Injector "gunk" and E-85
Google is your friend.
I'm sure there are no concrete answers, but I will mention that when I had my Evo in the Tri-Cities, I had zero gunk build-up even after a full year of continuous E85 that was consistently measuring out at 72% ethanol. I was on the stock PCV system at the time. Within six months of moving my Evo to Portland and a completely different brand of E85, I started experiencing rough cold starts, and not unexpectedly, the injectors had become gunked up.
I recently switched to a crankcase ventilation system that does not use the intake manifold for PCV, so I should pull my injectors, document, clean, and reinstall.
I recently switched to a crankcase ventilation system that does not use the intake manifold for PCV, so I should pull my injectors, document, clean, and reinstall.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Interesting comment about the possible relationship with ethanol content. I mistakenly wrote earlier that Tricities e85 is 72%. It's actually 75%. The place where I get e85 in Portland is consistently 82%. It's not a big increase, but it is a bit higher.
Here a cut/paste direct from Chevron regarding PIB:
Polyisobutylene (PIB)-based deposit-control fuel additives are
polymeric chemicals used as additives in engine fuel (such as
gasoline) to keep sludge, soot, oxidation products, and other
deposit precursors from forming deposits onto and harming key
engine parts. These deposits can rob an engine of power, reduce
fuel economy, and increase harmful emissions.
Heres the PDF link:
https://www.oronite.com/pdfs/polyiso...hipsummary.pdf
Post# 130 is still our best description of the gunk problem. Unless youre a Chemist / Automotive Engineer all this is just dis-information
I do like the humble gent who knows where he stands
Last edited by MinusPrevious; Feb 22, 2014 at 06:23 PM.
Not sure where you got your information. Certainly wont be noting any of your comments as accurate, expert commentary LOL
Here a cut/paste direct from Chevron regarding PIB:
Polyisobutylene (PIB)-based deposit-control fuel additives are
polymeric chemicals used as additives in engine fuel (such as
gasoline) to keep sludge, soot, oxidation products, and other
deposit precursors from forming deposits onto and harming key
engine parts. These deposits can rob an engine of power, reduce
fuel economy, and increase harmful emissions.
Heres the PDF link:
https://www.oronite.com/pdfs/polyiso...hipsummary.pdf
Post# 130 is still our best description of the gunk problem. Unless youre a Chemist / Automotive Engineer all this is just dis-information
I do like the humble gent who knows where he stands
Here a cut/paste direct from Chevron regarding PIB:
Polyisobutylene (PIB)-based deposit-control fuel additives are
polymeric chemicals used as additives in engine fuel (such as
gasoline) to keep sludge, soot, oxidation products, and other
deposit precursors from forming deposits onto and harming key
engine parts. These deposits can rob an engine of power, reduce
fuel economy, and increase harmful emissions.
Heres the PDF link:
https://www.oronite.com/pdfs/polyiso...hipsummary.pdf
Post# 130 is still our best description of the gunk problem. Unless youre a Chemist / Automotive Engineer all this is just dis-information
I do like the humble gent who knows where he stands
Please re-read what you are posting." Polyisobutylene (PIB)-based deposit-control fuel additives"
Chevron is avoiding telling you what they are using in as a detergent. They are using a derivative of PIB. NOT PIB PIB-Mannichs/amines/succinimides are NOT what is collecting on our injectors.
If you apply this same logic to the Evo platform we're all driving "Evo 1's/Lancer ES's" depending how you look at it.
I'm fairly sure when I was trying to figure this thing out I read some chevron patents on the uspto relating to detergents. You can look them up, i promise PIB is not whats used.
If this issue was truly the FUEL's fault and not the design of the motor don't you think major car makers would be lobbying the lawmakers to change the process for manufacturing it? Or there would be some lawsuits for warranty reimbursement due to fuel contamination?
The only role the fuel plays is the content of e85 vs gasoline. Remember PIB is soluble in gas and not e85 this is why a tank of gas cleans the injectors. This is also why the association has been made about "where you get it".
It's not about being humble or arrogant, its about giving the community a better understanding of the information. Creating a theory thats logical and has explanation then being confident enough to throw it out in the open and defend it. I could've laid over and stopped fighting with you but i'll continue defending until someone blows my theory all to pieces and sends me packing.
The idea you're clinging to about the concentration of fuel additives is blown to bits by the GM testing data. PM me your email, i'll e-mail you the doc so you can read it for yourself.
Let me get something straight. I'm not trying to be arrogant and saying "I've got it completely right" because I have some grey area. Mainly to do with the conversion of the detergent to PIB. I'm an engineer but not a chemical engineer, the polarity of ethanol theory did in fact come from a chemical engineer I consulted.
