Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

In reference to the Evo's "Heavy weight"...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2008, 08:45 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
fastkevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In reference to the Evo's "Heavy weight"...

I keep reading competition related threads ,and one thing always stands out. The Evo is heavy, and has a disadvantage with it's competition. I'm new to the Evo, and I have a coupla questions:
What's it's competition, and what does it weigh?
The BMW 3's are heavier stock (so is a 911 nowadays), and I always see them doing quite well, in door to door racing anyway. How do they do well against their competition at their weight, but not the Evo? Heck, why isn't the 3 series the Evo's competition?
Why doesn't the Evo's handling and power overcome it?
Old Jan 7, 2008, 09:05 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What is the Evo's competition in what? You have to provide a venue for us to answer that question. 3 series BMWs (primarily E36 M3s) are big competition for us in several SCCA Solo II classes, but that's low speed, tight-turn racing. We don't typically compete with them in track venues.

STIs are pretty much our main competition everywhere, and they weigh about the same, same drivetrain type, and similar power, so no real advantage there.

Vettes/Z06s also, but there we have neither a weight NOR power advantage in most cases.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 09:15 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
UT_Evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOST references (at least I hope) are in reference to the stock weight on the track... Just in general and not to any competition... At least, that's when I reference the doggish weight of the Evo.

Compared to a ~2500lb S2k the Evo is heavy, since that's the other car I drove on track, I guess that would be its "competition"?

I'm with Warr, this thread makes no sense. The Evo is heavy, yes, but even I had no problem keeping up with much lighter cars on track (Lotus Exige, i.e.) w/ just TBE, tune, JIC coilovers, and R compounds.

I have, however, ridden in a fairly lightweight Evo that was otherwise stock (besides being entirely gutted, and having the boost LOWERED to 17psi) that thing hauled ***...

If you're talking about racing events then usually there are rulings that prevent certain things or allow certain things (of course...) so our "competition" in that class would idealy be every single car in the class, and yes, generally the Evo's power and handling overcomes the weight. BTW standard '08 997 curb weight is 3,075 lbs... Standard Evo IX curb weight is around 3200-3300 lbs... Curb Weight: 3,263 lbs (EV0) 3,219 lbs (EVO RS) 3,285 lbs (EVO MR)... Not too different, but the Porsche certainly isn't heavier stock. But that definitely doesn't matter either, take it from a Porsche fanboy, regular Carreras up to C4Ses don't stand a chance on the track against an Evo. I beat (passed) plenty of 911 TTs and GT3s with the same mods I had listed above, I'm sure Warrtalon has as well, the Evo is a beast on the track.

Last edited by UT_Evo; Jan 7, 2008 at 09:20 AM.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 09:19 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
And as an aside, but very applicable, there is MUCH to gain in all aspects of performance when we shave off a few hundred pounds. Acceleration, cornering, braking, less wear-and-tear, but I know this is all pretty obvious to most. I have been racing with my Evo being well-modified but nearly full weight with no actual weight reduction, but I think it's time to let go of the "daily driver" mantra. Yes, I will still daily drive it, but I think I'm more interested in shaving as much weight as possible without making the car too annoying. I was 250lbs heavier than Daddio at Nats, and he had another 40whp or so. Add that to his superior setup knowledge and superior driving = pain. At the very least, I can reduce the weight and power differences...
Old Jan 7, 2008, 10:13 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
boomn29's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Agree with everything stated thus far.

Overall weight just increases wear and tear especially on tires/brakes and that means more $$ to run at the track (road/race, NASA, TT, etc).

It's definitely not a comparison, but look at how much Miata's or Honda Challenge cars weigh!
Old Jan 7, 2008, 10:19 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
UT_Evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, and from boomn29's example, compare average modded Evo avg speeds through corners to Spec Miatas or Honda Challenge cars. Most often it will be less (the Evo avg speed), I got out cornered by plenty of Spec Miatas, then right out of the corners I'd go past em.

