RA / 3000GT SL comparison
Originally Posted by ralliart99VR4
I was being sarcastic. No way in hell an RA can beat a VR4.
Btw, my turbos are just fine, and my VR4 in general is mint
Another thing is: VR4 = R/T TT
Btw, my turbos are just fine, and my VR4 in general is mint

Another thing is: VR4 = R/T TT
I am using my friends address to post this and you are all retarded, I live in Portland, Or. and my weak little 3000 SL will beat the daylights out of your little 4 banger if you have a turbo then you will at least be able to read my license plate as I pass you contact this this posting and he will get in touch with me if you would like to RACE!
Originally Posted by BMW_traitor
I am using my friends address to post this and you are all retarded, I live in Portland, Or. and my weak little 3000 SL will beat the daylights out of your little 4 banger if you have a turbo then you will at least be able to read my license plate as I pass you contact this this posting and he will get in touch with me if you would like to RACE!
Originally Posted by ralliart99VR4
Yesm he is using his friend's address -- his friend's FIRST post. Come on, dude, you know you are full of it. Are you on 3si?
Originally Posted by BMW_traitor
Actually it really was a friend using my sign on, and he's just a little proud of his 3000GT SL, and absoutly refuses to believe there is such a car out there that could be faster, unless you count the F1 McClaren, then he would most likely bow down. I on the other hand have driven both the 3000GT SL & the Ralliart, and imo the Ralliart has alot more potential and is definately a lighter car. That's why I bought one. 
Tell your friend that, if he really is into his FWD SL, he can join 3si and ask people who've put TT motors or just added turbos to their SLs. There is still hope.
However, for looks alone, your friend will probably get luckier in a 3000GT than in a Ralliart
Originally Posted by BMW_traitor
Actually it really was a friend using my sign on, and he's just a little proud of his 3000GT SL, and absoutly refuses to believe there is such a car out there that could be faster, unless you count the F1 McClaren, then he would most likely bow down. I on the other hand have driven both the 3000GT SL & the Ralliart, and imo the Ralliart has alot more potential and is definately a lighter car. That's why I bought one. 
Originally Posted by ralliart99VR4
Ha ha. Congrats to you on making that choice!
Tell your friend that, if he really is into his FWD SL, he can join 3si and ask people who've put TT motors or just added turbos to their SLs. There is still hope.
However, for looks alone, your friend will probably get luckier in a 3000GT than in a Ralliart
Tell your friend that, if he really is into his FWD SL, he can join 3si and ask people who've put TT motors or just added turbos to their SLs. There is still hope.
However, for looks alone, your friend will probably get luckier in a 3000GT than in a Ralliart

i raced a 3000gtSL today and i beat him. my friend owns a toyota echo and i bet he would bet the 3000gt. dont under estimate an echo cause they are fast! i always race the echo and every time he is about a meter away from my rear bumper! the 3000gt was about a car leanth away from my rear bumper.
Take note that there were three trims of 3000GTs:
1) Base --- 3.0 liter SOHC (~165 hp FWD)
2) SL --- 3.0 liter DOHC (222 hp FWD)
3) VR4 --- 3.0 liter DOHC TT (320 hp AWD, AWS)
Are you suuuuuuuure you guys are not talking about the base 3000GT?
1) Base --- 3.0 liter SOHC (~165 hp FWD)
2) SL --- 3.0 liter DOHC (222 hp FWD)
3) VR4 --- 3.0 liter DOHC TT (320 hp AWD, AWS)
Are you suuuuuuuure you guys are not talking about the base 3000GT?
1991 Dodge Stealth ES 7.1 15.60
1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT SL 8.5 16.40
The SL always came with the 3.0 liter 222hp. I would hope that considering both cars had the same engine that they would produc numbers that the stealth did. I personally had a stealth with a few mods and was able to get a 15.2 in the 1/4. Then the diff busted and I sold it, but it was good time. As the time I got the stealth I thought it was fast until I raced a 94 5.0 Mustang GT. I will take back my thoughts and at that point in time I began realizing there are faster cars out there. For looks though I still would have to argue that a 3/S has most cars beat. They are simply a beautiful automobile.
1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT SL 8.5 16.40
The SL always came with the 3.0 liter 222hp. I would hope that considering both cars had the same engine that they would produc numbers that the stealth did. I personally had a stealth with a few mods and was able to get a 15.2 in the 1/4. Then the diff busted and I sold it, but it was good time. As the time I got the stealth I thought it was fast until I raced a 94 5.0 Mustang GT. I will take back my thoughts and at that point in time I began realizing there are faster cars out there. For looks though I still would have to argue that a 3/S has most cars beat. They are simply a beautiful automobile.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roversix
09+ Lancer Ralliart General
176
Nov 24, 2014 04:48 PM
EVIL_EV0
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
46
Dec 23, 2007 07:49 PM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
80
Dec 29, 2005 06:17 AM









