Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Dyno'd lancers list

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 06:47 PM
  #256  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
From what i've seen of E85 you can get a little bit better performance as it's like running a high octane. So timing and fuel can be better adjusted due to higher detonation resistance.

However you have to use a lot more of it to run the engine. Thus the bigger injectors. Essentially you don't get the mpg you get cheaper fuel. E85 uses about 20-30% more fuel than gasolene. At the price though you can run 3-4 times as many tanks than gasolene so it does save money.

The comment about the plastics is definately right... you've gotta change that line. The other components should work just fine though. Only concern i'd have is the plastic casing for the fuel pump sending unit. In time E-85 may eat it away... keep an eye on that.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 07:10 PM
  #257  
4g94T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
We've been running e85 for a long time now boe
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 07:25 PM
  #258  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Wow... I didn't even realize that those posts were so old. I just read up a few and then a few more and got sucked in. Shame on me... LOL
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #259  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
What are you using to measure AFR and boost/

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 07:59 PM
  #260  
4g94T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
Zeitronix and STRI digital gauge. I'm tuning via Ecuflash
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #261  
Demon_ni2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 7
From: Birmingham, AL
4g94T.. im gunna have to call you out once my cars actually on the street again. psi for psi, not just overall, cuz ill do 30psi just to prove a point.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 11:11 PM
  #262  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Originally Posted by 4g94T
Zeitronix and STRI digital gauge. I'm tuning via Ecuflash
Cool. I only trust Zeitronix!

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 10:32 AM
  #263  
Seifer780's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Did a dyno run. Did a 0-60 in 11.92 seconds and 1/4 mile with 18.78 sec @ 72.3 MPH. Max acceleration was 0.47 G's with peak HP at 117. Is this average or slow for this car?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #264  
mci2727's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 368
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by Seifer780
Did a dyno run. Did a 0-60 in 11.92 seconds and 1/4 mile with 18.78 sec @ 72.3 MPH. Max acceleration was 0.47 G's with peak HP at 117. Is this average or slow for this car?
Seems slightly slow, but if you have not modded it much then it's about right.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 05:06 PM
  #265  
WADADLIG_OZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
Originally Posted by Seifer780
Did a dyno run. Did a 0-60 in 11.92 seconds and 1/4 mile with 18.78 sec @ 72.3 MPH. Max acceleration was 0.47 G's with peak HP at 117. Is this average or slow for this car?
Auto or Manual?

If manual then that is slow.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 06:06 PM
  #266  
Seifer780's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Manual but it is 100% stock. Still slow?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2010 | 08:17 PM
  #267  
mci2727's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 368
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by Seifer780
Manual but it is 100% stock. Still slow?
Yeah it's still a little slow, but in all truthfulness it could just be your driving.
Different drivers get different results based on shifting ect.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #268  
03lances's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,714
Likes: 2
From: West Coast WA
Just thought I would update you guys here. Almost a year to the day since my last post here been rocking the turbo kit a year now. Pushing 12psi still stock internals, self tuned giving me a best unofficial read at
238whp
244wtrq

I plan on gettting dyno'ed this spring or sooner up at english racing
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2014 | 10:04 AM
  #269  
javy_4g94's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Hi guys i am from Pr i did 153whp /133tq and with no powersteering and ac belt did 158whp /136tq my 4g94 sohc lancer ES manual transmision did 14.8 at 90mph with 2.0 on 60ft and 15.0 at 93mph allmotor with headblock fulldone
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 09:00 AM
  #270  
indio84's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: aua
2005 mitsubishi lancer 4g13 1.3 liter

costum turbo kit
Stainless steel mani
evo4 Tdo5 turbo
tial 38mm wastegate
tial bov
open downpipe
front mount intercooler
fc3s rx7 440cc injectors
Aem 320 fuelpump
stock fuel rail
act hd 6puk sprung clutch
stock coils
stock cam and crank sensor
adaptronic 420d ECU
car drives better then stock in slow traffic and better on gas (mpg) then stock.
anyway we made 167whp @16psi, it had stock 61whp
Attached Thumbnails Dyno'd lancers list-1.3liter-20lancer-204g13-20fanatics-20performance.jpg   Dyno'd lancers list-4g13-20fanatics-20performance.jpg  
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 PM.