Originally Posted by AWCAWD

I do not wish to make a premature conclusion but here is how I see it. Mitsubishi replaced (and/or) reprogrammed the transmission for this:
"Meanwhile, 2.0-litre petrol ASX models with CVT automatic transmission benefit from performance upgrades that include a more responsive acceleration feel from a standing start and at mid-range speeds,...)
http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mell...257CDD00167D80
"Key change on the upgrade list involves the fitment of a next-generation CVT (continuously variable automatic transmission) which Mitsu says is equivalent to a 7-speed automatic."
http://www.kbb.com/car-news/all-the-...pg/2000010800/

The down side is that it is probably no longer a true CVT (must somehow suggest that is "shifting" and not droning to please people that is the feel part). Nissans are known to have CVTs that appear to be shifting (I drove a Rogue).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG33m1WCLEY
It would be interesting to hear from people like CottageLifer, who has both RVR and Pathfinder and FROM BMX RACR, who drove side by side a 13 and a 15 model year OSs.
The above would explain why Nissan has much more problems with their tuned JATCO CVTs. That could also mean that shifting (may even be paddle shifting) is adversely effecting longevity.
This last paragraph here is pure speculation based on some facts though.