Or hell, go for a ride/drive in a Lotus Elise/Exige or other light weight car. You can FEEL the difference.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 10:33 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
DJ Brett B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: salt lake city
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know this is but I want to see an Exige with a built 4g63 motor swapped into it... I saw somewhere online that somebody stuffed a K-series Honda motor (N/A) into an Elise and that thing hauled ***!!!
Old Jan 7, 2008, 01:42 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Bueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
What is the Evo's competition in what?
Roughly what i was going to say. OP, your question is relative. What competition series are you referring to? Without knowing what youre referring to specifically, we cant help answer your question. If youre making reference to threads where people discuss your basic HPDE, then thats a different story. You noted in your other threads that you have years of racing experience and what not, so it wont be necessary to get into details. So rather simply speaking, at your basic HPDE youre not competing against other people. Drivers/cars are not divided into specific classes. Therefore, its not logical to be comparing yourself to the Porsche that you just ran down, or the S2000 that passed you, or the Vette that you kept up with. An HPDE is nothing more than what it stands for, a high performance driving event. At these events youre going to see cars that are built for specific classes, youre going to see your typical track rat, and youre going to see your typical noob.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 06:41 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Galant VR-4 #34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 563
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
In scca T2 class where the cars are very close to stock the Evo is superior to the M3 with both cars on stock suspension but aftermarket shocks. The scca saw fit to give the M3 aftermarket springs and swaybars to keep them competitive whereas the evo is on stock springs and sways.
Marty
Old Jan 7, 2008, 07:31 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
fastkevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Galant VR-4 #34
In scca T2 class where the cars are very close to stock the Evo is superior to the M3 with both cars on stock suspension but aftermarket shocks. The scca saw fit to give the M3 aftermarket springs and swaybars to keep them competitive whereas the evo is on stock springs and sways.
Marty
Yeah IIRC most of the posts I've read were in reference to SCCA classes, but the wording I remember gave me the impression that the Evo's (over) weight was common knowledge. So the M3 actually get's an advantage over the Evo..? Never would have thunk it.
Old Jan 8, 2008, 12:48 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Fastkevin, there's a BIG difference between road racing, time trials, and autocross. Marty is talking about T2, which is wheel-to-wheel road racing in near-stock cars. Very few people compete at that level and only a handful of Evos overall. I think most of what you've been reading is related to autocross, which is much different in terms of competition.
Old Jan 9, 2008, 02:10 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
fastkevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Fastkevin, there's a BIG difference between road racing, time trials, and autocross. Marty is talking about T2, which is wheel-to-wheel road racing in near-stock cars. Very few people compete at that level and only a handful of Evos overall. I think most of what you've been reading is related to autocross, which is much different in terms of competition.
I was looking for exactly what Marty gave. He competes in "X" class, "Y" cars are his competiton, and the "Y"'s get a performance equalizer, meaning the Evo's weight doesn't come in to play in his class.

Last edited by fastkevin; Jan 9, 2008 at 02:17 AM.
Old Jan 9, 2008, 04:56 AM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Matt2.8NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fastkevin
I was looking for exactly what Marty gave. He competes in "X" class, "Y" cars are his competiton, and the "Y"'s get a performance equalizer, meaning the Evo's weight doesn't come in to play in his class.

Mmmm, I might not say that. Much of the SCCA is politics based, so you still can't be sure what the real "truth" is about a particular vehicle's speed.

For reference, see the Solstice win this year at the runoffs and it's performance "equalizers".
Old Jan 9, 2008, 06:43 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
GTLocke13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Yorklyn, DE
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Matt2.8NJ
Mmmm, I might not say that. Much of the SCCA is politics based, so you still can't be sure what the real "truth" is about a particular vehicle's speed.

For reference, see the Solstice win this year at the runoffs and it's performance "equalizers".
Hey, they've apologized to Mazda. Let's not re-open old wounds.

SCCA politics can be pretty brutal. I'm reminded of a certain thread on sccaforums that went 27 pages about getting a certain car kicked out of BSP because the corvette couldn't win anymore...
Old Jan 9, 2008, 07:07 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fastkevin
I was looking for exactly what Marty gave. He competes in "X" class, "Y" cars are his competiton, and the "Y"'s get a performance equalizer, meaning the Evo's weight doesn't come in to play in his class.
Um, ok, but weight is a big factor in most other venues.


Quick Reply: In reference to the Evo's "Heavy weight"...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:42 AM.