Notices

Here I Come TurboTrix!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 10:11 PM
  #31  
spyderx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore/ DC
I do have lower ic from my Injen full intake kit.

I thought 3" Magnaflow cats were decent, guess not.

Catless is not an option for me! The guy that I saw there had a catco cat and still got 325whp.

The thing that bugs me is that the day before TT tune I had local Midas weld the Magnaflow into my midpipe. Spent $400 on this custom job with material and labor!

Maybe new cats improve over time....
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 05:46 AM
  #32  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
_Then I am as confused as you....Phantom Boost Leak?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 05:47 AM
  #33  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
THE MAIN REASON IS, was that you were getting detonation up top, meaning you were have a restriction not allowing the hot exhaust gasses out, idm man.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #34  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by spyderx
I do have lower ic from my Injen full intake kit.

I thought 3" Magnaflow cats were decent, guess not.

Catless is not an option for me! The guy that I saw there had a catco cat and still got 325whp.

The thing that bugs me is that the day before TT tune I had local Midas weld the Magnaflow into my midpipe. Spent $400 on this custom job with material and labor!

Maybe new cats improve over time....
There is NOTHING wrong with the magnaflow cat.
That is all I will say about that because alot of BS is being thrown out here.
I don't know how your 3" cat is going to affect your tune that much. Your tune seems a little sketchy to me.

Last edited by Precision Dyno; Aug 2, 2005 at 04:43 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #35  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by umiami80
THE MAIN REASON IS, was that you were getting detonation up top, meaning you were have a restriction not allowing the hot exhaust gasses out, idm man.
The biggest restriction in that car is the turbo. NOT the CAT.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #36  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Biggest restriction is the turbo? You mean the stock turbo? I make 350 WHP on the same mods as him plus a pully and no cat, explain.

I still say the cat, then the lower Ic piping then the stock exhaust and so on..
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 03:47 AM
  #37  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
The biggest restriction in that car is the turbo. NOT the CAT.
This is total crap. I have seen, and many others as well, 20-30 ft lb/HP gains simply by removing the cat (and tuning for it). And then I have seen big aftermarket turbos make 10 more HP than the stocker. Then you see Curt Brown about to run 10's with the stock turbo. I bet he doesn't have a cat. Go back to tuning Civics and installing wooden bodykits.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 04:29 AM
  #38  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by umiami80
Biggest restriction is the turbo? You mean the stock turbo? I make 350 WHP on the same mods as him plus a pully and no cat, explain.

I still say the cat, then the lower Ic piping then the stock exhaust and so on..
He stated he doesn't have one ounce of stock exhaust left on his car.
And Yes I mean the stock turbo.

You stated earlier and I quote "" THE MAIN REASON IS, was that you were getting detonation up top, meaning you were have a restriction not allowing the hot exhaust gasses out, idm man.""


Have you ever measured pressure in the exhaust manifold before, or in any part of the exhaust system??
A turbocharger is your first and main restriction in that exhaust system above a certain RPM.
Now that is not to say that the ENGINE can not produce more power than claimed after his tune. I am just clearing up something.
Secondly if your car with the same mods was making more power before, specifically 50 more HP, you are contributing this to the aftermarket Magnaflow cat? Come on... Read thu the BS
You guys are tuning your cars on what kind of dyno?
Are you both running the same engine management?
Just flashes?
I would like to know if you are truely in the same mod class.

Last edited by Precision Dyno; Aug 2, 2005 at 04:46 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 04:35 AM
  #39  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
This is total crap. I have seen, and many others as well, 20-30 ft lb/HP gains simply by removing the cat (and tuning for it). And then I have seen big aftermarket turbos make 10 more HP than the stocker. Then you see Curt Brown about to run 10's with the stock turbo. I bet he doesn't have a cat. Go back to tuning Civics and installing wooden bodykits.
The stock cat I would tend to agree.
Obviously you read with your eyes and not your mind.
I stated that the biggest restriction on THAT vehicles' exhaust system was the turbo. MEANING that in my opinion the system if fine and capable of making more power.
NOT that he must change the turbo. I think you need to reread my post.
The evo simply with cams, intercooler & piping, with exaust make tremendous power, when tuned right. I actually agree with your statement.
Except the part of the wooden body kits. We have upgraded to reinforced cardboard now.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 05:51 AM
  #40  
TurbotrixRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
From: Edison
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
The biggest restriction in that car is the turbo. NOT the CAT.

