Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

Injector "gunk" and E-85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 11:02 AM
  #181  
CammedEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
^^^If ARGHX7's post is accurate, & I believe it is, this is the simple summary of the mechanism that is causing the black tar substance


Since this post, I now flush my system w/a few tank fulls of 91

Been on E85 for over 5 years, Im satisfied w/the explanation
I probably wouldn't take advice from a post that has incorrect information. Let's clear something up. Polyisobutylene is a colorless polymer and not a engine detergent. Think of those awful rubber kitchen gloves.. thats what it is. Hardly a engine detergent.

Google is your friend.

Originally Posted by mrfred
I'm sure there are no concrete answers, but I will mention that when I had my Evo in the Tri-Cities, I had zero gunk build-up even after a full year of continuous E85 that was consistently measuring out at 72% ethanol. I was on the stock PCV system at the time. Within six months of moving my Evo to Portland and a completely different brand of E85, I started experiencing rough cold starts, and not unexpectedly, the injectors had become gunked up.

I recently switched to a crankcase ventilation system that does not use the intake manifold for PCV, so I should pull my injectors, document, clean, and reinstall.
I too experienced the same phenomena after moving to CA. I chalk it up to the higher content e85 that is sold in this area year around since PIB is not very soluble in pure polar protic solvents.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 12:18 PM
  #182  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Interesting comment about the possible relationship with ethanol content. I mistakenly wrote earlier that Tricities e85 is 72%. It's actually 75%. The place where I get e85 in Portland is consistently 82%. It's not a big increase, but it is a bit higher.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 04:49 PM
  #183  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by CammedEvo
I probably wouldn't take advice from a post that has incorrect information. Let's clear something up. Polyisobutylene is a colorless polymer and not a engine detergent. Think of those awful rubber kitchen gloves.. thats what it is. Hardly a engine detergent.
Not sure where you got your information. Certainly wont be noting any of your comments as accurate, expert commentary LOL

Here a cut/paste direct from Chevron regarding PIB:

Polyisobutylene (PIB)-based deposit-control fuel additives are
polymeric chemicals used as additives in engine fuel (such as
gasoline) to keep sludge, soot, oxidation products, and other
deposit precursors from forming deposits onto and harming key
engine parts. These deposits can rob an engine of power, reduce
fuel economy, and increase harmful emissions.

Heres the PDF link:
https://www.oronite.com/pdfs/polyiso...hipsummary.pdf

Post# 130 is still our best description of the gunk problem. Unless youre a Chemist / Automotive Engineer all this is just dis-information


I do like the humble gent who knows where he stands

Last edited by MinusPrevious; Feb 22, 2014 at 06:23 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2014 | 07:51 PM
  #184  
CammedEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
Not sure where you got your information. Certainly wont be noting any of your comments as accurate, expert commentary LOL

Here a cut/paste direct from Chevron regarding PIB:

Polyisobutylene (PIB)-based deposit-control fuel additives are
polymeric chemicals used as additives in engine fuel (such as
gasoline) to keep sludge, soot, oxidation products, and other
deposit precursors from forming deposits onto and harming key
engine parts. These deposits can rob an engine of power, reduce
fuel economy, and increase harmful emissions.

Heres the PDF link:
https://www.oronite.com/pdfs/polyiso...hipsummary.pdf

Post# 130 is still our best description of the gunk problem. Unless youre a Chemist / Automotive Engineer all this is just dis-information


I do like the humble gent who knows where he stands
Once again, butyl rubber aka PIB aka polyisobutylene is not a detergent. It is rubber.

Please re-read what you are posting." Polyisobutylene (PIB)-based deposit-control fuel additives"

Chevron is avoiding telling you what they are using in as a detergent. They are using a derivative of PIB. NOT PIB PIB-Mannichs/amines/succinimides are NOT what is collecting on our injectors.

If you apply this same logic to the Evo platform we're all driving "Evo 1's/Lancer ES's" depending how you look at it.

I'm fairly sure when I was trying to figure this thing out I read some chevron patents on the uspto relating to detergents. You can look them up, i promise PIB is not whats used.

If this issue was truly the FUEL's fault and not the design of the motor don't you think major car makers would be lobbying the lawmakers to change the process for manufacturing it? Or there would be some lawsuits for warranty reimbursement due to fuel contamination?

The only role the fuel plays is the content of e85 vs gasoline. Remember PIB is soluble in gas and not e85 this is why a tank of gas cleans the injectors. This is also why the association has been made about "where you get it".

It's not about being humble or arrogant, its about giving the community a better understanding of the information. Creating a theory thats logical and has explanation then being confident enough to throw it out in the open and defend it. I could've laid over and stopped fighting with you but i'll continue defending until someone blows my theory all to pieces and sends me packing.

The idea you're clinging to about the concentration of fuel additives is blown to bits by the GM testing data. PM me your email, i'll e-mail you the doc so you can read it for yourself.

