Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

New Edition to the RIPP SDS Lancer Family

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2004 | 07:28 AM
  #31  
bazooka614's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
dude its on their web site
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #32  
Dookie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by bazooka614
dude its on their web site
Those numbers are estimates because they have not yet dyno'd a Lancer SDS. This is coming from Ross, the owner.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #33  
fkrzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
I finally got to the track today. I only took 1 run because I got there at 3:30. 5 speed, street tire, 90 degrees and 6 psi. 15.6 @ 88 mph with alot of wheelspin. I think I can get a low 15 when I learn how to launch it better. I probably won't go back until I get the 10 psi pulley and water injection.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #34  
Dookie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Im sure it can do better than that....even only at 6 psi.

What was your 60' time?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #35  
fkrzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
60' 2.345, 330' 6.646, 1/8 10.028 @69.83
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #36  
bigvinx's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Angry yo guys !!!!!!!!!!!!!1

i just spent 3 days installing the stage 2 kit from ripp mods and today i removed it !!!!!!! nothing but problems !!!!!! spuddering backfires and totally had a bad miss and the injectors were 1/2 inch linger than stock !!!!!!!! whats that ? im lookin to get my $ back !!!!!!! anyone wana talk about it e mail me at bigvinx@comcast.net
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 06:22 PM
  #37  
fkrzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
Yes the injectors are longer, push on the fuel rail and the bolts go right in. When I first started my car it did the same thing. My 02 sensor wire was in the wrong place. I'll email you my phone # and maybe I can help you through it.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 05:58 AM
  #38  
kreeskid99's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: clovis, nm
dude a 15.6 at 88 mph is only abput 160 horses to the crank. i thought stage 1 ripp was supposed to push more than that?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 06:28 AM
  #39  
fkrzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
I only took one pass and had alot of wheelspin. I can definateley get it down to a low 15, just look at the mph. Launching the car is totaly different now. I used to sit at 3500 rpm and drop it pumping the gas a little. My best pre-sc is a 16.4 on a 40 degree night.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #40  
thereasonsf3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
duuuhh ur supposed to get larger injectors. gives you more fuel for more power.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #41  
thereasonsf3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
hmmm 15.8, is about 180-200hp at the crank not 160...on 2nd thought what does a stock ralliart run in the 1/4. compare those two's hp and 1/4 ratings to figure out what ripps non IC kit gives u at 6psi.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 06:30 PM
  #42  
fkrzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
The ralliart thing won't work because the torque curve is totally different. If you go over 90mph you could do a 14, now its about the launch. Oh and its 15.6 not 8.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 07:23 AM
  #43  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Ralliarts are already cracking into the 14's with NA setups... there are actually two to have done this. Thus you really can't place the lancer in that catagory at all in my opinion.

I will say that a 15.6 at 88 isn't impressive but the temp and only 1 pass make it hard to see any real data. At 6psi non-intercooled you should be easily 15.2 or 15 flats on street tires. That is what the turbo non-ic's are pulling and SC is supposed to be better right??

Fkrzo... for only one run you did well. At least your posting something which is more than i can say for others. Thanks bigtime for that. Just pushing down on the fuel rail isn't right though... doesn't RIPP tell you how to modify or supply you guys with some sort of realignment parts. I know "you know who" does for their stage 2 setup. It shouldn't be different for the RIPP setup. Also can you elaborate on your o2 sensor issue as there shouldn't be an issue with those that i could see. Unless the black box of RIPP's splices into that wire? Thanks again your post was well needed and much wanted for a long time now. Way to represent
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 12:16 PM
  #44  
RIPPMODS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Staten Island NY 10305
The injectors are longer but fit perfectly in the rail. There is no modifying of the fuel system at all. Once you place the injectors in the rail, you need to push them into the head, then bring down the bolts slowly and evenly.

The sputtering could be a number of things, if the O2's are not hooked up properly, the system will no longer be running as it should. If the ECU see's false numbers coming from the O2' it can richen/lean the tune accordingly.

We've installed several SDS kits on the Lancer platform, all turn key upon the completion of the install. I would say there is a problem there, but it's difficult to pin point without more info.

Feel free to come by the shop any time, and we can help you out....

15.6@88.... NOT BAD.... but the launch will kill you... as soon as boost comes on the car will spin through first, and second, killing your quarter mile times.... also if the boost cooler was in there you would gain more HP up top, helping you "pull" the quarter mile down after your spinning launch...

We've found the best way to launch these cars is by slipping the clutch out hard through first and second gear.

None the less, as Boe stated, it's a start, and hey we all have to start some where, in this case Fkrzo, bested his time by nearly a second, so he's on his way to a 14 second run....

I agree with Fkrzo, a 90mph trap speed is a solid 14sec run... on stock tires, clutch, and exhaust that’s not bad, all things considered.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 12:31 PM
  #45  
Dookie's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
LSD should make a world of difference as well!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:30 AM.