Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Considering a 2010 Ralliart or 2010 WRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #31  
Groundfades's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Canada
i have raced 3 wrx 265's and a couple wrx in the 08 09 trim at the track. Beat all of them badly (prior to some mods).

Additionally they were running low 15's here or high 14's (6000 ft elevation) while stock sportbacks were running 14.5 14.6.

I had a long look at both cars but decided on the ralliart for the tc-sst, and i love it.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:12 PM
  #32  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Groundfades
i have raced 3 wrx 265's and a couple wrx in the 08 09 trim at the track. Beat all of them badly (prior to some mods).

Additionally they were running low 15's here or high 14's (6000 ft elevation) while stock sportbacks were running 14.5 14.6.

I had a long look at both cars but decided on the ralliart for the tc-sst, and i love it.
is that with the mods you have listed? If all they are running are 15's then it could have been bad driver.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #33  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,835
Likes: 283
From: US
Originally Posted by Groundfades
i have raced 3 wrx 265's and a couple wrx in the 08 09 trim at the track. Beat all of them badly (prior to some mods).

Additionally they were running low 15's here or high 14's (6000 ft elevation) while stock sportbacks were running 14.5 14.6.

I had a long look at both cars but decided on the ralliart for the tc-sst, and i love it.
that may have been the case but i don't think anyone here is really going to argue that a stock ralliart is as quick as a stock wrx265 with the same driver.. makes a big difference, plus you need more skill when you're trying to drag race a manual tranny car, over just brake torquing and clicking paddles
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:15 PM
  #34  
PCToolsWiki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: 818 SoCal
Originally Posted by boondoc
Sorry Malik but i had an 03 Lancer and the interior in your Evo is no better. You prolly don't like the X either.

OP: It depends how you see things. Keep in mind though jus because it doesn't have clutch pedal doesn't mean its an automatic. Technically and essentially it is a manual transmission for the simple fact that it operates through clutches and not a torque converter like an automatic transmission would. Do not be fooled. I see where you are coming from thought and if you really want to feel connected and that you are in total control then the SST isn't for you. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't test drive it either, you might end up liking it, trust me there are a lot of ppl who had the same mind set as you including myself and ended up buying one or an MR. You cannot knock it if you don't try it. With the RA though you do get a bit more safety features and technology (FAST key, bluetooth, battery saver, etc.) standard and not to mention the AWD from the IX which is why there is almost a 3k difference. The RA runs 14.0-14.5 in the 1/4 depending on driver, far from slow and with a flash your will be in the mid to high 13's. I will say this though mid 12's are achievable with bolt ons, X or FP Red turbo and a tune but that would be pushing the stock clutch packs, if you want more then you will have to upgrade them.

As for the WRX if you want more performance and absolutely must have a manual tranny then that is the car to buy, i will say drive it as well, I wasn't blown away by it and the interior isn't light years ahead of the RA in any way. Its fast for what it is and you can't go wrong if you need that performance up front. But from a family car and comfort stand point the RA would probably be the better choice. The transmission makes city driving tolerable and you can still have fun with it believe it or not.

Also have you looked at the Cobalt SS and the Speed 3? Those cars are pretty good for the price.
Cobalt SS is hideous. Speed3 is ugly as well...won't get either. Plus I prefer AWD.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #35  
Malik_EvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Area
Originally Posted by Charm25
The difference in price is based on the transmission; in the ralliart you are getting a hight technology transmission and the WRX is just a old school transmission, in a couple of years from now almost every car will have sequential tranny; WRX has better interior plastic than Ralliart for sure and reliability of the transmission in the long term is about to figure out; nonetheless mitsu ralliart tranny comes from Germany, just buy a entended warranty bumper to bumper to 5 years/100.000 miles.

You can find a 2010 ralliart for less of $28K OTD in NYC
That = alot of warranty work
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #36  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,835
Likes: 283
From: US
Originally Posted by PCToolsWiki
Cobalt SS is hideous. Speed3 is ugly as well...won't get either. Plus I prefer AWD.
I've actually been in considerations for some time regarding a daily driver. For now, I've decided to go with a 2010 GTI - gorgeous interior, 6speed, great motor etc. FWD doesn't bother me for daily driver. AWD only helps to accelerate in the snow - doesn't help turning or stopping, a big misconception about awd.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #37  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
just throwing this out there, but have you considered an 08 used X with low miles? In this economy you might be able to get a good price on it. Just throwing that out there.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #38  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by kyooch
I've actually been in considerations for some time regarding a daily driver. For now, I've decided to go with a 2010 GTI - gorgeous interior, 6speed, great motor etc. FWD doesn't bother me for daily driver. AWD only helps to accelerate in the snow - doesn't help turning or stopping, a big misconception about awd.
3 time car of the year award winner.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #39  
Malik_EvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Area
Originally Posted by Methodical4u
just throwing this out there, but have you considered an 08 used X with low miles? In this economy you might be able to get a good price on it. Just throwing that out there.
+1 there are still alot of left over 08 evo x's all over...... and they go for like 30k and i am sure there are great financing deals on a 08 evo x
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #40  
PCToolsWiki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: 818 SoCal
I am not a fan of the WRX Hatch..I personally think it is ugly unless it is the STI. I also don't really want to get the same car as my roomate since we work together too.

I never expected a Mitshu forum to overwhelmingly pick the WRX.

The only mods I would do to either car is Intake and maybe exhuast.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:38 PM
  #41  
PCToolsWiki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: 818 SoCal
I have had a RWD 06 Mustang GT and now a FWD 05 SRT-4 and I really prefer the comfort of AWD.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #42  
Malik_EvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Area
Then get the R/A when i was at my local mitsu dealer test driving the evo MR i was told there is a offer 2.9 apr for 60 months which is hard to resist.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:48 PM
  #43  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by PCToolsWiki
I have had a RWD 06 Mustang GT and now a FWD 05 SRT-4 and I really prefer the comfort of AWD.
yeah, neither of those cars compare to either of the ones you are looking at IMO. I would go with the WRX unless you can find a nice X for somewhere in your budget.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 04:28 PM
  #44  
PCToolsWiki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: 818 SoCal
It is looking like the WRX because for 2 grand less you get more of a car.

Is the SST Transmission that bad?
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #45  
boondoc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Inbetween Miami and Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by PCToolsWiki
Cobalt SS is hideous. Speed3 is ugly as well...won't get either. Plus I prefer AWD.
LOL aight just giving you options based on your concern for price to power ratio.

The reason you're getting a lot of bias towards WRX here is because they are Evo owners and bias toward conventional manual. Where are the modded RA owners? Like i said though if a manual is what you want then the WRX is what u need to buy out of the two.

But make sure you drive both before you make your decision. And if intake and exhaust is what you only really planning on doing then the Ralliart is more than capable of putting down good power. The intake will require a tune. I do agree maybe you should look at some left over 08 X's for a good deal.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 AM.