Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Question to Honda Boys...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #31  
dsmfan95's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Thats all hondas.
No, that's every 1.6L motor. Compare other 1.6L and 1.8L n/a motors and you'll see that Honda's have about the same amount of torque. It's just that the Honda motors make so much more HP than the other ones of the same criteria that it makes them seem inadequate.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #32  
evo4g63awd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Elgin
what about honda girls???? geeeze :-P jk. anyways a kinda fasination i have is how light those things are!!! pretty damn quick. buddy of mine has a civic with the b18c5 aka integra type r motor in it is faster than i am! pretty damn quick for a car that looks like a bean. i am impressed...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #33  
evo4g63awd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Elgin
Originally Posted by dsmfan95
No, that's every 1.6L motor. Compare other 1.6L and 1.8L n/a motors and you'll see that Honda's have about the same amount of torque. It's just that the Honda motors make so much more HP than the other ones of the same criteria that it makes them seem inadequate.

haha, you forgot about the d15!! 1.5L non vtec. yup, i had one, it sucked, dont get me wrong i loved my honda but i could run faster on foot! lol hondas dont have torque, what are you talking about?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #34  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Look at the S2000, it has what 130-140 ft/lb of torque? Before VTEC kicks in its slower than a civic. Of course once it gets to 7000 RPM its a whole new story.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:56 PM
  #35  
evo4g63awd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Elgin
good call....
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 03:29 AM
  #36  
dsmfan95's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by evo4g63awd
lol hondas dont have torque, what are you talking about?
Can you not read?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 06:54 AM
  #37  
Johns Slow ES's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Addison
well my buddy has a JDM integra type R and its got almost every upgrage i can think of except forced induction and that car is fast we ran at great lakes speed way and it ran mid 13s with crappy tires that were not hooking. IMO the looks good and handles great and it had a insane amount of torque (and its fun to drive it on the right side) but i would take a evo over that any day.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #38  
x838nwy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok
Why is the Integra type R so great? Well, I had one for a long time. [JDM DC5 Type R]

-They are beautiful to look at
-200bhp from a 2.0L engine ain't bad
-Revs. Till about 9000rpm stock
-Nice gearbox
-2600lbs (curb weight)
-Amazing handling
-Great brakes

All in all, a wonderful car. I got the evo while I had it, but sold it about a year after my evo arrived. The reason the evo has the edge is mainly because the ITR is very nearly at the limit of its capabilities. To get any more power from that engine without forced induction takes a lot of work for a relatively little gain and most of the time it's a trade-off. A full Spoon system from the engine to rear bumper, for example will get you hp, but at a very noticable expense of low end torque for example.

Anyway, while the ability to rev all the way into tomorrow is great fun, but it does get stressful driving long distances...

This isn't half of it but should get you going...
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 08:29 AM
  #39  
Kordwood's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Vestal, NY
There's also a historical context that you have to keep in mind. At the time, a car like this was considered ahead of its time so it retains a cult following. Even if its performance attributes pale in comparison to contempory cars. Look at the old Sentra SE-Rs and GTI's. They perform nowhere near cars like the STI, SRT-4 or EVO, yet there's alot of people out there who remember that these were once considered sporty cars so they still have a following.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #40  
coco's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Bay area, Ca
Originally Posted by BlingBling3314
Are you talking about a galant or a 3000gt?
Yes the Galant VR4


Originally Posted by dsmfan95
Based on opinion. The CTR lacks a lot of torque, but makes up for it with some extra HP on top end.

But dont people swap engines anyways? Yes the ITR and CTR are both not available in the US (right?) but why do people attempt to race integras when the honda is a better platform (becasue it is lighter) I am just making guesses.

I would rather have a fully modified civic, making it close to type r specs as opposed to an integra fully modified to type r specs.

Or am I missing something here like it is not possible to modify a lancer to an evo because, aside from the drivetrain, the body alone has a lot more welds???
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #41  
b204dr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
i had a gsr turbo hatch keep up with my evo.. but i over took him in 5th.. this is from a 30 mph roll
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #42  
RalliArtEvoVIII's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
From: SoCali!
ahh ok great amount of info here. thanks a bunch
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #43  
xjapx's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Boring, OR
CTR was never available in the US, only the watered down Si versions and the ITR was available from 97-01 as a limited edition coupe.

Originally Posted by coco
But dont people swap engines anyways? Yes the ITR and CTR are both not available in the US (right?)
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #44  
2GDSM's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
I think Kordwood hit the nail on the head. Nothing in its time could keep up for low cost on an Auto-X course. The turbo eclipses could win in a drag race, but they would get destroyed on a tight course. There were no SRT4's, Evo's, WRX's, STi's, SE-R Spec V's, Ralliarts, Mazda-Speeds etc. back in the 90's. If you wanted 200hp, it was either a type R, a turbo eclipse, or a turbo VW. Out of those three cars, the Type R was easily the best "race car". Another reason why they are so popular is because they are Honda's, which means they are still running reliably on the road whereas alot of the Eclipse's and Vdubs have gone by the wayside losing value.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 09:31 PM
  #45  
sayanara's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I love type-R's. They are great cars. The stuff bashing on VTEC, is just plain nonsense. I love my evo, but you have to love the simplicity, and robust nature of that car.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:09 PM.