Notices
West Region Includes AZ, CA, HI, NV, UT.

Las Vegas Evo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 01:38 AM
  #51286  
gonzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by McLaren F1 2003
and what the hell was that van trapping? i couldnt make out the numbers though. it looked like high 90's though, which means the cars he raced had terrible drivers haha

sucks for them
Van traps 99mph and ran a best of 13.2. Plus he trees the hell out of everybody.
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 01:52 AM
  #51287  
DJJimGreen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by gonzo
Van traps 99mph and ran a best of 13.2. Plus he trees the hell out of everybody.
and you know they wouldn't include all the races the van got whomped on..
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 01:53 AM
  #51288  
gonzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by evowario
Officially corn fed thanks to ddp.
What numbers you putting down?
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 01:54 AM
  #51289  
gonzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by DJJimGreen
and you know they wouldn't include all the races the van got whomped on..
I don't think he got whooped on that much to be honest. Poor drivers FTL!
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 02:33 AM
  #51290  
DJJimGreen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by gonzo
I don't think he got whooped on that much to be honest. Poor drivers FTL!
Damn.. getting a van to that level is impressive but really? They make it sound like it's running 9's or somethin..
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 04:24 AM
  #51291  
Alan Szabo Jr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
I raced a turbo van 2 years ago... In this video it ran pretty slow but I saw it at the track the following year and I believe it ran in the 12s before they blew it up.

My SE vs the Van
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 05:47 AM
  #51292  
althemean's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
what up alan. Tell your old man I said hi.
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 06:06 AM
  #51293  
Alan Szabo Jr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Will do!

Hows the Evo going?
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #51294  
twabtoxer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 751
Likes: 5
From: vegas baby
Originally Posted by gonzo
Which one of you **** let this van hand you your asses. Now he's going around talking **** on the internets. LOL!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqsbqXKLXN0
i was there but didnt get to run against that beast i may be wrong but the fastest i seen it run was like 13.0 or something like it
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #51295  
DJJimGreen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Got a few potential buyers for AEM finally (thank god).. going for fairly cheap but that's alright. They have gone silent for the past day though, so hoping they aren't bailing..
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #51296  
Early EVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 267
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
Done back to back to back testing with ECU based boost control versus a Hallman and a Forge. For most setups, ease of adjustment and reliability. Its hard to beat the Hallman or Forge for repeatability. You want to change your boost level, very easily done. Biggest thing I don't like about any of the solenoids. Is anything can happen with the boost, haven't seen the ECU to be 100% repeatedable. You could make five runs in a row and overlay the graphs and the boost will fluctuate. Since the ECU looks at many tables and variables. Sometimes not much, other times as much as a pound or more. Do the same thing with the Manual and its very hard to tell the runs apart. Just my opinion. A Mechanical device such as a manual boost controller does one of two things, it either works or it doesn't. Not a whole lot of in between. Unless the checkball gets moisture and rusts. Most of the new manual controllers have a Ceramic ball, so that possibility is gone. I put the electronic controllers in the same category as the ECU controlled setup. Unique, all James Bond in nature. But for tuning especially, they can be limiting, time consuming and frustrating. Last thing you need is the boost moving around on its own, i.e. fuzzy logic, learning modes, etc. When making timing changes and you can see the results as easily.

Its hard on the EVO to keep the boost up in the top RPM range. The 03-05 will hold a flatter boost curve with less drop than a IX. Almost regardless of the stock bolt on frame turbo being used. Even the HD actuators on a IX do little to emulate a boost curve of an 8.
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #51297  
Early EVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 267
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
I know the guy who built the Van. Unfortunately its over a foot too long to fit on the dyno. They are just getting started with the setup. Wait till its making some real power. Plus it weighs almost 7000 with passengers in it.
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #51298  
McLaren F1 2003's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Early EVO
Done back to back to back testing with ECU based boost control versus a Hallman and a Forge. For most setups, ease of adjustment and reliability. Its hard to beat the Hallman or Forge for repeatability. You want to change your boost level, very easily done. Biggest thing I don't like about any of the solenoids. Is anything can happen with the boost, haven't seen the ECU to be 100% repeatedable. You could make five runs in a row and overlay the graphs and the boost will fluctuate. Since the ECU looks at many tables and variables. Sometimes not much, other times as much as a pound or more. Do the same thing with the Manual and its very hard to tell the runs apart. Just my opinion. A Mechanical device such as a manual boost controller does one of two things, it either works or it doesn't. Not a whole lot of in between. Unless the checkball gets moisture and rusts. Most of the new manual controllers have a Ceramic ball, so that possibility is gone. I put the electronic controllers in the same category as the ECU controlled setup. Unique, all James Bond in nature. But for tuning especially, they can be limiting, time consuming and frustrating. Last thing you need is the boost moving around on its own, i.e. fuzzy logic, learning modes, etc. When making timing changes and you can see the results as easily.

Its hard on the EVO to keep the boost up in the top RPM range. The 03-05 will hold a flatter boost curve with less drop than a IX. Almost regardless of the stock bolt on frame turbo being used. Even the HD actuators on a IX do little to emulate a boost curve of an 8.
so is that a no, you dont do ecu-controlled boost? haha
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #51299  
Early EVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 267
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
boost

Lots of choices with EVO parts and setups, controllers. As one guy just said to me, " parts is parts, it doesn't matter who made them, they all do the same thing. "
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #51300  
McLaren F1 2003's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
haha, fun stuff...ill hit you up when i switch to e85



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:56 AM.