Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

2010 GT-R Record setting 7:27:56

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #1  
lexat20's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 1
From: thrillville, IL
2010 GT-R Record setting 7:27:56

I want one
http://www.thetorquereport.com/2009/...ecor.html#more
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
^^^ It doesn't get better than that....

Carlos
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 07:34 PM
  #3  
Zodiac13's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
5 more horsepower, about 132 pounds less and almost double the price.

great car but i will be fine with a standard spec and just fix it up more than 5 hp

GT-R V Spec
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #4  
evosam726's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 658
Likes: 1
From: IL
nice!!!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #5  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by Zodiac13
5 more horsepower, about 132 pounds less and almost double the price.

great car but i will be fine with a standard spec and just fix it up more than 5 hp

GT-R V Spec
I thought the car tested was the regular GTR with a couple of upgrades not the Spec V.

Carlos
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #6  
DizeLLx's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: ny
very nice
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 09:44 PM
  #7  
Brian's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Internets
Originally Posted by fromWRXtoEVO
I thought the car tested was the regular GTR with a couple of upgrades not the Spec V.

Carlos
That's how I read it as well.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 09:54 PM
  #8  
ChopShop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Fort Hood
that is just awsome
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 09:59 PM
  #9  
Zodiac13's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
ahh i miss read the original articale. the one you posted was standar with v-spec wheels and tires not a full v-spec.

im more impressed now lol but hope they do something more with the actual v-spec. from what i hear though its only planned on coming out in japan. i also hear they are thinking of a m-spec???
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 10:13 PM
  #10  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by Brian_H
That's how I read it as well.
No kidding!! plus if you actually go to the youtube comment section people also believe it was the Spec V. It only takes one to fool the crowd if you know what I mean. .


Carlos

Last edited by fromWRXtoEVO; Apr 16, 2009 at 10:43 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 12:00 AM
  #11  
South Side Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Pretty awesome that Nissan backed up the earlier 7:29 (which Porsche claimed wasn't possible) times with an even faster times. It's really cool that it was in a standard 2010 GTR, with only wheels and tires from the V-spec as an upgrade.

From the sound of it, the times were impaired by dust and sand on the track. Which means it may be possible to get into the 7:26's. Within striking range of the ZR1.

Last edited by South Side Evo; Apr 17, 2009 at 12:04 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:44 AM
  #12  
E. Haskell's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by South Side Evo
Pretty awesome that Nissan backed up the earlier 7:29 (which Porsche claimed wasn't possible) times with an even faster times. It's really cool that it was in a standard 2010 GTR, with only wheels and tires from the V-spec as an upgrade.
I don't know why, but when Automobile tested the GT2 and GTR at Nurburgring, the GT2 was 7 seconds faster (7:49 vs 7:56). Maybe Porsche is correct?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 02:17 AM
  #13  
E. Haskell's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: NC
As far as the ZR1 vs '10 GTR....I think you'd need a v-spec for i to be close.

When Motor Trend tested the GTR, ZR1, GT2 and 599 GTB on a very short/tight track, their lap times went like this:

ZR1 - 56.9
GT2 - 57.5
599 - 58.0
GTR - 58.1

If the ZR1 is creating a significant lead like that on a short curvy track, I just don't see where the GTR could hang close at the 'Ring. In the straights the GTR would get murdered considering the ZR1 traps about 130 mph.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 03:15 AM
  #14  
MR. EVO MR's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: :noitacoL
what happened to tomorrow?
or is that today?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 06:37 AM
  #15  
cij911's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 1
From: Socal :)
The GTR is nice, but I like the 911TT more ....
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:14 AM.