Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

MAf to MAP possible with XEDE (Possibly with MafTPro) + Boost control ?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 08:57 PM
  #1  
ballistic speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: IL
MAf to MAP possible with XEDE (Possibly with MafTPro) + Boost control ?

THis is a question for the guys a vishnu, would it be possible to use a MAP sensor reading instead of a MAF with your XEDE and could you design a pacakge for a MAF delete. Another alternative is can i use MAF Translator Pro with XEDE. Now besides that would the MAP make is so a tune can vary between cold and hot weather without a retune? Or is this open loop settings? What i'm getting at here is that i would like boost control in all conditions with a MAF delete and no need for retunes in varying weather.
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
ballistic speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: IL
Bump
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #3  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by ballistic speed
THis is a question for the guys a vishnu, would it be possible to use a MAP sensor reading instead of a MAF with your XEDE and could you design a pacakge for a MAF delete.
Err, why?

Another alternative is can i use MAF Translator Pro with XEDE. Now besides that would the MAP make is so a tune can vary between cold and hot weather without a retune?
Actually this is more straight forward with MAF than MAP. A density sensor also requires temperature.

Or is this open loop settings? What i'm getting at here is that i would like boost control in all conditions with a MAF delete and no need for retunes in varying weather.
You could _add_ a MAP to the Xede inputs and use it. I believe closed loop boost control was to be included in v3, but I think it got sent to the back burner.

d
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 01:56 AM
  #4  
Dustin@Vishnu's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, Ca
Yeah, I guess I dont understand why you would want to run a MAP instead of a MAF?
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #5  
ballistic speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: IL
Less restrictive, plus i'm making custom piping so i can get rid of that hoking huge unit and i can get more room to manuever tubing
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 10:55 PM
  #6  
leif's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca
the red car put down 490whp on shiv's dyno with a maf..... i hardly think its restrictive.
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 07:05 AM
  #7  
ballistic speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: IL
oh, it's restrictive, just not that badly, i gurantee you if you removed the maf from the red car it would put down more
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 07:25 AM
  #8  
donour's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 1
From: Tennessee, USA
Originally Posted by ballistic speed
oh, it's restrictive, just not that badly, i gurantee you if you removed the maf from the red car it would put down more
So why not use a blow-by?

d
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #9  
ballistic speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: IL
again, need the space becasue i'm all about the little details, anything like that in my opinion clogs up room, i want it gone, i'm a honda boy, i like newer tech and map is one of them, if's more "efficent", gives me more room to do some custom work on the engine bay, and it plain looks better
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jon H
Private 'Evo 1 - 9' For Sale / Wanted
12
Dec 30, 2004 09:13 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 AM.