Really , you can get 400 whp out of the stock turbo and its a restriction? Since your on post number 8, i'll take your comments with a grain of salt. The cat is most def the biggest restriction on the car. Although i've been on your site. ..very impressive ..


Mark
Turbotrix..
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 05:52 AM
  #41  
TurbotrixRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
From: Edison
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
The stock cat I would tend to agree.
Obviously you read with your eyes and not your mind.
I stated that the biggest restriction on THAT vehicles' exhaust system was the turbo. MEANING that in my opinion the system if fine and capable of making more power.
NOT that he must change the turbo. I think you need to reread my post.
The evo simply with cams, intercooler & piping, with exaust make tremendous power, when tuned right. I actually agree with your statement.
Except the part of the wooden body kits. We have upgraded to reinforced cardboard now.

Are you suggesting i cant tune ?

Mark
Turbotrix

Last edited by TurbotrixRacing; Apr 11, 2005 at 06:15 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 06:35 AM
  #42  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
Really , you can get 400 whp out of the stock turbo and its a restriction? Since your on post number 8, i'll take your comments with a grain of salt. The cat is most def the biggest restriction on the car. Although i've been on your site. ..very impressive ..


Mark
Turbotrix..
Ah another hooked on phonics reader..
Read my previous posts about HIS system. Meaning that his exhaust is FINE. Your just making excuses because you couldn't match the power figure made by another car.
Also if you can read, oopps I'm sorry, if you can put some ideas together to form a thought then you may have read that the site is under construction.

Last edited by Precision Dyno; Aug 2, 2005 at 04:49 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 06:36 AM
  #43  
Precision Dyno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TurbotrixRacing
Are you suggesting i cant tune ?

Mark
Turbotrix
Are you feeling a little insecure this morning?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 06:48 AM
  #44  
DCSilvrEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 1
From: Hyattsville MD
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
Are you feeling a little insecure this morning?
I just want to know how in the HELL is the TURBO the biggest Restriction? That doesnt even sound right? Are you saying the turbo is bad?!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 06:56 AM
  #45  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by spyderx
guys,

I appreaciated all your inputs and I'll post my result from TT today. Here are my mods todate including today's at TT:

- custom flash at TT
- injen intake w/ lower ic pipe
- hallman mbc at 21lbs
- full turbo-back w/ rigged mid pipe w/ magnaflow 3" hi-flow cat and 3" core resonator, replaced of 2.5" flange w/ 3" flange
- HKS ssq bov
- HKS 272/272
-walbrow 255

My best pull on Dynotech was 299whp and 299tq. To tell the truth, I was expecting 10% more but still noticable improvement. Mark sweated out some two hours on the dyno and I certainly appreciated his work. He pointed the shortfall to the cat. But I noticed great improvement after the 3" cat over the stock cat prior to TT. My car now pull beyond 4K w/ linear pwr delivery.

I decided to not use a testpipe for it's disadvantage. So I'm thinking maybe the resonator I just welded yesterday is overly restrictive?

Funny thing was I met up w/ another local 03' evo fellow owner while at TT and he had similar setup w/ the exception of cam gears. And he dynoed 325whp peak?
I don't get it. Anyone have insight to this?

See below for dyno result.
I don't know what kind of dyno the Dynotech is, but I got 257 whp on a DD dyno which is equivalent to 290 whp on an inertial dyno (Dynojet) with only an XEDE and a cat back..... That's stock cat, dp and everything else.......
I had a similar experience to yours in the past. My previous '03 GSR was "tuned" by Busted Solutions with similarly laughable results (if you can still laugh after spending multil $Ks on crap and crappy tuning). After much messing around and suffering from countless driveability issues, I finally got the car to make right at 298 whp on the DD dyno (333 whp on Dynojet) at 19 psi.
What I finally did was to remove the aftermarket intake, the AEM EMS and associated stuff and installed an Xflash to scale the big injectyors and an XEDE tuned by Andrew at Dyno4mance in Calhoun GA. That was with "one of those cars"

Your results are not what you could have..... OTOH, your mods and your tuning choice are prolly not going to get the results you want either. Sometimes you just gotta take stock of what you've got, look where you are at and where you want to go. It might be better to cut your losses and look seriously at other alternatives.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:25 AM.