Wtf?
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Defiance
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wtf?
I was just reading one of the new car mags with a comparo between the x and the 128I. They should be pretty evenly matched with the 128I "supposedly" having 300hp and the evo 291. You would think the evo would at least be faster to 30 and maybe to 60 before the bmw passes it, but not so. The beamer is faster from a dead stop all the way to top end. I thought the awd cars were always faster than the rwd from a dig. Either the bmw is way underrated, the evo is overrated or it has something to do with the transmission, gearing or weight. I understand the evo is a couple hundred pounds heavier too. I guess a twin-turbo 6 should be faster than a single-turbo four...
In the evo's favor, it was faster around a road course and kept widening the distance the farther they went.
In the evo's favor, it was faster around a road course and kept widening the distance the farther they went.
#3
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what is the complaint here? Both cars performed as expected. The Evo X is more true to its form, its track car. Evo engineers don't give a damn about 1/4 mile times. Lap times is all that matters to them. The beamer, you said it yourself, six cylinder twin turbo. Since when do you see a slow six cylinder twin turbo. That beamer was also mated to a regular automatic transmission.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ryans1000
Evo General
32
Feb 22, 2011 10:12 PM
rallyred1234
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
16
Apr 13, 2008 10:24 PM
fromWRXtoEVO
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
170
Dec 21, 2007 03:05 PM