Philadelphia's Classiest Drunkards
there is a good map converter about two posts down in the V7 thread. copy your old scalings and values into the spreadsheet and it will spit out your new BIG MAP values.
One thing I did change though was the RPM scaling. OEM I think went something like 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750, 2000, basically every 250 RPM. The new maps go something like 500,1000,1500,2000. So I took away a few values from the 8000RPM range and inserted them into the lower RPM range to give me more resolution.
I dunno whether thats right or wrong, but I figured if the factory felt it was necessary to have the lower RPM broken out into 250 increments I should too.
One thing I did change though was the RPM scaling. OEM I think went something like 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750, 2000, basically every 250 RPM. The new maps go something like 500,1000,1500,2000. So I took away a few values from the 8000RPM range and inserted them into the lower RPM range to give me more resolution.
I dunno whether thats right or wrong, but I figured if the factory felt it was necessary to have the lower RPM broken out into 250 increments I should too.
no, thats not how they did it. RPM and load are on two different axis. It looks like they (Tephra and whomever else did the work) added additional rows/columns, but they focused the scaling more on the range from 3k RPM and up. I wasn't going to rev my stock motor to 8500+ RPM, so I just removed some of those values and used the space for the lower RPM.
good morning everyone.
marc, happy valentine's day, baby!
SMH: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ed-clutch.html
marc, happy valentine's day, baby!
SMH: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ed-clutch.html
no, thats not how they did it. RPM and load are on two different axis. It looks like they (Tephra and whomever else did the work) added additional rows/columns, but they focused the scaling more on the range from 3k RPM and up. I wasn't going to rev my stock motor to 8500+ RPM, so I just removed some of those values and used the space for the lower RPM.


