MP, I'm not sure he would even reach MBT on pump with a meth/water mix. I think it's safe for him to street tune and just back off when he finds a little knock. Of course, he needs to take it slow.

Yeah, that is true...

By the way i run around 2* at peak torque as well. That's on E85 at 28psi... My engine does not like any more than that.. And then it goes up to 21-22 by redline.
Some people get away with 8*, i never could come even close to that, wether on reg gas or E85. I write it off on engines' differences.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #21  
vroomevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
This doesn't sound right at all ... That seems really low for timing at peak on meth. Also, unless you've changed the turbo to something quite large, peak torque should be around 3500 or less.

Is there some extra info you haven't mentioned?
evo8 with evo9 turbo, and invidia o2 housing, and 272/272 cams.
i am advancing more timing around peak torque RPM region.
we will see how it goes.

btw, i disabled lean spool up, i was in lik high 13's, and 14's during spool up, though lean condition was the cause for the knock around spool up/torque area.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #22  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
Just a note ... different tuners do things differently. I tune boost first, then fuel then timing. This allows me to nail down the load range I'm tuning first. Then, I set the fuel curve exactly how I like it. Then I increase timing advance for power.

The cams might be why you can run so little advance at peak torque, but you should still spool quicker than 4400. Given, I drive a IX, but I can hit 24 psi in 4th at 3100 RPM. Without MIVEC, you should be there @ 3800 at the latest ... especially with the AFRs you should be running with meth. And, honestly, thats a very generous allowance for spool time.

Have you checked for boost leaks?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #23  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
There is absolutely no such thing as optimal timing in the sense that you are depicting. Dynamic variables effect this type of theory.
Increasing timing isn't always the answer nor is decreasing the lead. It will depend on MANY variables. Please do not take offense to this but if you are asking this question in this manner, my suggestion would be to consult with an educated tuner near you.
Just my two cents.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #24  
cfdfireman1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
This is what..

I'm talking about. Get you AFR's in check before you mess with anything else. "13.0 during peak torque" is not "rich as hell" And what he said^^

Originally Posted by vroomevo
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ming+injection

i recently read the above thread and some guys are running 20+ timing with injection.
i am using 50/50 meth/water, set boost at 1.7-1.8 bar, still tapers down to 1.4-5bar at redline, 2byte/ecu load in 280-290's peak, drops to around 240-260's.
haven't touched the AFR yet, but rich as hell, 13.0 during peak torque and drops to 10.3 at redline.

my question is this....

i see my timing upto 20's at redline without any knocks. progressively advancing without any retardation.
so, should I continue to advance timing???
if you read 'how to tune evo' in ECU flash forum, nj1266 mentioned to tune timing first before fuel table. b/c if you change timing, then it will change afr(not a exact quote but that's what nj1266 is suggesting...)

so going back to my question... is there optimal timing?? or can i still advance it??
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #25  
vroomevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by cfdfireman1
I'm talking about. Get you AFR's in check before you mess with anything else. "13.0 during peak torque" is not "rich as hell" And what he said^^
right, i am happy with 13's during peak torque, maybe i can lean out just a little bit more but...10.3 at redline with 50meth/50water, i think it's really rich.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 10:34 PM
  #26  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
Spool up at ~13:1 and get to 12.5:1 at peak torque. Hold that 12.5:1 till about 5500 then taper down to 12.2:1 at 7000. THEN set your timing.

Don't go leaner than 13:1 on meth. Meth will actually lower your stoichiometric ratio, so you need to think in lambda here. .87 lambda (your ideal target) is 12.8 for gasoline and 5.6 for Methanol.

If you are adding, say, 10% meth to your fuel mixture (just an estimate), your target would ideally be 12.07:1. Just something to consider ...

I'm not sure how water comes in to play here though since hydrogen has a very high stoichiometric ratio ...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 04:48 AM
  #27  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Originally Posted by vroomevo
right, i am happy with 13's during peak torque, maybe i can lean out just a little bit more but...10.3 at redline with 50meth/50water, i think it's really rich.
13. at "peak torque" or in your case 1.7-1.8 bar is not AT ALL safe by any means. Your fuel curve , notice I didn't say line, should show similarities to your VE curve.
Again good luck but IMHO you are headed for a meltdown sooner than later.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #28  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by vroomevo
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ming+injection

iif you read 'how to tune evo' in ECU flash forum, nj1266 mentioned to tune timing first before fuel table. b/c if you change timing, then it will change afr(not a exact quote but that's what nj1266 is suggesting...)

so going back to my question... is there optimal timing?? or can i still advance it??
You misunderstood what I said. The reason I start with timing is because of 91 octane gas. On 91 octane gas the Evo knocks with factory timing. So I start with timing to eliminate knock. If I start with increasing the boost and leaning the AFR, then the car would knock when setting these two parameters. Why put so much stress on the engine? Start with a conservative timing map.

Since you are running meth+water, then you do not have that problem. So set your timing CONSERVATIVELY first. The key word is CONSERVATIVE. That will give you room to lean out the AFR and up the boost w/o knocking.

Simply advancing the timing is NOT the way to go. You have three parameters to keep in mind when tuning an Evo, boost, timing and AFR. When tuning one parameter, you MUST keep in mind the other two.

So here is what you should do:

1. Set timing to a conservative number. I would say 15-16 by redline and work back from there.
2. Set the target boost. I have no idea what boost you can run with meth.
3. Set the AFR after you set the boost. Follow the numbers that Touring Bubble suggested.
4. Go back and see how much timing advance you can get away with w/o knock.

You started with number 4 and skipped 1, 2, and 3.

Last edited by nj1266; Nov 6, 2007 at 09:18 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #29  
cfdfireman1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
I'm glad you're...

..happy, but I'll bet your car isn't.

Originally Posted by vroomevo
right, i am happy with 13's during peak torque, maybe i can lean out just a little bit more but...10.3 at redline with 50meth/50water, i think it's really rich.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #30  
vroomevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by nj1266
You misunderstood what I said. The reason I start with timing is because of 91 octane gas. On 91 octane gas the Evo knocks with factory timing. So I start with timing to eliminate knock. If I start with increasing the boost and leaning the AFR, then the car would knock when setting these two parameters. Why put so much stress on the engine? Start with a conservative timing map.

Since you are running meth+water, then you do not have that problem. So set your timing CONSERVATIVELY first. The key word is CONSERVATIVE. That will give you room to lean out the AFR and up the boost w/o knocking.

Simply advancing the timing is NOT the way to go. You have three parameters to keep in mind when tuning an Evo, boost, timing and AFR. When tuning one parameter, you MUST keep in mind the other two.

So here is what you should do:

1. Set timing to a conservative number. I would say 15-16 by redline and work back from there.
2. Set the target boost. I have no idea what boost you can run with meth.
3. Set the AFR after you set the boost. Follow the numbers that Touring Bubble suggested.
4. Go back and see how much timing advance you can get away with w/o knock.

You started with number 4 and skipped 1, 2, and 3.

thanks NJ for the reply.
time to hit the road with laptop again..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skylineracer
ECU Flash
26
Jul 5, 2012 05:32 AM
10isace
ECU Flash
1
Sep 20, 2010 09:48 AM
Chasem
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
May 20, 2010 06:26 PM
sparky
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
12
Feb 3, 2007 05:58 PM
HiVoltEVO8
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
49
May 11, 2006 11:50 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:27 PM.