whos got the fastest NA lancer???
My mods are listed below the only difference is I had the test pipe on When i go back this weekend im gonna run without it and use the stock cat, I think it hurt me to wide open.
my car is an auto also...but with my mods and weight reductions i have done...i should be able to do low 16's but if i am lucky high 15's...what you guys think....i took out the 2 asorbers in da front bumper....which weighs near 15-20lbs each, cf trunk lid, cf hood, and did a battery relocation to the trunk where my launch is better cause of a lighter engine bay!
so what do u guys think i will be able to do...
so what do u guys think i will be able to do...
Engine mods:
-RRM SRI
-RRM Header
-RRM Piggyback ECU
-Ractive cat-back exhaust
I am automatic. I ran my friends G-Tech in my car and ran a 18.08 but he says it's about a second off, so maybe I ran a 17.08, but I need to take it to a track to find out.
My friend runs a 16.8 in his Civic, and I was keeping right next to him, about half a car back when we raced.
-RRM SRI
-RRM Header
-RRM Piggyback ECU
-Ractive cat-back exhaust
I am automatic. I ran my friends G-Tech in my car and ran a 18.08 but he says it's about a second off, so maybe I ran a 17.08, but I need to take it to a track to find out.
My friend runs a 16.8 in his Civic, and I was keeping right next to him, about half a car back when we raced.
Originally posted by MitsuLancer04
I ran a 15.1 with just RRM's CAI and catback exhaust. As soon as I have the ECU I should be in the 14's.
But I have a 2004 Mitsubishi RalliArt
I ran a 15.1 with just RRM's CAI and catback exhaust. As soon as I have the ECU I should be in the 14's.
But I have a 2004 Mitsubishi RalliArt
i ran my 16.3 with just CAI, header, and catback exhaust on stock tires (spare taken out of back)
and BTW 2002OZ, you shuold be faster without the testpipe..i was slower when i ran with the testpipe on
and BTW 2002OZ, you shuold be faster without the testpipe..i was slower when i ran with the testpipe on


