Stage package interchangeability
Stage package interchangeability
Shiv,
For your stage packages, what do they all share together. Eventually i'd like to wind up with stage 2, but would like to get there progressively. I don't want to buy parts that will only be not used in a later stage. All I can think of now is that they all use the same following: 1) xede 2) fuel pump 3) cam gears 4) cams. Is that it?
Also what is your take on the cam situation? What are the pros/cons to running 264/264, or 264/272, or 272/272? Your currently running the 272/272 setup right?
Thanks again for the info! Keep up the good work!
John
PS Hows the intake coming?
For your stage packages, what do they all share together. Eventually i'd like to wind up with stage 2, but would like to get there progressively. I don't want to buy parts that will only be not used in a later stage. All I can think of now is that they all use the same following: 1) xede 2) fuel pump 3) cam gears 4) cams. Is that it?
Also what is your take on the cam situation? What are the pros/cons to running 264/264, or 264/272, or 272/272? Your currently running the 272/272 setup right?
Thanks again for the info! Keep up the good work!
John
PS Hows the intake coming?
Re: Stage package interchangeability
Originally posted by johnnyevo
Shiv,
For your stage packages, what do they all share together. Eventually i'd like to wind up with stage 2, but would like to get there progressively. I don't want to buy parts that will only be not used in a later stage. All I can think of now is that they all use the same following: 1) xede 2) fuel pump 3) cam gears 4) cams. Is that it?
Also what is your take on the cam situation? What are the pros/cons to running 264/264, or 264/272, or 272/272? Your currently running the 272/272 setup right?
Thanks again for the info! Keep up the good work!
John
PS Hows the intake coming?
Shiv,
For your stage packages, what do they all share together. Eventually i'd like to wind up with stage 2, but would like to get there progressively. I don't want to buy parts that will only be not used in a later stage. All I can think of now is that they all use the same following: 1) xede 2) fuel pump 3) cam gears 4) cams. Is that it?
Also what is your take on the cam situation? What are the pros/cons to running 264/264, or 264/272, or 272/272? Your currently running the 272/272 setup right?
Thanks again for the info! Keep up the good work!
John
PS Hows the intake coming?
the staggard setup really maximizes the stock turbos effeciency. IMHO 264s arent worth the effort and expense. 272s might be in the future and I would run them with a bigger turbo.
I always tell people that really in truly stage 1+ is sick- It makes for a very fast car and I wouldnt be supprised to see very low 12s maybe a high 11 soon
Re: Stage package interchangeability
Originally posted by johnnyevo
Shiv,
For your stage packages, what do they all share together. Eventually i'd like to wind up with stage 2, but would like to get there progressively. I don't want to buy parts that will only be not used in a later stage. All I can think of now is that they all use the same following: 1) xede 2) fuel pump 3) cam gears 4) cams. Is that it?
Also what is your take on the cam situation? What are the pros/cons to running 264/264, or 264/272, or 272/272? Your currently running the 272/272 setup right?
Thanks again for the info! Keep up the good work!
John
PS Hows the intake coming?
Shiv,
For your stage packages, what do they all share together. Eventually i'd like to wind up with stage 2, but would like to get there progressively. I don't want to buy parts that will only be not used in a later stage. All I can think of now is that they all use the same following: 1) xede 2) fuel pump 3) cam gears 4) cams. Is that it?
Also what is your take on the cam situation? What are the pros/cons to running 264/264, or 264/272, or 272/272? Your currently running the 272/272 setup right?
Thanks again for the info! Keep up the good work!
John
PS Hows the intake coming?
Ever part of stage 1+ will be used in stage II. I do know the down pipe will be diffrent.
272/264 looks like the winning combo but if your looking to do the stage II (witch you might not be after driving a Stage 1+ car with over 340whp DYNOJET) then 272/272 would make better sence.
We should meet up soon. I want to give a quick ride with my new mods.
Eric
Eric what are some of your new mods? , since last time all you had was the Xede and a catback from Vinshu.
Also wont the 272/272 combo (for idle issues ) would be better ran on EMS , since a friend of mine has that set up and it iddles stock or near stock.
Can the Xede with the Flash do that ??
An went upgrading to the 264/272 staggard cam combo . do you need to upgrade to ARP head studs ???
Also wont the 272/272 combo (for idle issues ) would be better ran on EMS , since a friend of mine has that set up and it iddles stock or near stock.
Can the Xede with the Flash do that ??
An went upgrading to the 264/272 staggard cam combo . do you need to upgrade to ARP head studs ???
Originally posted by GokuSSj4
Eric what are some of your new mods? , since last time all you had was the Xede and a catback from Vinshu.
Also wont the 272/272 combo (for idle issues ) would be better ran on EMS , since a friend of mine has that set up and it iddles stock or near stock.
Can the Xede with the Flash do that ??
An went upgrading to the 264/272 staggard cam combo . do you need to upgrade to ARP head studs ???
Eric what are some of your new mods? , since last time all you had was the Xede and a catback from Vinshu.
Also wont the 272/272 combo (for idle issues ) would be better ran on EMS , since a friend of mine has that set up and it iddles stock or near stock.
Can the Xede with the Flash do that ??
An went upgrading to the 264/272 staggard cam combo . do you need to upgrade to ARP head studs ???
Shiv can make the car idle with X-flash perfectly. I will be using the combo xflash and xede. Do you need to upgrade to ARP head studs? well that's not a bad idea and also you should upgrade the fuel pump when doing cams IMHO.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Shiv can make the car idle with X-flash perfectly.
Shiv can make the car idle with X-flash perfectly.

The term perfectly conjures up the notion of being unable to tell a cam'd car from a stock car. While most folks wouldn't be able to distinguish between them, I think some people will notice the difference (although slight, of course).
Cheers,
shiv
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
I don't know about 'perfectly' but certainly 'better than expected'
The term perfectly conjures up the notion of being unable to tell a cam'd car from a stock car. While most folks wouldn't be able to distinguish between them, I think some people will notice the difference (although slight, of course).
Cheers,
shiv
I don't know about 'perfectly' but certainly 'better than expected'

The term perfectly conjures up the notion of being unable to tell a cam'd car from a stock car. While most folks wouldn't be able to distinguish between them, I think some people will notice the difference (although slight, of course).
Cheers,
shiv
Shiv can get them to idle just about perfectly.
Trending Topics
Whats up Eric!
You know me, there's no such thing as enough power. Stage 2 should fit the bill for a daily street driver! Definitely will be meeting up when the weather breaks, I'm really impressed with this car! I wish I never wasted my time with the WRX, but then I wouldnt have met you, or shiv, and, whatever!
Talk to ya soon,
John
PS Eric STILL doesnt have his MR2 running yet
You know me, there's no such thing as enough power. Stage 2 should fit the bill for a daily street driver! Definitely will be meeting up when the weather breaks, I'm really impressed with this car! I wish I never wasted my time with the WRX, but then I wouldnt have met you, or shiv, and, whatever!
Talk to ya soon,
John
PS Eric STILL doesnt have his MR2 running yet


