Sleeper?...
Debadge the Ralliart paint the fmic and get GTS badges. Just tell people that you got the EVO X style hood and your ready to race. Throw a few stickers at it and you got a car no one will take seriously.
So just the other day I was sitting around looking at the RA's statistics and some pics and it hit me... If you bought a RA and traded out your bumpers and hood w/ a GTS owner.... You'll have one hell of a sleeper
An AWD turbo lancer look a like FTW!
I'd buy one if mitsu would actually make a damn six speed for these bad boys.
An AWD turbo lancer look a like FTW!
I'd buy one if mitsu would actually make a damn six speed for these bad boys.
For me the meaning of sleeper is a following:
Any production car , which have an unexpected performance is a sleeper.
the opposite:
Any car which have unexpectedly less performance is a rice

what i mean really is :
If you have a Lancer with stock exterior or simple modification on it, but 400 whp, that is a sleeper.
If you have a Lancer with extensive exterior modification on it, and 400 whp , is not a sleeper.
If you have a Lancer with extensive exterior modification it and stock engine, they call it rice.
So degrading a car is not making a car sleeper.
This my opinion about the sleeper status.
Last edited by Robevo RS; Jan 2, 2009 at 07:37 AM.
what is the sleeper means to you?
For me the meaning of sleeper is a following:
Any production car , which have an unexpected performance is a sleeper.
the opposite:
Any car which have unexpectedly less performance is a rice
what i mean really is :
If you have a Lancer with stock exterior or simple modification on it, but 400 whp, that is a sleeper.
If you have a Lancer with extensive exterior modification on it, and 400 whp , is not a sleeper.
If you have a Lancer with extensive exterior modification it and stock engine, they call it rice.
So degrading a car is not making a car sleeper.
This my opinion about the sleeper status.
For me the meaning of sleeper is a following:
Any production car , which have an unexpected performance is a sleeper.
the opposite:
Any car which have unexpectedly less performance is a rice

what i mean really is :
If you have a Lancer with stock exterior or simple modification on it, but 400 whp, that is a sleeper.
If you have a Lancer with extensive exterior modification on it, and 400 whp , is not a sleeper.
If you have a Lancer with extensive exterior modification it and stock engine, they call it rice.
So degrading a car is not making a car sleeper.
This my opinion about the sleeper status.
I also agree the lancer looks alot faster than it really is, but the 4b's have huge potential! as long as we got companies out there looking to go all the way to tune it and supply forged internals to fully build it.
^agreed, but I'm not saying leave the engine stock... that would be stupid. I'm saying take the car and make it look like a base lancer. If you modded a RA for 350+ awhp and made it look like a stock lancer than you got a nice sleeper, IMO.
I also agree the lancer looks alot faster than it really is, but the 4b's have huge potential! as long as we got companies out there looking to go all the way to tune it and supply forged internals to fully build it.
I also agree the lancer looks alot faster than it really is, but the 4b's have huge potential! as long as we got companies out there looking to go all the way to tune it and supply forged internals to fully build it.
Yeah i like my look. Doesn't look or sound turbo. People think the FMIC is just a radiator?? C'mon. People that know the base lancers (4g94) are slow are gonna think they're slow either way. The new GTS some people have no idea.
In my mind, to make a Ralliart a true sleeper, you would have to make it look like a base Lancer DE. To top it off, you would probably want the color silver or gray and not red or orange.
Example (not a DE, but close enough):
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi..._Lancer_ES.jpg
Now if someone made a Ralliart look like that photo above, I'd call it a sleeper.
Although, personally I would not bother doing it.
I don't see how making it look like a GTS would work. It looks too sporty to fool whoever you are trying to fake out... I'd say in general, not many people would have enough knowledge to know that a GTS would be "slow" by looking at it.
Example (not a DE, but close enough):
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi..._Lancer_ES.jpg
Now if someone made a Ralliart look like that photo above, I'd call it a sleeper.
Although, personally I would not bother doing it. I don't see how making it look like a GTS would work. It looks too sporty to fool whoever you are trying to fake out... I'd say in general, not many people would have enough knowledge to know that a GTS would be "slow" by looking at it.
IMO for a true sleeper, you buy the base and then soup it up. Not buy the souped up version and dress it down. IE base car with engine transplant to something extreme that no one knows is in there.
Auto trannies arent for racing, never have been. It may shift fast but it gets glitchy and auto trans have always been weaker. I am pissed they didnt give the evo x's a 6-spd m/t option
ya, I guess your right since the RA's don't even have a 5-spd option.
If the 4b11 on the 08's can be turbo'd by
and reach 280hp. Than if a company produces internals you can turbo a 4b11 ff to reach 280 easy. And if you have a 4b12 you should be able to reach 300hp w/ only the internals and turbo if not more.just saying it would be cheaper to buy the RA and dress it down. 27,000 for the RA and trade bumpers and hood with a GTS owner and than take the wing and RA rear badge off and slap a single exhaust on.
sleepers are fun but it's also nice to have a fast looking car that goes fast

or in my case a fast looker but a creeper
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JMB8606
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Jul 17, 2006 02:21 AM








