The power of the BR3065 and flash!!
Not to take anything away from your impressive C16 numbers but I made about the same AWHP #'s as you but more tq. on 93 +Meth and slightly higher room temps....
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
again great numbers......
will you drive on C16 all the time?
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
again great numbers......
will you drive on C16 all the time?
Last edited by Blue Evo 8; Aug 27, 2006 at 02:54 PM.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I have seen others - Particularly Fury365 who have had less spectaculat results on this turbo when using a mis mosh of non Buschur parts
It shows that the Buschur mod combos work very well as a combination
It shows that the Buschur mod combos work very well as a combination
well like he said...it was a very conservitive tune. he is only running 10.5afr in stead of 11.1. and 21 lbs. if he went to the more agressive tune and the weather wasnt so shotty. the numbers would have been right up aroud there.
cant wait to go for a ride. maybe well be able to find some vettes that want to play!!!!
cant wait to go for a ride. maybe well be able to find some vettes that want to play!!!!
Originally Posted by Blue Evo 8
Not to take anything away from your impressive C16 numbers but I made about the same AWHP #'s as you but more tq. on 93 +Meth and slightly higher room temps....
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
Originally Posted by WrX Kila
So Are you saying if someone buys this turbo... to see good results they should use all buschur supporting mods?
Originally Posted by bechbum82
cant wait to go for a ride. maybe well be able to find some vettes that want to play!!!!
Originally Posted by dryad001
Impressive numbers then.
But what it all comes down to is what it can do at the track...
We will find that out soon enough.
Originally Posted by Blue Evo 8
Not to take anything away from your impressive C16 numbers but I made about the same AWHP #'s as you but more tq. on 93 +Meth and slightly higher room temps....
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
again great numbers......
will you drive on C16 all the time?
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
again great numbers......
will you drive on C16 all the time?
I have no doubt that this turbo would produce those numbers and higher on a second ecu or aem. But I dont see the point without a built block..
Originally Posted by kmcconn9
Another thing to consider is that I am using the same ecu/tune for the pump/alky tune as I am the race gas tune. So, that means that the tune does not change going from pump/alky to c16. Which we all know will not produce as high of numbers without taking additional timing and a/f out....
I have no doubt that this turbo would produce those numbers and higher on a second ecu or aem. But I dont see the point without a built block..
I have no doubt that this turbo would produce those numbers and higher on a second ecu or aem. But I dont see the point without a built block..
True, I'm on a stock block and head now....I drive my EVO on weekends, and mash it only when I have to.....
Time to save for a stroker block
Originally Posted by Blue Evo 8
Not to take anything away from your impressive C16 numbers but I made about the same AWHP #'s as you but more tq. on 93 +Meth and slightly higher room temps....
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
again great numbers......
will you drive on C16 all the time?
I was expecting the 3065 to put you at 540-550 on C16
again great numbers......
will you drive on C16 all the time?


