Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

About to get flamed all to hell but.....

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 07:56 AM
  #136  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
aight
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 07:58 AM
  #137  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
Maybe the car is NOT pulling timing at all. Maybe your det sensor is getting no hint of detonation and the car is just running on really aggressive timing and fuel maps. Because if you were pulling timing, you wouldn't be pulling on cammed cars when you weren't cammed(without more mods than you have listed).

and who is "custom tuning" these vishnu cars in texas?

No my car is def. pulling timing. Joeycoates just said so and it is evident by my dyno sessions from Sept. There is no doubt about it.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:01 AM
  #138  
USP45's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 2
From: Frisco
I do not know why you would be leaner now or pulling more timing, you could be but I have no idea how you combination of parts work in concert with each other. Too many new variables to even take a guess, but I certainly do not know how the crank pulley would make the car pull timing. There has been talk of a crank pulley mimicking detonation causing the ECU to retard timing, but this seems to be all conjecture at this point. For all we know your car COULD be pulling timing putting it right to the point of optimal operation. Or maybe the new parts have helped put the car into an area where you no longer have to pull as much timing, however this does not account for the rape of Vincent before the additional mods. Who knows. Maybe the shift points were different between the two drivers, there does not seem to be much to be gained over 6800 on the stock turbo and stock head, even with cams. Maybe Cody just has an extremely well sorted out selection of parts, but if it is true that there was a 4-5 car length difference in 1/8 mile then something is very, very wrong. That is a 100whp difference at least, we are talking 4-5 lengths in 660 feet.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:13 AM
  #139  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Yep, something is up.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:15 AM
  #140  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
A rocket ship to one man is a Pinto to another.
Ironic, as Pintos are a great platform for the 1320 and often used as drag cars. Put some timeslips on the table, and we'll see the truth.

I am sure Andrew's car is a fun ride but this is hardly a comparison.
Its a 1+, though.

I guess Dallas has bad air for a Vishnu car.
It is convenient to say that from several hundred miles away. Timeslips, please.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:16 AM
  #141  
asasin79's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: frisco, tx
ok the one time i got a head start i was within a car or so from cody all the way...i truly believe it is driver skill...or lack of.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:18 AM
  #142  
USP45's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 2
From: Frisco
I don't know Noise, his car could be unusually strong. I think that he ran a very low 12 sec pass before the cams, intercooler piping, and crank pulley. When the turbotrix day rolls around it will be a bit easier to tell. Why don't you come down for it? I know you need an excuse to go driving!

Ok, maybe a high 12 sec pass, still pretty fast.....

Last edited by USP45; Dec 1, 2004 at 08:32 AM.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:19 AM
  #143  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
FWIW, 2nd-4th gear pulls is quite a bit farther than 1/8th mile....QUITE a bit.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:20 AM
  #144  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
Originally Posted by joeycoates
I do not know why you would be leaner now or pulling more timing, you could be but I have no idea how you combination of parts work in concert with each other. Too many new variables to even take a guess, but I certainly do not know how the crank pulley would make the car pull timing. There has been talk of a crank pulley mimicking detonation causing the ECU to retard timing, but this seems to be all conjecture at this point. For all we know your car COULD be pulling timing putting it right to the point of optimal operation. Or maybe the new parts have helped put the car into an area where you no longer have to pull as much timing, however this does not account for the rape of Vincent before the additional mods. Who knows. Maybe the shift points were different between the two drivers, there does not seem to be much to be gained over 6800 on the stock turbo and stock head, even with cams. Maybe Cody just has an extremely well sorted out selection of parts, but if it is true that there was a 4-5 car length difference in 1/8 mile then something is very, very wrong. That is a 100whp difference at least, we are talking 4-5 lengths in 660 feet.

Thats what I have been trying to say. 5 to 6 cars in 2 gears is just not right. Something is wrong.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:21 AM
  #145  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
Originally Posted by joeycoates
I don't know Noise, his car could be unusually strong. I think that he ran a very low 12 sec pass before the cams, intercooler piping, and crank pulley. When the turbotrix day rolls around it will be a bit easier to tell. Why don't you come down for it? I know you need an excuse to go driving!
on a stock clutch?????
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #146  
jason@NTEC's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: denton
Originally Posted by Noize
Ironic, as Pintos are a great platform for the 1320 and often used as drag cars. Put some timeslips on the table, and we'll see the truth.



Its a 1+, though.



It is convenient to say that from several hundred miles away. Timeslips, please.
ironic as it may seem, timeslips are no problem, especially since evotexas drag races semi-professionally.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:25 AM
  #147  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by asasin79
ok the one time i got a head start i was within a car or so from cody all the way...i truly believe it is driver skill...or lack of.
Just so you know, when we race I am not doing anything special. There is no launch technique on the highway and I am shifting carefully since there is no reason to blow something up when screwing around on the street.

Noize, when I had only this:

260 AWHP with
Dynoflash
Cat Delete
Catback (NO DP or anything else)
MBC at 21 psi

I ran a 12.8 @ 106 with a 1.73 60' at Ennis which is a slow track compared to some in CA.

Now with the TT flash and a DP and HKS RS added, I have dynoed ~300 AWHP while pulling timing on pump gas and 19 psi.

Since that dyno I have installed 264's, lower IC pipe, crank pulley, O2 housing and have not been dynoed and the track is closed for winter. Also, I am in no hurry to get back to the track for more launches on my weakening stock clutch.

So take that for whatever it's worth to you. BTW, all dyno numbers are on a Mustang so mark it up for a Dynojet.

Last edited by EVOTEXAS; Dec 1, 2004 at 08:27 AM.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #148  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
FWIW, 2nd-4th gear pulls is quite a bit farther than 1/8th mile....QUITE a bit.
We ran 3rd gear and about half of 4th. Not 2nd and up....
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #149  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Timing being pulled because of the knock sensor sensing noise. Crank pulleys removes the harmonic balancer so the motor is nosier. Computer thinks it's knocking and timing is pulled because of more knock sensor input.


Eric
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:53 AM
  #150  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Timing being pulled because of the knock sensor sensing noise. Crank pulleys removes the harmonic balancer so the motor is nosier. Computer thinks it's knocking and timing is pulled because of more knock sensor input.


Eric
It is pulling timing because of the aggressive timing curve. It was pulling timing before I even thought about buying a crank pulley. Like I said in my previous post, it pulled timing on the dyno with the listed mods. The crank pulley was not one of them. I have had the crank pulley for a week or two only.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:25 AM.