Let me get something straight. I'm not trying to be arrogant and saying "I've got it completely right" because I have some grey area. Mainly to do with the conversion of the detergent to PIB. I'm an engineer but not a chemical engineer, the polarity of ethanol theory did in fact come from a chemical engineer I consulted.

Now, instead of just saying "this is right" because it was posted earlier and you "think" its right...... Show me why its right! I can show you why its wrong..... Show me why its right!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 11:38 AM
  #185  
Solenoid's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 253
Likes: 5
From: Laguna Beach California
Originally Posted by CammedEvo
Polyisobutylene is a colorless polymer and not a engine detergent. Think of those awful rubber kitchen gloves.. thats what it is. Hardly a engine detergent.

Google is your friend
You Sir have made an error in your statement. PIB is certainly a solvent used in Gasoline

Did some digging & although this link is a bad copy of a white paper titled: Throttle Deposits in Automotive Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines

http://books.google.com/books?id=v-Z...posits&f=false

The PIB notes begin on pg 114-117. Seems to me this MS Engineer concluded that throttle deposits are made up of PIB

Post no. 130 is still our best, most detailed conclusion on the makeup of this gunk
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #186  
CammedEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino
Originally Posted by Solenoid
You Sir have made an error in your statement. PIB is certainly a solvent used in Gasoline

Did some digging & although this link is a bad copy of a white paper titled: Throttle Deposits in Automotive Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines

http://books.google.com/books?id=v-Z...posits&f=false

The PIB notes begin on pg 114-117. Seems to me this MS Engineer concluded that throttle deposits are made up of PIB

Post no. 130 is still our best, most detailed conclusion on the makeup of this gunk
AWESOME FIND DUDE!

jump over to page 117.

"In conclusion, the source of the deposit material is delivered by the PVC system and the deposit material originates as engine oil additives."

Go read it for yourself.
Attached Thumbnails Injector "gunk" and E-85-screen-shot-2014-03-01-12.13.51-pm.png  

Last edited by CammedEvo; Mar 1, 2014 at 12:37 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 12:27 PM
  #187  
CammedEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino
I'm trying to tell you all PIB buildup is not dependent on additives in the e85. It is dependent on Oil/PCV and the ratio of e85 to gas.

Last edited by CammedEvo; Mar 1, 2014 at 12:34 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 08:07 PM
  #188  
Oxford's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
I daily drive on corn juice, I really need to take out my injectors and see what they look like. So far no problems.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 08:23 PM
  #189  
grazzo77's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Pulled mine this afternoon and they are filthy. They will be on the way back to FIC this week for cleaning.

Last edited by grazzo77; Mar 19, 2014 at 06:46 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 12:28 PM
  #190  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
The only thing anyone seems to be able to agree on is that running a few tanks of 93 through your car as a way of helping clear the injectors from extended use of E85.

I make it a point to run on 93 for a little while after running E for a few weeks. Just in case. I don't 650+ daily anyway.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 01:12 PM
  #191  
CammedEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino
Originally Posted by SmurfZilla
The only thing anyone seems to be able to agree on is that running a few tanks of 93 through your car as a way of helping clear the injectors from extended use of E85.

I make it a point to run on 93 for a little while after running E for a few weeks. Just in case. I don't 650+ daily anyway.
We should start logging everyones crank case ventilation setups and ethanol content that report the issue.

e70 stock pcv -> no gunk
>e85 stock pcv -> gunk

my next test case will be no pcv and high ethanol content.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2014 | 03:09 PM
  #192  
grazzo77's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
My last post I was saying I had pulled my injectors (1250cc FIC's) to inspect and send in for cleaning if necessary. I originally looked into them as I found one of the seals were starting to crack so not bad to pull them out and replace the seals and o-rings.
Anyway once out I found them to be quite dirty. I decided to send them back to FIC to have them cleaned and flow tested. I was quite surprised when I got the call from FIC saying they looked great and were spraying with in one percent of each other. I had them clean them anyway for that warm fuzzy but the after cleaning results were about the same as the original flow test. Just thought I would share what I found not that this would be the case for everyone. Cheers!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 10:55 PM
  #193  
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 162
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by grazzo77
My last post I was saying I had pulled my injectors (1250cc FIC's) to inspect and send in for cleaning if necessary. I originally looked into them as I found one of the seals were starting to crack so not bad to pull them out and replace the seals and o-rings.
Anyway once out I found them to be quite dirty. I decided to send them back to FIC to have them cleaned and flow tested. I was quite surprised when I got the call from FIC saying they looked great and were spraying with in one percent of each other. I had them clean them anyway for that warm fuzzy but the after cleaning results were about the same as the original flow test. Just thought I would share what I found not that this would be the case for everyone. Cheers!
So...stock PCV or no? E%?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2014 | 07:54 AM
  #194  
grazzo77's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Stock PCV. E85.
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 03:31 PM
  #195  
CammedEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino
Something else to add here.. what relationship does the amount of voltage that gets transferred to the tip of the injector play in deposit formation.

Note: I switch polarity at 1:00 and you start to see a fair amount of voltage on the tip.

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:45 PM.