Notices
Project Cars / Build Threads Please post your build threads here.

CT9A Resurrection and Innovation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2015, 09:42 AM
  #166  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by tscompusa
...

The transmission OEM internals should be ok, but you are going to stress test everything more then anyone ever did with all that low end torque the electric build is going to make.

...
I've always wondered whether torque at low rpm is any more damaging than torque at higher rpm for the driveline. Torque itself is an rpm-independent value, so in concept, as long as the power is applied smoothly, the transmission, TC, and diff shouldn't care whether the motor is at 0 rpm or 4000 rpm. I suppose there could be an effect of dwell time that any pair of gear teeth need to support the load. At lower gear rpms, the dwell time is higher, so each pair of teeth need to support load for a longer period of time. At zero rpm, I guess this could be a problem.
Old Nov 8, 2015, 02:43 PM
  #167  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
deeman101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,142
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
I've always wondered whether torque at low rpm is any more damaging than torque at higher rpm for the driveline. Torque itself is an rpm-independent value, so in concept, as long as the power is applied smoothly, the transmission, TC, and diff shouldn't care whether the motor is at 0 rpm or 4000 rpm. I suppose there could be an effect of dwell time that any pair of gear teeth need to support the load. At lower gear rpms, the dwell time is higher, so each pair of teeth need to support load for a longer period of time. At zero rpm, I guess this could be a problem.

Its been a while since I did this type of physics, but I think you have to keep in mind the "jerk" as well. Rate of change in acceleration, which I think will be greater in the electric motor. I'm not a mechy but I think the stress of this will be greater than seen with ICE motors.
Old Nov 9, 2015, 09:44 AM
  #168  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
06MREvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 4,800
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Nice updates sir! Can't wait to swing by & check this out at some point!
Old Nov 10, 2015, 04:36 AM
  #169  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by deeman101
Its been a while since I did this type of physics, but I think you have to keep in mind the "jerk" as well. Rate of change in acceleration, which I think will be greater in the electric motor. I'm not a mechy but I think the stress of this will be greater than seen with ICE motors.
This is what I was concerned about. If things start to move slow before he gets on it though he should be ok.

Something tells me, he can control the speed the motor initiates so he should be ok.
Old Nov 10, 2015, 04:38 AM
  #170  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
I've always wondered whether torque at low rpm is any more damaging than torque at higher rpm for the driveline. Torque itself is an rpm-independent value, so in concept, as long as the power is applied smoothly, the transmission, TC, and diff shouldn't care whether the motor is at 0 rpm or 4000 rpm. I suppose there could be an effect of dwell time that any pair of gear teeth need to support the load. At lower gear rpms, the dwell time is higher, so each pair of teeth need to support load for a longer period of time. At zero rpm, I guess this could be a problem.

If its a soft start I think it will be ok the more I think about it.
Old Nov 10, 2015, 05:29 AM
  #171  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Malvern, PA
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
450wtq @ 0 rpm.. first pull.. BOOM..

This a sick build though! Hope everything works out with it and want to see video's of it running!
Old Nov 10, 2015, 07:38 AM
  #172  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by tscompusa
If its a soft start I think it will be ok the more I think about it.
Originally Posted by 5LEEPERISAH23I
450wtq @ 0 rpm.. first pull.. BOOM..
The more I think about it, the less of an issue I see for this torque level compared to an ICE Evo. The torque is rated at the motor, so it will probably be something 400 ft-lbs on a chassis dyno. I think the fear of full torque at zero rpm is not an issue in itself. The notion being conjured is that motor has infinite twisting power because its at 0 rpm, but that's not the case. Its only 450 ft-lbs at the motor. A solid launch in an ICE Evo is going to make near-instant full use of the available torque the motor can make. The driveline has no idea that the motor is spinning at 6000 rpm when it feels the torque. I still think it will be very important to preload and avoid wheelhop just as with an ICE. And throttle control will be needed to modulate wheelspin.
Old Nov 10, 2015, 10:34 AM
  #173  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
electron bom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 375
Received 61 Likes on 40 Posts
Getting closer...

Waiting on some more hardware before I can mate the motor to the gearbox, but here is a shot of the flywheel and adapter pieces fitted.


Old Nov 10, 2015, 10:44 AM
  #174  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Very freaking cool.
Old Nov 11, 2015, 08:06 PM
  #175  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
wingless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,221
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Appreciate the awesome build, thanks for sharing!
Old Nov 12, 2015, 06:41 AM
  #176  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
bakuro117's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cynthiana, KY
Posts: 1,849
Received 36 Likes on 36 Posts
Awesome!!
Old Nov 13, 2015, 03:23 PM
  #177  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
electron bom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 375
Received 61 Likes on 40 Posts
Replacing a front wheel bearing and painting the caliper.

Old Nov 13, 2015, 04:38 PM
  #178  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
AutoXMRIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near a Beach one of these days
Posts: 154
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by electron bom
fresh!


I wire brushed and PB Blasted the splined axle fittings and then covered them in Lithium compound grease. A local shop pressed in the new bearings!



Where did you get the bearing from and what is the p/n?
Old Nov 13, 2015, 04:46 PM
  #179  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
AutoXMRIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near a Beach one of these days
Posts: 154
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by electron bom
Wrap?

I'm leaning toward wrapping the car in vinyl. 3M 1080 gloss anthracite seems to be close enough to Graphite Gray so that the door jambs won't clash. Doing a vinyl wrap job myself will cost about $4k less than paint and I'd much rather spend the savings on performance. Thoughts?


I believe this space ship is wrapped in 3M gloss anthracite

Plasti dip that son of a gun...
Old Nov 15, 2015, 07:22 PM
  #180  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 335
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by electron bom
getting closer...

waiting on some more hardware before i can mate the motor to the gearbox, but here is a shot of the flywheel and adapter pieces fitted.


4g63e?


Quick Reply: CT9A Resurrection and Innovation



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:03 AM.