Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

Considering a 2010 Ralliart or 2010 WRX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 11:44 AM
  #76  
tipoytm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by mixedwun
Don't get me wrong I am not saying I would not buy it again, because it is unreliable or a POS car. In fact I still like the car. Mainly I wouldn't buy it again, because of the new career path I will be on. It is not really the best work car as far as picking up people and so on. But yeah I own the RA and performance vs performance its not even close if that's the deciding factor.
Then your opinion had nothing to do with the cars themselves... it's based on your personal situation which has absolutely no value to this thread. I'm sorry you bought the wrong type of car... which has happened to my family a couple of times after "situations" changed.

Still, the fact remains that both the WRX and RA are two serious bang-for-the-buck cars out there today, and the holidays is perfect time to find a great deal on one.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 11:56 AM
  #77  
mixedwun's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Originally Posted by tipoytm
Then your opinion had nothing to do with the cars themselves... it's based on your personal situation which has absolutely no value to this thread. I'm sorry you bought the wrong type of car... which has happened to my family a couple of times after "situations" changed.

Still, the fact remains that both the WRX and RA are two serious bang-for-the-buck cars out there today, and the holidays is perfect time to find a great deal on one.
Dude chill out lol. I didn't bash the car at all, hell I own it. But I don't want to be like a lot of people on forums who say nothing but "it can be modded to be as fast" or "RA ALL THE WAY". I wanted to give my true opinion. And lets be honest the majority of what is said on this forum is strictly opinion. If you go to a WRX forum its completely opposite, because that's their opinion.

And yeah, I happened to add that the statement had little to nothing to do with his situation........right after I made the statement.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:02 PM
  #78  
PCToolsWiki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: 818 SoCal
I am not planning on modding the car past intake and exhaust so I don't see a need to have to upgrade the SST tranny in the future.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:04 PM
  #79  
tipoytm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: CA
mixedwun, no problem, it's all good. I just see too many threads with people bashing on cars or systems (like the SST) had no substance or nothing to do with real facts. Of course opinions are always welcome since this is an open forum, but lets try to be as objective as possible.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:06 PM
  #80  
mixedwun's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Originally Posted by PCToolsWiki
I am not planning on modding the car past intake and exhaust so I don't see a need to have to upgrade the SST tranny in the future.
Yeah you should be well within the limits. With the intake make sure you get a tune, or you may have problems with it. The tune/flash is the best bang for you buck mod on this car so far and there's a few companies you can choose from.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #81  
tipoytm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by PCToolsWiki
I am not planning on modding the car past intake and exhaust so I don't see a need to have to upgrade the SST tranny in the future.
I'm not sure about the RA's intake, but the X's stock intake is fine till you upgrade the turbo. What matters is the tune... both the X and the RA have pig-rich tunes from the factory... getting a custom dyno tune is the best basic mod for it, along with a decent catback or turbo-back exhaust (if you want to go catless).

Last edited by tipoytm; Dec 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #82  
boondoc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Inbetween Miami and Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by PCToolsWiki
I am not planning on modding the car past intake and exhaust so I don't see a need to have to upgrade the SST tranny in the future.
Then you should be fine. Check out this homade intake

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/09...n-70-00-a.html

Like mixedwun said you will need a tune to run the intake. Or you can get just a drop in filter either works, k&n, or HKS for about $50 and that will suffice even w/o a tune. Quite a few ppl are goin that route.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #83  
PCToolsWiki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: 818 SoCal
Will the ECU tune void the warranty? Also will it pass California smog?
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #84  
boondoc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
From: Inbetween Miami and Ft. Lauderdale
Some dealers wouldn't know if you return it to stock b4 warranty work. And yes it should pass Cali specs but pm GST Motorsports or RRM more about that they would be able to give you a better answer than I since they are both base in Cali.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #85  
mixedwun's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Originally Posted by PCToolsWiki
Will the ECU tune void the warranty? Also will it pass California smog?
Technically anything you do to the car will void the warranty. At least the part that deals with the aftermarket part. ecu tune could void all of the engine/tranny components because it changes the performance of the engine. Same with the exhaust, if you have a problem that may have stemmed from the part they can refuse service. Just be careful modding if you still are planing on using the warranty. A lot depends on the dealership your dealing with.

Can't really help you on the smog.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #86  
PCToolsWiki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: 818 SoCal
Guess I will just replace the stock drop in air filter with a K&N one.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #87  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by tipoytm
^ You have to understand both cars are go-fast AWD econoboxes (and priced accordingly), they are not BMWs or Lexus luxury cars... so you can't expect the interiors to be noteworthy. You mainly buy them for their performance and tunability.

The SST tranny is not made to launch, if you like beating on your transmission, a manual car is your only choice (still you have to change your clutch on regular basis if you like launching). I for one don't treat my rides as drag cars, but that's a personal choice.

As for the recalls, I've had 3 done on my X so far, and I don't mind it at all. It's great that Mitsu is actually taking action to correct these minor safety issues. None of them are directly related to the dependability/reliability of the powertrain or drivetrain.
what do you think the GTI is? It's interior is found to be quite nice by pretty much everyone.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #88  
tipoytm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: CA
OP is in Sherman Oaks, plenty of reputable local tuners there... HB Speed, Looney Tuning, etc. GST has a lot of experience in tuning RAs, they are in Hayward (Bay Area).

If I were the OP, my first mods would be (done at the same time).
1.) Exhaust
2.) Boost Pill
3.) dyno or road tune

Drop-in filter is okay, but not necessary if you are going for a tune.
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 12:59 PM
  #89  
Ladogaboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Track/autocross performance: WRX, I have no idea why someone would say RA given that the RA puts down worse handling numbers than the WRX and we have yet to see a shootout (like the MRT shootout) where the RA wins. The RA is not an Evo, it doesn't have S-AYC, it doesn't have Brembos and it doesn't have the track-oriented suspension. Yes it can handle well but as we have all seen, you need to replace the tires and upgrade the brakes which adds 2000$ to the cost rather quickly. Even with new tires, the RA doesn't blow the doors off the WRX as Edmunds showed (even though they put better tires on the RA than the WRX had). It does make a huge difference though and makes the car far too close to determine a winner.
With the same tires, the RAs slalom time improved to significantly higher than the WRX. The only other stock head-to-head run was Dsport's review where someone left off a vacuum hose on the RA, so it was down somewhere between 50-70 whp (depending on whose dyno you use) from its stock trim.

As for the comment about insurance. Same driver, same location, same insurance coverage, same insurance provider, new RA from older WRX = $20 less per month in insurance. Can't speak for the insurance on a V6 Camaro.


Originally Posted by ambystom01
Drive both and decide for yourself.
+1 I'm out. / thread
Old Dec 14, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #90  
tipoytm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by Methodical4u
what do you think the GTI is? It's interior is found to be quite nice by pretty much everyone.
GTI has an upscale interior, but the OP said he was looking for an AWD platform. I don't know about the tunability and mod potential of the GTI's powertrain, but in stock form... it is also a great choice, considering it won multiple awards. Car & Driver has a new article pitting it against a MazdaSpeed3, and the GTi won as the overall better car. Plus, it's got decent fuel economy (22/31?) for a turbo, but power is substantially less, around 200hp/torque.

Last edited by tipoytm; Dec 14, 2009 at 01:06 PM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:45 PM.