Now, instead of just saying "this is right" because it was posted earlier and you "think" its right...... Show me why its right! I can show you why its wrong..... Show me why its right!
Did some digging & although this link is a bad copy of a white paper titled: Throttle Deposits in Automotive Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines
http://books.google.com/books?id=v-Z...posits&f=false
The PIB notes begin on pg 114-117. Seems to me this MS Engineer concluded that throttle deposits are made up of PIB
Post no. 130 is still our best, most detailed conclusion on the makeup of this gunk
You Sir have made an error in your statement. PIB is certainly a solvent used in Gasoline
Did some digging & although this link is a bad copy of a white paper titled: Throttle Deposits in Automotive Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines
http://books.google.com/books?id=v-Z...posits&f=false
The PIB notes begin on pg 114-117. Seems to me this MS Engineer concluded that throttle deposits are made up of PIB
Post no. 130 is still our best, most detailed conclusion on the makeup of this gunk
Did some digging & although this link is a bad copy of a white paper titled: Throttle Deposits in Automotive Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines
http://books.google.com/books?id=v-Z...posits&f=false
The PIB notes begin on pg 114-117. Seems to me this MS Engineer concluded that throttle deposits are made up of PIB
Post no. 130 is still our best, most detailed conclusion on the makeup of this gunk
jump over to page 117.
"In conclusion, the source of the deposit material is delivered by the PVC system and the deposit material originates as engine oil additives."
Go read it for yourself.
Last edited by CammedEvo; Mar 1, 2014 at 12:37 PM.
I'm trying to tell you all PIB buildup is not dependent on additives in the e85. It is dependent on Oil/PCV and the ratio of e85 to gas.
Last edited by CammedEvo; Mar 1, 2014 at 12:34 PM.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
The only thing anyone seems to be able to agree on is that running a few tanks of 93 through your car as a way of helping clear the injectors from extended use of E85.
I make it a point to run on 93 for a little while after running E for a few weeks. Just in case. I don't 650+ daily anyway.
I make it a point to run on 93 for a little while after running E for a few weeks. Just in case. I don't 650+ daily anyway.
The only thing anyone seems to be able to agree on is that running a few tanks of 93 through your car as a way of helping clear the injectors from extended use of E85.
I make it a point to run on 93 for a little while after running E for a few weeks. Just in case. I don't 650+ daily anyway.
I make it a point to run on 93 for a little while after running E for a few weeks. Just in case. I don't 650+ daily anyway.
e70 stock pcv -> no gunk
>e85 stock pcv -> gunk
my next test case will be no pcv and high ethanol content.
My last post I was saying I had pulled my injectors (1250cc FIC's) to inspect and send in for cleaning if necessary. I originally looked into them as I found one of the seals were starting to crack so not bad to pull them out and replace the seals and o-rings.
Anyway once out I found them to be quite dirty. I decided to send them back to FIC to have them cleaned and flow tested. I was quite surprised when I got the call from FIC saying they looked great and were spraying with in one percent of each other. I had them clean them anyway for that warm fuzzy but the after cleaning results were about the same as the original flow test. Just thought I would share what I found not that this would be the case for everyone. Cheers!
Anyway once out I found them to be quite dirty. I decided to send them back to FIC to have them cleaned and flow tested. I was quite surprised when I got the call from FIC saying they looked great and were spraying with in one percent of each other. I had them clean them anyway for that warm fuzzy but the after cleaning results were about the same as the original flow test. Just thought I would share what I found not that this would be the case for everyone. Cheers!
My last post I was saying I had pulled my injectors (1250cc FIC's) to inspect and send in for cleaning if necessary. I originally looked into them as I found one of the seals were starting to crack so not bad to pull them out and replace the seals and o-rings.
Anyway once out I found them to be quite dirty. I decided to send them back to FIC to have them cleaned and flow tested. I was quite surprised when I got the call from FIC saying they looked great and were spraying with in one percent of each other. I had them clean them anyway for that warm fuzzy but the after cleaning results were about the same as the original flow test. Just thought I would share what I found not that this would be the case for everyone. Cheers!
Anyway once out I found them to be quite dirty. I decided to send them back to FIC to have them cleaned and flow tested. I was quite surprised when I got the call from FIC saying they looked great and were spraying with in one percent of each other. I had them clean them anyway for that warm fuzzy but the after cleaning results were about the same as the original flow test. Just thought I would share what I found not that this would be the case for everyone. Cheers!









