Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

CES eth content sensor installed, flex fuel patch coming soon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2012 | 07:07 AM
  #91  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by SmurfZilla
Whats the status of this?
Sorta dead. I know I can do it, but it just hasn't been a priority.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #92  
donner's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Actually I just came from testing flexfuel patch in my IX, I wanted to test it on car with final version before writing here. I did not test it yet with sensor but I simulated ethanol content sensor with potentiometer and everything looked to work like expected. As my car is EDM I made this patch on the top of 8858 v7, of course code is portable to all evo's 7-9 if there is just little space on rom (not needed much). I used naming F=Flexfuel for this mod, ie. 8858F714.

It works as follows:
- ethanol content sensor is needed and ecu needs 0-5V signal from it, I used input pin 64 so map switching does not work anymore from that source (and on the other hand there is not anymore maps to change except boost maps)
- analog voltage is used for table look-up to get interpolation factor (see picture of tuning maps)
- based on value from this table program interpolates linearly between normal and alternate maps: 0%=normal maps only and 100%=alternate maps only, other values between are interpolated so if you tune your car with both std gasoline and E85, all values should be between these two maps and this idea should work pretty well.
- interpolation is made also between primer pulse maps to help starting in cold environment, injector interpolation factor is used for this


Also I made few safety and other features:
- analog input safety (low/high limits, forces interpolator values to safe values in such case if wire is broken). If safety activates, CEL is blinking to tell driver that something is not right.
- force interpolator factor to 0% or 100% for tuning purposes
- bypass safety function (force overrides safety)

How do you guys think? I have planned to port this code atleast to 9653. Also it still needs real testing on car with sensor.


Last edited by donner; Jan 15, 2012 at 05:13 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2012 | 05:22 PM
  #93  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
looks pretty good to me
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2012 | 06:37 PM
  #94  
Zeitronix's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Donner, this looks great!
It would help a lot if you title it ECA Injector Interpolation instead of EC Sensor or it will get confused with Flex Fuel Sensor, which does not output 0-5V. We will have upset tuners who will think their Flex Fuel sensor is DOE.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2012 | 06:43 PM
  #95  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
That is awesome, I love how you can change the interp curve because it will for sure not be 1:1.

How about boost as well?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2012 | 12:10 AM
  #96  
donner's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 2
From: Europe
We can change table names what ever is the best, this was just my work name for tables. With EC Sensor I meant whole measurement system generally (sensor+some analog output device).

Zeitronix, how fast your ECA is ready to output proper analog signal when you turn ignition on and what it does output when it is not ready? GM sensor readiness seems to be <250ms. In my existing program it will enter safety mode if voltage is outside range (low/high). When proper signal is got, program will automatically go to normal operation mode, look-up correct values for factors and stops blinking CEL as a sign for driver that car can be started. What I mean with this is that measurement should be ready as soon as possible so this wait time would be as short as possible. But if wait time I'm talking about is around 250-1000ms, it is more than ok but this is just good to know how my implementation is done.

Boost tables were not in scope in this first phase but of course possible to do that as well. Before I continue with new features (like boost) I want to make sure our idea of interpolation between maps works properly with sensor and there is sense to continue with this project. I don't have any hardware installed (or even sourced yet, I need to buy injectors and sensor) but I will get those in few months, start real testing and report results. And if it turns out our ideas work in real life I can tell you this patch comes out for sure

Last edited by donner; Jan 16, 2012 at 04:24 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 04:22 PM
  #97  
Zeitronix's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Zeitronix ECA is as fast as the sensor. It takes you much more time to start the engine than 250 ms so this not an issue.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 10:33 PM
  #98  
donner's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Originally Posted by Zeitronix
Zeitronix ECA is as fast as the sensor. It takes you much more time to start the engine than 250 ms so this not an issue.
That what I thought, thanks for info. I will build my own freq-to-volts device with some microcontroller and I know it can wake up faster than sensor and 250ms is really not issue at all. Just wanted to let people know how it works at the moment.


