Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

Stage 2+ vs. Evo 8 - Round 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 09:12 AM
  #31  
grubiaco's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: central cali
This reminds me of "Mr. Duarte"
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #32  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by Shingen
Carlos isn't so much a hater as he is immature. N1te is corrrect. A modifed stage 2 lancer will pull on a stock evo. Rather than acting like your five why not just add to the debate with fact to back you up?

Fox
Thanks for your comments. I am aware that a stage II from RRM can do wonders on the lancer, I just can't comprehend what suppose to make me a hater, simply there is no reason for me to be a hater.

Carlos
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #33  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by N1te
Ever race an Srt-4? From a "ROLL!" maybe? 1/4 mile times with AWD and FWD are yes, comparisons verse eachother against the amount of time it takes for a car to get down the track but there are Supra's and Mustangs running 11 trapping at nearly 10mph faster than Evos. Why? Traction. So when you say 13's to compare to an Evo, you don't list any trap times; wonder why Evo's run 11's, but they still have lower trap speeds than a xxxhp supra running an 11 trapping at well over what the Evo does. It's completely possible for a low 14 second turbo'd lancer to pull on a mid 13 second Evo if the Lancer's trapspeeds are higher and it's a highway racer. Drivetrain loss? You wouldn't need 300hp, you'd need around 250 which is almost exactly where RRM's kit puts you.
Good points nothing new but definately a refreshener. The trap speeds on the Evo are specifically lower because of the drivetrain loss and weight involve.
Make a Evo RWD and you can reverese the formula, higher trap speeds and lower ETs.

The torque on each engine makes a whole world of differences as well. You need great torque to still be fast above 3 digit MPHs, the Evo naturally makes tons of torque considering its small displacement.

Carlos
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #34  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by RarStlzLncr
Not really I've only spent 7K - 8k and bought my Lancer for $15,700 in Nov. 2002.

EVO's were something like $30,000 then, plus I live on my own...rent, bills they add up.
Thanks for sharing all the details. At the end of the day is whatever floats your boat. Your route is the typical route that a normal person with oa lot of bills would have choosen(little by little, step by step).
Voiding high insurances quotes by claiming a lancer.. I am aware. The difference of price is to the advantage of the Evo overall because as you know the lancer still have to compare to the Evo brakes, steering, rims, tires, seats, suspension and all the good stuff that makes this car unique but at the end of the day Ii repeat that whatever floats your boat, if you can't get the Eevo now then you have to work your way around on your lancer.

Congras anyway! and remember I am not a hater.

Carlos
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 12:33 PM
  #35  
Snoogens's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: J-town, Pennslyvania
You should try the crab cakes their Phenomenal!!...haha...just thought i would lighten everyones spirits...

May Evom be at peace again. ^^sorry to go off topic
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #36  
joberk3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by cheb evo
Problem is, your drivetrain would not enable you to catch us off the line...you will be just like a stock SRT-4, which have all sorts of tractions issues off the line as everyone knows...please don't just compare power to weight ratios...remember all wheel drive traction vs. front wheel with similar power numbers and weight numbers...
sry yeah i forgot to make that tranny comparison.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #37  
thereasonsf3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
ever think about getting your car tuned to all those mods, im very sure you could get 20-30 whp from a good tune with that throttle body, intakemani, etc.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
<--MOVE OVER
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
66
Oct 7, 2011 01:10 PM
Trail Slide
Evo General
116
Nov 10, 2008 09:03 AM
XK120
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
8
Nov 7, 2006 10:35 PM
DragNRacing
Evo General
33
Sep 18, 2006 10:32 PM
Coral
Northwest Region
167
May 18, 2006 07:45 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 AM.