What BMW could outrun a STi..
Only BMW can do it - M3 or M3CSL
BUT only when is dry...
No Z3M, M5...
I can post here results from track day
fastest ¨normal¨ car was Evo IX then bunch of STI, Turbos...
Fastest fas Caterham then MC12 and Carrera GT, GT3RS...
BUT only when is dry...
No Z3M, M5...
I can post here results from track day
fastest ¨normal¨ car was Evo IX then bunch of STI, Turbos...
Fastest fas Caterham then MC12 and Carrera GT, GT3RS...
sorry, uphill. AS STATED, it was a simple argument that came about so asking here to see what other car enthusiasts on these forums can bring to the table. Geez people..i guess comparisons are wrong nowadays. Only BMW i've driven is a 3series and a Z4, i've never driven an STi but when i had a 03 evo, the steering response and the way it would take corners (even on cheap tires) was superb compared to the BMWs.
Originally Posted by AzBlackEvo8
downhill or uphill?
And it's kind of hard to compare to STIs simply because those car came *fixed* up stock.
And it's kind of hard to compare to STIs simply because those car came *fixed* up stock.
yeah, but the M's are *fixed* up versions of the regular Z, 3, 5 and 6 series.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,002
Likes: 12
From: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
STi:
http://modernracer.com/subaruimprezawrxsti2006.html
0-60 mph : 4.7 sec. 0-¼ mile : 13.2 seconds @ 104.0 mph
BMWs:
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/BMW/2007/Z4_M_Coupe/
0-60 mph: 4.8 sec 0-¼ mile: ???
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/BMW/2006/M5/
0-60 mph: 4.1 0-¼ mile: 12.4 sec @ 116 mph
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/BMW/2006/M6/
0-60 mph: 4.1 0-¼ mile: 12.4 sec @ 118 mph
But dont forget your paying lots more for the BMW.
http://modernracer.com/subaruimprezawrxsti2006.html
0-60 mph : 4.7 sec. 0-¼ mile : 13.2 seconds @ 104.0 mph
BMWs:
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/BMW/2007/Z4_M_Coupe/
0-60 mph: 4.8 sec 0-¼ mile: ???
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/BMW/2006/M5/
0-60 mph: 4.1 0-¼ mile: 12.4 sec @ 116 mph
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/BMW/2006/M6/
0-60 mph: 4.1 0-¼ mile: 12.4 sec @ 118 mph
But dont forget your paying lots more for the BMW.
M5 too heavy just watch.. Pretty funny when he gets pissed off when 2 evo
passes by him. Start the video from 2min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OAw4...elated&search=
passes by him. Start the video from 2min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OAw4...elated&search=
Last edited by evo637; Nov 15, 2006 at 01:19 PM.
Originally Posted by evo637
M5 too heavy just watch.. Pretty funny when he gets pissed off when 2 evo
passes by him. Start the video from 2min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OAw4...elated&search=
passes by him. Start the video from 2min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OAw4...elated&search=
Originally Posted by nutrulz
How about the z8?
on the Top Gear Stig lap times, the alpina z8 and the STi WR1 were neck and neck:
45 BMW Alpina Z8 1.29.0
46 Subaru Impreza STi WRX WR1 1.29.4
Full list:
http://www.topgear.com/content/tgonb...times/thestig/
edit: for reference, the standard stock Evo VIII was a hair faster at 1.28.9
Originally Posted by RalliArtEvoVIII
oh sorry, this includes against evos as well, but mostly applies to the sti. Note: this is with MOSTLY twists and curves, hardddd turns (almost hair pins), through gravel (stock vs stock with similar drivers). Very Very few straights
BMWs weight a **** load and the evo/stis can pull away through the turns and stuff due to their tight, low end gearing. as long as the evo/sti stays in their boost range (and doesnt drop below) i think the bmws cant win
Originally Posted by nutrulz
One more 2002 M3 GTR.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q8ZNkhxT04




