Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo 8 - Stock Block - BW SX200 - GSC S3 - E70

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2017 | 01:49 PM
  #1  
tscompusa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Evo 8 - Stock Block - BW SX200 - GSC S3 - E70

First time ever tuning a SX200, so figured it may be of benefit to share.
This turbos supposed to be inbetween a Red & Black to put its size into
perspective. Borg warner rates it at 580hp, and it seems like their ratings
are pretty spot on for the most part.

Mods on this car are:

Stock block
Borg warner SX200
GSC S3 cams
TSComptuned Double pumper
FIC 2150cc inj
3" TBE
Grimmspeed 3port
2.5" upper piping /w Tial Q BOV
Tephra v7 Speed density /w ecuboost

As seen from below the turbo is pretty responsive. I had to do a lot to keep the torque down so you see a very interesting boost curve.




Last edited by tscompusa; Sep 29, 2017 at 02:09 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2017 | 02:19 PM
  #2  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
Single scroll turbine housing?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2017 | 03:18 PM
  #3  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
seems like a crap ton of boost for mid 500's
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 01:44 AM
  #4  
extreme-eg's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 79
Likes: 17
From: South Africa
Originally Posted by razorlab
seems like a crap ton of boost for mid 500's
Its a ~56mm inducer turbo so I don't think its too bad factoring that in. You need to compare this to a GT(X)30 for reference. Considering that 62mm turbos are also making mid 500's at 28 - 30 psi on stock blocks.

@Tom, would you know if this is the newer SX-E 10-blade billet version (S257 SX-E) or the older normal "S200" ?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 04:52 AM
  #5  
mines5's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 868
Likes: 23
From: Streets of willow
How is the transient response on these ?

A.C compressor bracket still in place ?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 06:33 AM
  #6  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by extreme-eg
Its a ~56mm inducer turbo so I don't think its too bad factoring that in. You need to compare this to a GT(X)30 for reference. Considering that 62mm turbos are also making mid 500's at 28 - 30 psi on stock
it’s 35-36 psi for peak hp, not 28-30

Last edited by razorlab; Oct 2, 2017 at 07:09 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 12:41 PM
  #7  
tscompusa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by extreme-eg
Its a ~56mm inducer turbo so I don't think its too bad factoring that in. You need to compare this to a GT(X)30 for reference. Considering that 62mm turbos are also making mid 500's at 28 - 30 psi on stock blocks.

@Tom, would you know if this is the newer SX-E 10-blade billet version (S257 SX-E) or the older normal "S200" ?
Its an S257 SX-E from what I was told.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2017 | 08:32 PM
  #8  
Strm Trpr's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 9
From: NorCal
What size hotside?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2017 | 12:19 AM
  #9  
tscompusa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by Strm Trpr
What size hotside?
I am not sure. This is about the max the turbo is capable of HP wise though on this vehicle.
Should be about a 133-134 trap.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2017 | 01:36 AM
  #10  
extreme-eg's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 79
Likes: 17
From: South Africa
Originally Posted by razorlab
it’s 35-36 psi for peak hp, not 28-30
Yes I was referencing what psi the larger 62mm turbos run to make similar numbers as a comparison.

What I will add is that BW rates that S257 SX-E at 65 lb/min but it doesn't appear like there is much room for more power on this setup. The S200 exhaust wheel is probably reaching its peak flow capability before the compressor wheel.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2017 | 07:45 AM
  #11  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by extreme-eg
Yes I was referencing what psi the larger 62mm turbos run to make similar numbers as a comparison.
My personal Evo makes 530whp with only 25psi with a 5858, and 560whp with 27psi but it's an evo 10 so not a direct comparison, but now you know why I made the statement I made.

BTW, my comments are not about Tom's capabilities, I am just discussing the turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2017 | 12:57 AM
  #12  
extreme-eg's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 79
Likes: 17
From: South Africa
Originally Posted by razorlab
My personal Evo makes 530whp with only 25psi with a 5858, and 560whp with 27psi but it's an evo 10 so not a direct comparison, but now you know why I made the statement I made.

BTW, my comments are not about Tom's capabilities, I am just discussing the turbo.
All good, always good to debate points when discussing technical topics and get different frame of references. Good numbers on your 5858 setup.

Seems like BW is starting to follow the Garrett GTX marketing mould of pairing very high flowing compressor wheels with great advertised flow rates to existing turbine wheel configurations that reach their choke limit before the compressor wheel does.

I have a sense that the S369 SX-E will be a similar case
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2017 | 04:03 AM
  #13  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
Originally Posted by extreme-eg
All good, always good to debate points when discussing technical topics and get different frame of references. Good numbers on your 5858 setup.

Seems like BW is starting to follow the Garrett GTX marketing mould of pairing very high flowing compressor wheels with great advertised flow rates to existing turbine wheel configurations that reach their choke limit before the compressor wheel does.

I have a sense that the S369 SX-E will be a similar case
The S200SXE has the same turbine blade profile as the EFR 7670 and the compressor is rated at 65-68lb/min. I'm betting this result is a standard S200SX in a smallish T3 turbine housing. Also looks like a small intake, which never helps. Plenty of variables to consider before one assumes.

Also, more efficient compressor wheels actually reduce the work required from the turbine, so any way you slice it it's a win. Garrett has done some goofy things, don't get me wrong, but they have a few gems in the lineup.

Last edited by RWD4G63; Oct 4, 2017 at 04:09 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2017 | 04:30 AM
  #14  
2winscroll's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 816
Likes: 82
From: wisconsin
Originally Posted by RWD4G63
The S200SXE has the same turbine blade profile as the EFR 7670.
Absolutely false information. EFR wheels have totally different blade angles and don't flow as well as the SX-E turbines. EFR wheels are cupped more for better response.

Nice results! would be nice to know the hotside configuration.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2017 | 04:34 AM
  #15  
Strm Trpr's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 9
From: NorCal
Can we get a definite answer on whether or not this is a S257SXE, and what size turbine housing?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:57 PM.