Ok guys, project goes to testing phase faster than I originally planned. I ordered few ethanol sensors last night and most probably will get few sets of FIC injectors too to prepare test cars (VIII and IX) and proove this thing out. When testing is made properly I will report results.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 08:27 PM
  #99  
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 162
From: San Francisco
Subscribed! I'm excited by a true flexfuel mod for the 4G63.
I would be willing to test your mod for 96530706 on my 2005 USDM VIII when you are ready for beta testing. In California we often have to switch between 91 RON and E85 and the difference in tunes is difficult to manage when blending the two fuels. Just let me know what is required when you are ready.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 10:26 AM
  #100  
donner's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o
Subscribed! I'm excited by a true flexfuel mod for the 4G63.
I would be willing to test your mod for 96530706 on my 2005 USDM VIII when you are ready for beta testing. In California we often have to switch between 91 RON and E85 and the difference in tunes is difficult to manage when blending the two fuels. Just let me know what is required when you are ready.
Yeah I'm excited too to see if this patch work in practise, code itself is prooven already but I'm just afraid if there is something what we have not taken into account with this whole idea. Should work though but we will see..

If you are 9653 user you are lucky as I will take care of 9653 testing as I just ordered few sets of FIC1100 and will prepare also VIII to test this mod
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #101  
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 162
From: San Francisco
donner - Yep I'm 9653, and thanks for stepping up to develop this patch. Let me know if you would like any help testing a specific ETH sensor.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 12:58 AM
  #102  
donner's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o
donner - Yep I'm 9653, and thanks for stepping up to develop this patch. Let me know if you would like any help testing a specific ETH sensor.
Yeah will let you know. Code is now ported to 9653 and all the stuff is ordered, I hope I can get real life results in two or three weeks.

Last edited by donner; Jan 23, 2012 at 01:10 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #103  
binky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut / Massachusetts U.S.A
Originally Posted by donner
Yeah will let you know. Code is now ported to 9653 and all the stuff is ordered, I hope I can get real life results in two or three weeks.
Good luck!

Looking forward to this


-Bink
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 12:37 AM
  #104  
Z0rr0's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Post Falls, ID
We are working on almost the same system for the Subaru roms as well.

See here: Subaru RomRaider Posts about Flex Fuel

I am writing code for an open-source ECA.

Mine has the capability to run either the Ford or GM sensors with the flick of a setup switch.

when it's complete and tested, i'll release the source and and parts list, so you can build it.. but to give you an idea here are my costs so far:

Arduino Uno: $35
VFD display: $10
Ford Taurus Flex Fuel Sensor: $8
Misc parts: about $5
Project box from radio shack: $15

Total cost so far: about $75, for a fully functioning ECA that can use EITHER SENSOR!

not to discount Zeitronix here, but I like building my own stuff, they make a great product. if you aren't a tinker-er my solution might not be for you.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 01:23 AM
  #105  
donner's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Originally Posted by Z0rr0
We are working on almost the same system for the Subaru roms as well.

See here: Subaru RomRaider Posts about Flex Fuel

I am writing code for an open-source ECA.

Mine has the capability to run either the Ford or GM sensors with the flick of a setup switch.

when it's complete and tested, i'll release the source and and parts list, so you can build it.. but to give you an idea here are my costs so far:

Arduino Uno: $35
VFD display: $10
Ford Taurus Flex Fuel Sensor: $8
Misc parts: about $5
Project box from radio shack: $15

Total cost so far: about $75, for a fully functioning ECA that can use EITHER SENSOR!

not to discount Zeitronix here, but I like building my own stuff, they make a great product. if you aren't a tinker-er my solution might not be for you.
Good info, I need to find some more information about Ford sensor to find out if I it can be used in my case. Price for that seems to be very good Do you have part number and any datasheet for that sensor?

Edit: quick google gives me info that only difference between ford and GM sensor is different frequency range, not a big deal for me as I'm building my own freq-to-volt device with microcontroller. Where did you get sensor for that price? Huh, just paid around 300$ for new GM sensor

Last edited by donner; Jan 29, 2012 at 01:28 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:09 PM.