fr34k

iTrader: (14)

Hey there guys, I just got tuned for E85 and made 465hp & 440ft/lbs at 28psi on Dynapack
I have 2.3L + GT30R
well, I tried measuring 60-100mph time using Apexi RSM and got 3.92 seconds
technically my time is 62-100mph since it measures 100-160kmh
anyway, I just think this is a more accurate reading to compare power, compared to 0-60times, and even comparing dyno to dyno..

Let's get this thread going!

Whp : 465
Wtq : 440
60-100 time : 3.92




just for comparison, according to http://www.torquestats.com/index.php?pid=mph60_100 , the GTR does it in 5.0, murcielago LP640 in 4.6 and Ferrari 599 in 3.9
so should be interesting to compare!

For comparison
Koenigsegg CCR 1.4s
Koenigsegg CCX 2.0s
Ultima GTR720 2.7s
Bugatti Veyron 3.0s
Ascari A10 3.0s
McLaren F1 3.1s
Porsche Carrera GT 3.2s
Ruf CTR Yellow Bird 3.2s
Ferrari Enzo 3.2s
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 3.6s
Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 3.7s
Pagani Zonda C12 S 7.3 3.7s
Chevrolet Corvette Callaway C16 3.7s
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 3.8s
Porsche 911 997 GT2 3.9s
Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 3.9s
Ferrari F40 4.1s
Chevrolet Corvette Z06 4.2s
Jaguar XJ220 4.3s
Ferrari F50 4.3s
TVR Cerbera 4.5 4.4s
Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG 4.5s
TVR Sagaris 4.6s
Porsche 959 4.6s
Dodge Viper GTS 4.6s
Ascari KZ1 4.6s
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 4.6s
Porsche 911 GT3 RS 997 4.6s
Noble M400 4.6s
Caterham 7 Superlight R500 4.7s
Porsche 911 Turbo 997 4.7s
Ferrari F430 4.7s
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 4.7s
BMW Alpina B5 E60 4.8s
Porsche 911 GT3 996 4.8s
TVR Tamora 4.9s
Aston Martin Vantage 600 5.0s
Ford GT 5.0s
TVR Tuscan S 5.0s
Cadillac CTS-V auto 5.0s
Nissan R35 GTR 5.0s

kyoo

iTrader: (29)

Also, the evo8 fq400 is 5.8 seconds

chaotichoax

iTrader: (149)

this is a warning for anyone who posts in this thread...any mention of street racing or public roads will get you an infraction

considering 60-100 is not exactly your everyday speed limit

vtec2mivec

iTrader: (8)

that's a very good time! Mine would probably be double

DRAGHICI

iTrader: (2)

So your saying that you also have a super car huh?

Well you do!

drop24

What's the drivetrain power loss of an evo vs. say that ferrari?

Mautofied.IS300

iTrader: (12)

This is a really good way to measure power and how much faster one car truly is to another. All the M3 guys only use this to compare, they rarely post dynos. They use a different system that uses gps and compensates for % grade in the road. Were you going up or downhill during your run because that really affects times.

-Will

El.BlueEvo9

iTrader: (4)

Never tried

fr34k

iTrader: (14)

well I guess I have an econo-supercar with cheap gas! haha
I tried to do the run on the flattest surface I can find, to make it fair.
everyone should really find out what's their cars' times rather than comparing dyno numbers which are actually uncomparable

Evolution IVGSR

iTrader: (42)

I want a Air Port Runway to see what I can do in my car and top speed runs too

Evolution IVGSR

iTrader: (42)

Well, what if? I lived in Germany and was on the Autoban? Like the guy that would drive his McLearn F1 Everyday to work on the autoban doing 200+MPH

PVD04

iTrader: (23)

When I was on the stock turbo I would always do 40-80 mph runs because it gave a good representation of the full RPM range (3500-7000) and would not involve a shift. It's also a lot safer due to the lower speeds involved.

-Paul

El.BlueEvo9

iTrader: (4)

That would suck

DRAGHICI

iTrader: (2)

and the famous Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII MR FQ400 only did 5.8s

i remember my friend from Europe spoke about these times and how important they are for performance comparisons

EVO8LTW

iTrader: (41)

Yeah...much easier to compare RPM-to-RPM in 3rd. Anyone who datalogs can just pull the duration off their logs.