Notices

post WOT shift hesitation... anyone else?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 03:32 PM
  #16  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by razorlab
No logs...
fixed.... and added rom. I blame it on taco mac and their Belgian ale selection i need to dial in the base duty cycle and desired boost tables to cut down on the correction. Once i get the boost curve where I want it (till the X swap) I will start to dial in the fuel and timing.

Last edited by Mad_SB; Apr 7, 2011 at 03:41 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 03:53 PM
  #17  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
You should log WGDCcorrection to see if it really is correcting (although you can cross reference your base WGDC tables too but logging WGDCcorrection is faster/easier)
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 04:44 PM
  #18  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by razorlab
You should log WGDCcorrection to see if it really is correcting (although you can cross reference your base WGDC tables too but logging WGDCcorrection is faster/easier)
I will do that along with the next revision of the base duty cycle tables and get some more logs. Though I think the attached screen shot makes it easier to see that correction is going on.. at least to my eye.. the flow rate drops correspond to the boost error as do the the base duty cycles... Thanks for taking a look Bryan.
Attached Thumbnails post WOT shift hesitation... anyone else?-log5.jpg  

Last edited by Mad_SB; Apr 7, 2011 at 04:52 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 05:59 AM
  #19  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Yo Bryan.. what offset / rpn are you using with the stand alone logger for duty cycle correction?

I have the following and it is not working properly as can be seen from the attached logs from this AM:
paramname=WGDCCorr
paramid=0x808783
databits=8
scalingrpn=x,0.5,*,64,-

Did not feel the hesitation in either pull (log 6 is 3rd into 4th, log 7 is 4th). Though it looks a little bit like I might be getting some rich missfire from time to time.

I still need to drop the base duty cycles a bit and tone down either the correction interval or the correction magnitude in the first couple cells either side of zero boost error.

I also need to start working on the fueling. I have lean spool turned off so that may account for the rich condition during shifts.. or it could just be the way the load is tracking... one more revision to the boost config and I should be ready to dig in on the fueling.
Attached Files
File Type: zip
LOGS6and7.zip (4.9 KB, 0 views)
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2011 | 09:26 PM
  #20  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Mad_SB
Yo Bryan.. what offset / rpn are you using with the stand alone logger for duty cycle correction?

I have the following and it is not working properly as can be seen from the attached logs from this AM:
paramname=WGDCCorr
paramid=0x808783
databits=8
scalingrpn=x,0.5,*,64,-

Did not feel the hesitation in either pull (log 6 is 3rd into 4th, log 7 is 4th). Though it looks a little bit like I might be getting some rich missfire from time to time.

I still need to drop the base duty cycles a bit and tone down either the correction interval or the correction magnitude in the first couple cells either side of zero boost error.

I also need to start working on the fueling. I have lean spool turned off so that may account for the rich condition during shifts.. or it could just be the way the load is tracking... one more revision to the boost config and I should be ready to dig in on the fueling.
I use BoostError since I am using PSI-Target

238085A2
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 03:41 AM
  #21  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by razorlab
I use BoostError since I am using PSI-Target

238085A2
Yup, already logging psi boost error:

paramname=BoostError
paramid=0x8085A2
databits=16
scalingrpn=x,128,-,0.0483675,*
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Syrihl
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
11
Feb 4, 2012 02:32 PM
Mad_SB
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
8
May 10, 2011 02:29 PM
JP EVO X
Motor Sports
6
Jun 22, 2010 12:36 PM
Rik84
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
2
Jan 17, 2010 12:28 PM
raytrix
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
8
Sep 23, 2009 03:23 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:37 AM.