Evo Vs Oz
Nov 30, 2002, 06:30 PM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Evo Vs Oz
Year 2002
Make Mitsubishi
Model Lancer
Trim EVO VII
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 150 mph
Limited Top Speed
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 1.4 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 2.1 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 3.4 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 4.5 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 6.4 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 7.9 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 10.4 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 12.8 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 13.4 s @ 102.5 mph
100 ft, Hard Launch 2.6 s
500 ft, Hard Launch 7.2 s
0-30 mph, Soft Launch 4.8 s
0-40 mph, Soft Launch 5.5 s
0-50 mph, Soft Launch 6.9 s
0-60 mph, Soft Launch 8.0 s
0-70 mph, Soft Launch 9.7 s
0-80 mph, Soft Launch 11.3 s
0-90 mph, Soft Launch 13.8 s
0-100 mph, Soft Launch 16.1 s
1/4 mile, Soft Launch 16.7 s @ 101.9 mph
100 ft, Soft Launch 5.5 s
500 ft, Soft Launch 10.3 s
Make Mitsubishi
Model Lancer
Trim EVO VII
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 150 mph
Limited Top Speed
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 1.4 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 2.1 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 3.4 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 4.5 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 6.4 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 7.9 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 10.4 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 12.8 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 13.4 s @ 102.5 mph
100 ft, Hard Launch 2.6 s
500 ft, Hard Launch 7.2 s
0-30 mph, Soft Launch 4.8 s
0-40 mph, Soft Launch 5.5 s
0-50 mph, Soft Launch 6.9 s
0-60 mph, Soft Launch 8.0 s
0-70 mph, Soft Launch 9.7 s
0-80 mph, Soft Launch 11.3 s
0-90 mph, Soft Launch 13.8 s
0-100 mph, Soft Launch 16.1 s
1/4 mile, Soft Launch 16.7 s @ 101.9 mph
100 ft, Soft Launch 5.5 s
500 ft, Soft Launch 10.3 s
Nov 30, 2002, 06:31 PM
#2
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
god i wish i had waited.
Year 2002
Make Mitsubishi
Model Lancer
Trim O-Z Rally
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 115 mph
Limited Top Speed
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.6 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.6 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 6.3 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 9.0 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 11.7 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 16.0 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 21.0 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 28.6 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.8 s @ 81.7 mph
100 ft, Hard Launch 3.4 s
500 ft, Hard Launch 9.1 s
0-30 mph, Soft Launch 3.3 s
0-40 mph, Soft Launch 5.3 s
0-50 mph, Soft Launch 7.0 s
0-60 mph, Soft Launch 9.7 s
0-70 mph, Soft Launch 12.4 s
0-80 mph, Soft Launch 16.7 s
0-90 mph, Soft Launch 21.7 s
0-100 mph, Soft Launch 29.3 s
1/4 mile, Soft Launch 17.4 s @ 81.5 mph
100 ft, Soft Launch 3.8 s
500 ft, Soft Launch 9.6 s
Make Mitsubishi
Model Lancer
Trim O-Z Rally
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 115 mph
Limited Top Speed
0-30 mph, Hard Launch 2.6 s
0-40 mph, Hard Launch 4.6 s
0-50 mph, Hard Launch 6.3 s
0-60 mph, Hard Launch 9.0 s
0-70 mph, Hard Launch 11.7 s
0-80 mph, Hard Launch 16.0 s
0-90 mph, Hard Launch 21.0 s
0-100 mph, Hard Launch 28.6 s
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.8 s @ 81.7 mph
100 ft, Hard Launch 3.4 s
500 ft, Hard Launch 9.1 s
0-30 mph, Soft Launch 3.3 s
0-40 mph, Soft Launch 5.3 s
0-50 mph, Soft Launch 7.0 s
0-60 mph, Soft Launch 9.7 s
0-70 mph, Soft Launch 12.4 s
0-80 mph, Soft Launch 16.7 s
0-90 mph, Soft Launch 21.7 s
0-100 mph, Soft Launch 29.3 s
1/4 mile, Soft Launch 17.4 s @ 81.5 mph
100 ft, Soft Launch 3.8 s
500 ft, Soft Launch 9.6 s
Nov 30, 2002, 06:35 PM
#3
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lewisville, Tx
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not an issue of waiting, Nero, but of fund availability. Now, if I had 35K whenever I went in and bought my Lancer... well, I wouldn't have bought it. I'd more than likely be riding in an IS300 or S2000 or something.
You simply can't compare the economy car that has sporty looks and an old name with a SuperCar. It's like saying "God I wish I had waited for an NSX instead of buying my Accord."
You simply can't compare the economy car that has sporty looks and an old name with a SuperCar. It's like saying "God I wish I had waited for an NSX instead of buying my Accord."
Nov 30, 2002, 06:46 PM
#4
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually it was only the issue of waiting for me. i could have waited for the evo But as inpatient as i am i thought "LANCER"!!! wow i want one...so off i was. i should have waited, but i didnt.
and now im gonna pay the price. whenever i do see a new evo on the road im just gonna bow down, or moon em (depends if i am driving). because thats all that i can do.
and now im gonna pay the price. whenever i do see a new evo on the road im just gonna bow down, or moon em (depends if i am driving). because thats all that i can do.
Nov 30, 2002, 07:03 PM
#5
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: VA,USA
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
appreciate a car for it being there for you... not by its performance... what good is a super fast super handling car if it breaks cuz of the way u drive or by crashing it... i like my slo.z slow so i can just cruise around and look nice... 
Nov 30, 2002, 07:11 PM
#6
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i do agree point A to point B is big time... however why not have a car that will do that and do it fast while all the time looking tight?
Solution: The mitsu dealers trade us oz's for evo's even swap!
then i will quit *****ing.
until then
Solution: The mitsu dealers trade us oz's for evo's even swap!
then i will quit *****ing.
until then
Nov 30, 2002, 07:32 PM
#7
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Riiiiight. And that'll be the same day people trade in Justies for WRX's. In the words of comic book guy from the simpsons:
"Net profit to me, negative 10,000 dollars."
"As you are not familiar with sarcasm I will now close the register at this time."
"Net profit to me, negative 10,000 dollars."
"As you are not familiar with sarcasm I will now close the register at this time."
Trending Topics
Nov 30, 2002, 08:23 PM
#10
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ya as happy as i would be and as many back flips as i would do i know its not gonna happen...."But cha could imagine what it would be like!"
Nov 30, 2002, 08:23 PM
#11
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TB, FL
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: god i wish i had waited.
Originally posted by Nero
Year 2002
Make Mitsubishi
Model Lancer
Trim O-Z Rally
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 115 mph
Limited Top Speed
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.8 s @ 81.7 mph
Year 2002
Make Mitsubishi
Model Lancer
Trim O-Z Rally
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 115 mph
Limited Top Speed
1/4 mile, Hard Launch 16.8 s @ 81.7 mph
No way on stock tires will able to hold grip within the first 60 feet.
Nov 30, 2002, 08:29 PM
#13
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TB, FL
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sometimes, some sites post figures that seem too good to be true.
I have personally witnessed a modern 'stang v6 running a constant 17.4's while the modern 'maro V6 was running 17.1's in auto trim. They didn't have exhaust but may have intake. This was a drag event in bracket racing.
I have personally witnessed a modern 'stang v6 running a constant 17.4's while the modern 'maro V6 was running 17.1's in auto trim. They didn't have exhaust but may have intake. This was a drag event in bracket racing.
Nov 30, 2002, 09:00 PM
#14
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lewisville, Tx
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That seems really really really slow... I mean, call me crazy, but, that's about what I'd seen posted as far as 1/4 times go. But, Stangs and Camaro's going only that fast? Doesn't seem right.
