Injen CAI set to be released
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC ; Statesville, NC
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
eggh its ok i had injen cai on my gts before , it showed gains... My final results were 149WHP and 171 trq. CVT
dyno sheet
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1231/duno2001zi4.jpg
dyno sheet
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1231/duno2001zi4.jpg
#18
nice! I have an Injen SRI on my tiburon and I love it....im very interested to see how they managed to squeeze the CAI in our engine bay.....the IC piping looks really good too! hopefully they will price them right...
#26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC ; Statesville, NC
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
that sheet is real. and no its not only intake its headers, injen catback, injen intake. that gave me 149WHP base was 127whp.
sorry i should have clarified that in the beginning
sorry i should have clarified that in the beginning
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC ; Statesville, NC
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
well think what you want. i didn't suck out that sheet out of my finger. its real no photoshop. i just told you what i had on my lancer and those are the results. my base was 127hp..... and with rrm headers, injen catback and injen intake where dyno shows i ended up with 149whp. sorry that you don't believe me. but i have no reason to lie about what i gained with that setup. that car is long gone anyways and i am looking to better things with my ralliart. Even injen claims 11HP gain and 10 lbs ft trq. So if you have questions about that and don't believe it i think you should contact injen and have them prove to you that the intake in fact gains 11HP. Remember everything has to due with elevation, what dyno was used, and may be because it was 20 degrees outside it helped me out also. So if i would have dynoed my car where you lived i might only gained 18HP instead of 22Hp. or less..
I just wanna leave it at that because i don't wanna have beef with anyone here on evom.
I just wanna leave it at that because i don't wanna have beef with anyone here on evom.
Last edited by Jake26; May 15, 2009 at 09:40 AM.
#29
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: victorville, ca
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its possible depending on the car almost everyone that had a focus with the 2.3ltr pzev motor gained around 32whp with intake header and exhaust. but if you had seen the restrictive intake and exhaust then you would understand lol by the time i was done with my focus it hadI/H/E tune flywheel clutch and balance shaft removal and i dynoed at 169. i never baselined but most baseline between 120-125 so i gained around 45
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC ; Statesville, NC
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
its possible depending on the car almost everyone that had a focus with the 2.3ltr pzev motor gained around 32whp with intake header and exhaust. but if you had seen the restrictive intake and exhaust then you would understand lol by the time i was done with my focus it hadI/H/E tune flywheel clutch and balance shaft removal and i dynoed at 169. i never baselined but most baseline between 120-125 so i gained around 45
Last edited by Jake26; May 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM.