Brembo Front BBK
I will post a dynamic system model for a car experiencing breaking. (You will need MATLab to view it) It will be a little crued because it is a waste of time. But here is a quick referene on how to do it. If you don't understand its okay, I wouldn't expect you too without being a senior level engineer or higher. You must have experience in dynamic control systems.
I have MATLab on my computer, so that shouldn't be a problem. In fact, I just got done reworking an algorithm that I wrote to generate new ECU data tables for a project that I have been working on for awhile now. Anyhow, this is great information, I have to say. I looked through the paper. I will admit that the math is a little bit complicated, but I get the gist of things, I think. Thumbs up!
If you want to work through it yourself and need help email me! I would be more than glad to help you out. I tutor every level engineering class so I have a grat understanding of pretty much everthing, especialy MATLab lol. But you will need to look up the state space function, in MATLab it is ss(A,B,C,D) where A,B,C,D are your system state space matrices. Also it will helkp if you know how to use the syms function so that MATLab can do the algrebra for you. But yeah, give it a shot, it will definately help you in any dynamic systems and vibrations r controls class you will take. Btw EE are really good with this stuff too!
Bigger brakes exist because larger rotors have a higher thermal capacity and can cool better, larger calipers means more pistons (which can help with pedal feel among other things) and larger pads means better pad cooling and better longevity.
You're arguing against established brake knowledge and physics. Pad area has no effect on stopping distance, nor does rotor diameter. You are welcome to the research yourself, but suffice to say you are wrong.
Real world showing what I'm saying
http://www.zeckhausen.com/Testing_Brakes.htm
http://www.modified.com/roadtests/07...est/index.html
Good FAQ that discusses the physics behind brakes
http://www.ffcobra.com/FAQ/brakes3.html
Nice quote from that FAQ
You're arguing against established brake knowledge and physics. Pad area has no effect on stopping distance, nor does rotor diameter. You are welcome to the research yourself, but suffice to say you are wrong.
Real world showing what I'm saying
http://www.zeckhausen.com/Testing_Brakes.htm
http://www.modified.com/roadtests/07...est/index.html
Good FAQ that discusses the physics behind brakes
http://www.ffcobra.com/FAQ/brakes3.html
Nice quote from that FAQ
BTW if you would have those articles you would have noticed the first quote:
"Tires stop a car, not brakes. Even if that's a broad statement, full of caveats and qualifiers, it contains a crucial truth."
The bigger rotors and calipers stop the tire rotating quicker. However, just because the tire is not rotating does not mean you are not still going to be moving. You will need extremely awesome tires to match the performance of your brakes.
BTW if you would have those articles you would have noticed the first quote:
"Tires stop a car, not brakes. Even if that's a broad statement, full of caveats and qualifiers, it contains a crucial truth."
The bigger rotors and calipers stop the tire rotating quicker. However, just because the tire is not rotating does not mean you are not still going to be moving. You will need extremely awesome tires to match the performance of your brakes.
"Tires stop a car, not brakes. Even if that's a broad statement, full of caveats and qualifiers, it contains a crucial truth."
The bigger rotors and calipers stop the tire rotating quicker. However, just because the tire is not rotating does not mean you are not still going to be moving. You will need extremely awesome tires to match the performance of your brakes.
The friction is the real stopping power and it is NOT related to the psi. It is related to the force normal to the plane of contact. Friction is also a function of surface area contact. Making them bigger will generate way more friction.
Last edited by ambystom01; Feb 24, 2010 at 06:00 PM.
can we just leave it at , your only as good as your weakest link.
its a combo if different things. Tires, Brakes, Suspension/ weight distribution. So many variables when it comes to stopping and handling.
just get an upgraded design like slotted rotors and call it a day
its a combo if different things. Tires, Brakes, Suspension/ weight distribution. So many variables when it comes to stopping and handling.
just get an upgraded design like slotted rotors and call it a day
can we just leave it at , your only as good as your weakest link.
its a combo if different things. Tires, Brakes, Suspension/ weight distribution. So many variables when it comes to stopping and handling.
just get an upgraded design like slotted rotors and call it a day
its a combo if different things. Tires, Brakes, Suspension/ weight distribution. So many variables when it comes to stopping and handling.
just get an upgraded design like slotted rotors and call it a day

I don't bother posting anything regarding brakes on here anymore cause Amby always tries to jam his thoughts down your throat. If you have different thaughts to him your wrong (apparently even if you're a mechanical engineer and know what you're on about!!!!!).
Yes, it's all my fault
. I'm forcing people to read the links I provide and forcing them to read my posts.
Edit: After doing more research, while increasing rotor size does increase brake torque (as I said earlier), this does not affect stopping distance. It does however play a role in brake bias.
More links for you.
Straight from Stoptech, a manufacturer of big brakes.
http://www.stoptech.com/tech_info/faqs.shtml
http://www.trackpedia.com/wiki/Brakes
. I'm forcing people to read the links I provide and forcing them to read my posts.Edit: After doing more research, while increasing rotor size does increase brake torque (as I said earlier), this does not affect stopping distance. It does however play a role in brake bias.
More links for you.
Straight from Stoptech, a manufacturer of big brakes.
http://www.stoptech.com/tech_info/faqs.shtml
http://www.trackpedia.com/wiki/Brakes
Last edited by ambystom01; Feb 24, 2010 at 03:11 PM.
LMAO abby just give up; you are so wrong that its hard to withsdtand not correcting you. If brake are what stopped a car, and not the tires, then the brakes would be in contact with the ground. TIRES STOP THE CAR! BRAKES STOP THE TIRES FROM ROTATING! Shut up now because you are wrong. You cannot even read the links you provided well enough to interpret what they are saying. You want a real link, read mine posted on the last page.
LMAO abby just give up; you are so wrong that its hard to withsdtand not correcting you. If brake are what stopped a car, and not the tires, then the brakes would be in contact with the ground. TIRES STOP THE CAR! BRAKES STOP THE TIRES FROM ROTATING! Shut up now because you are wrong. You cannot even read the links you provided well enough to interpret what they are saying. You want a real link, read mine posted on the last page.
In post 19, I clearly state that. In other BBK threads, I clearly state it. Perhaps you should read the thread before calling people on things they didn't do. I was referring to this statement
The bigger rotors and calipers stop the tire rotating quicker.
It will dramatically change pedal feel but the stopping distance is more an issue of the tires and the friction of the pads than anything else.
(you've likely seen them on some sites, where they glue to your existing caliper and look like Endless, Brembo, etc. calipers...but don't actually do anything)
from my experiences, i upgraded both the tyres and the bbk (from mrt) and the stopping distance and performance has been significantly improved and brake fade is non-existent.
i upgraded the tyres first and noticed a difference and then combined with the bbk later, noticed a significant difference - especially driving through the hills
i upgraded the tyres first and noticed a difference and then combined with the bbk later, noticed a significant difference - especially driving through the hills
I'm guessing the BBK came with new brake pads? I'm guessing they were significantly more aggressive than the stockers (which by all accounts aren't very performance-minded pads) thus, combined with stickier tires, resulted in shorter stopping distances. There's also a difference between better braking and perceived better braking.


